Categories Society
Hypergamy isn't a straight jacket, Maxim 1:
— Rian Stone, CD (@_Rian_Stone) January 26, 2021
girls like 6' all men but has bad spatial intelligence. When she's into you, she sees you as 7'10"
https://t.co/YCjbbwBXS5
Hypergamy isn't a straight jacket, Maxim 2:
— Rian Stone, CD (@_Rian_Stone) January 26, 2021
While you're dating, you have the biggest dick she's ever seen, and she believes it
After the breakup you have the smallest dick, and she believes it
https://t.co/hpE68xQQAi
Hypergamy isn't a straight jacket, Maxim 3:
— Rian Stone, CD (@_Rian_Stone) January 27, 2021
When you're her prize, she actively sees other men as less attractive.
https://t.co/QVWpAVLVP1
Hypergamy isn't a straight jacket, Maxim 4:
— Rian Stone, CD (@_Rian_Stone) January 27, 2021
What matters more than your looks is your ability to be the status cudgel she hits her friends with over brunch.
https://t.co/Tv3E9NBq1l
Hypergamy isn't a straight jacket, Maxim 5:
— Rian Stone, CD (@_Rian_Stone) January 28, 2021
Girls don't know what arouses them, they only know when they are aroused. Jealousy and loss aversion, strategically placed is your friend.
The Equal Opportunities Questions section of your job application asks for the 'gender' of the applicant with options:
Male
Female
Transgender
Transsexual
Non-Binary
continued...
1/11

...
Non-Binary
Genderfluid
Agender
Bigender
Polygender
Neutrois
Gender Apathetic
Gender not listed.
2/11
'Gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
3/11

Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology, but you don't ask for that.
https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF
'Gender' is not a synonym for sex.
4/11

All the other terms you use, apart from the term 'transsexual', are not protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 and are not defined or used in the Act.
5/11
1. They wildly misrepresent something innocuous (no, Pelosi did not “ban” anything).
2. They come up with a “gotcha” example of hypocrisy... that relies on their misrepresentation.
Shot/Chaser pic.twitter.com/NwAZg7TTrL
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) January 2, 2021
This same exact nonsense gets trotted out constantly. “Oh, so now we’re not allowed to call ourselves husbands or mothers or uncles or aunts or men or women?! Outrage!” But no one at all is doing that, nor have they ever been doing that.
Yet the right loses its shit over this every few months. A lot of the time it’ll be something like... a lawmaker will introduce a bill that would tweak applications for marriage licenses to say “spouse 1” and “spouse 2” instead of just “husband/wife” because the status quo ...
... will have been creating actual legal issues for gay couples who then have to put something false on legal documents designating one of them as “wife.”
It’ll be something like that, just meant to fix an issue that has no material impact on 99% of people.
And the right, like clockwork, will lose their minds over it as though anyone is trying to “ban” the concept of someone being a husband or a wife or a man or a woman or whatever.
From a few years back, here’s Bill O’Reilly doing that
The Equality & Diversity Monitoring form in your job application asks for the 'gender' of the applicant with options:
Male
Female.
However...
https://t.co/Did1oeP6tH
1/9

'Gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
2/9

Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology, but you don't ask for that.
https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF
'Gender' is not a synonym for sex.
3/9

'Gender' relies on demeaning, regressive stereotypical notions of societal roles for the two sexes, concepts that I'm sure you would not wish to be associated with.
4/9
Asking about a personal characteristic such as 'gender' that is not a protected characteristic under the Act, may be in breach of the GDPR by processing personal - and potentially Special Category - data without a lawful basis.
5/9
So has Leeze convinced the SNP that the abuse is from a fake account? “Nowt to do with me, Guv?” Leeze’s account name used to be @Miss_Leeze, it's now @Ms_Leeze, apparently it's an attempt to deny association with the vile bile, archived below: 2/19
The trans activist Leeze Lawrence posted racist tweets then deleted them then claimed they were fake. Unfortunately for Leeze she has a lot more racist tweets as yet undeleted but this time they're archived. It's shocking stuff. Here's a thread with links to archive and originals pic.twitter.com/n2lWxkVISR
— The *Real* History Woman (@historywoman) June 23, 2019
Welcome to hell, Mark!

2/ Mark E Smith's aliases: Joel, Big Moe, Moeloco Venice, & the lesser known "Moskaroni the Morni" which we'll get to in a hot minute.
Anyway, Mark hung out with the Ohio Proud Boys 1/6 in Washington DC. Circled is Joe Sitosky who we exposed here: https://t.co/tmRABvit2b

1/ Meet Joseph Robert Sitosky (aka Joe Spadaro), 27, of Mogadore/Ravenna, OH. Joe was part of the riot that did the insurrection at the U.S. capitol 1/6. He thought it'd be cool to f*ck around, and now he's gonna find out.
— Antifascist Trash Panda \u2199\ufe0f\u2199\ufe0f\u2199\ufe0f\U0001f99d (@trashpandaAFA) January 26, 2021
Welcome to hell, Joe! pic.twitter.com/LyfIt8V6Ka
3/ FAIR USE to show context.
This short video clip shows Joe Sitosky, Mark Smith, and the Ohio Proud Boys all marching together in Washington, DC on 1/6.
Listen to Mark yell, "CRIPS for Trump!" Yes, *those* Crips.

4/ Mark Smith was (is?) a member of the Crips, a gang based in the coastal regions of Southern California, hence the aliases Moeloco Venice and Big Moe.
Mark mentions being a teenager in Los Angeles in the 1980s. Venice is a neighborhood in Los Angeles.

5/ Mark Smith of Ravenna, OH volunteers in his community...we bring this up because in the next tweets we'll show that Mark is racist & fascist. Mark's community needs to be warned about his beliefs.

The BAD: it's buried in their new guidance
The SOLUTION: let's unbury it and make sure every school knows about
Item #1 in the report (yes, #1), lists 5 key "Mitigation strategies to reduce transmission in schools"
It doesn't say 'ventilation', but it does say 'cleaning and healthy facilities'. I use 'healthy buildings' for header when talking ventilation, so this looks promising...
2/

Sure enough, if we click that 'cleaning' hyperlink, it takes us to this CDC page with the title that *does* say ventilation
https://t.co/YlKvTCRslQ
3/

And, on this page, if you scroll down, you find the section on ventilation
(yes, now you can see why I say ventilation is buried. Instead of details, we get yet another link...)
4/

Alright, when we finally click 'ventilation in buildings', we get to this page which actually has the detailed info on ventilation and filtration (side note: this took ~10 months for CDC to produce this page, even though we knew this last winter...)
https://t.co/DTZSadFd29
5/n
