Categories Society
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
Hi @SussexUni @adamtickell @profsaulbecker @EHRC @EHRCChair @KishwerFalkner @RJHilsenrath @trussliz @GEOgovuk
The Equal opportunities monitoring form in your job application asks for the 'gender' of the applicant with options:
Male
Female
Other.
https://t.co/DbKgiLN5yG
1/10
'Gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
2/10
Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology - 'other' is not a valid option.
https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF
'Gender' is not a synonym for sex.
3/10
Asking about a personal characteristic such as 'gender' that is not a protected characteristic under the Act, may be in breach of the GDPR by processing personal - and potentially Special Category - data without a lawful basis.
4/10
If you choose not to gather data on specific protected characteristics (such as sex), you cannot have the information required to ascertain whether or not you could be discriminating on protected characteristics in recruitment. This could be vital in an employment tribunal.
5/10
The Equal opportunities monitoring form in your job application asks for the 'gender' of the applicant with options:
Male
Female
Other.
https://t.co/DbKgiLN5yG
1/10
'Gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
2/10
Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology - 'other' is not a valid option.
https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF
'Gender' is not a synonym for sex.
3/10
Asking about a personal characteristic such as 'gender' that is not a protected characteristic under the Act, may be in breach of the GDPR by processing personal - and potentially Special Category - data without a lawful basis.
4/10
If you choose not to gather data on specific protected characteristics (such as sex), you cannot have the information required to ascertain whether or not you could be discriminating on protected characteristics in recruitment. This could be vital in an employment tribunal.
5/10
Hi @SouthOxon @WhiteHorseDC @Alexa_Kantor @EHRC @EHRCChair @KishwerFalkner @RJHilsenrath @trussliz @GEOgovuk
The Equal Opportunities Monitoring section in your job applications has 'gender' in what appears to be a list of protected characteristics under Equality Act 2010.
1/13
'Gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
2/13
Sex is the protected characteristic under the Act, but that is not on your list.
'Gender' is not a synonym for sex.
3/13
You then ask for the 'gender' of the applicant with options:
Female
Male.
4/13
Again, 'gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
5/13
The Equal Opportunities Monitoring section in your job applications has 'gender' in what appears to be a list of protected characteristics under Equality Act 2010.
1/13
'Gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
2/13
Sex is the protected characteristic under the Act, but that is not on your list.
'Gender' is not a synonym for sex.
3/13
You then ask for the 'gender' of the applicant with options:
Female
Male.
4/13
Again, 'gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
5/13
The GOOD: CDC supports improving ventilation in schools
The BAD: it's buried in their new guidance
The SOLUTION: let's unbury it and make sure every school knows about
Item #1 in the report (yes, #1), lists 5 key "Mitigation strategies to reduce transmission in schools"
It doesn't say 'ventilation', but it does say 'cleaning and healthy facilities'. I use 'healthy buildings' for header when talking ventilation, so this looks promising...
2/
Sure enough, if we click that 'cleaning' hyperlink, it takes us to this CDC page with the title that *does* say ventilation
https://t.co/YlKvTCRslQ
3/
And, on this page, if you scroll down, you find the section on ventilation
(yes, now you can see why I say ventilation is buried. Instead of details, we get yet another link...)
4/
Alright, when we finally click 'ventilation in buildings', we get to this page which actually has the detailed info on ventilation and filtration (side note: this took ~10 months for CDC to produce this page, even though we knew this last winter...)
https://t.co/DTZSadFd29
5/n
The BAD: it's buried in their new guidance
The SOLUTION: let's unbury it and make sure every school knows about
Item #1 in the report (yes, #1), lists 5 key "Mitigation strategies to reduce transmission in schools"
It doesn't say 'ventilation', but it does say 'cleaning and healthy facilities'. I use 'healthy buildings' for header when talking ventilation, so this looks promising...
2/
Sure enough, if we click that 'cleaning' hyperlink, it takes us to this CDC page with the title that *does* say ventilation
https://t.co/YlKvTCRslQ
3/
And, on this page, if you scroll down, you find the section on ventilation
(yes, now you can see why I say ventilation is buried. Instead of details, we get yet another link...)
4/
Alright, when we finally click 'ventilation in buildings', we get to this page which actually has the detailed info on ventilation and filtration (side note: this took ~10 months for CDC to produce this page, even though we knew this last winter...)
https://t.co/DTZSadFd29
5/n
Here we go everyone..
Brace yourselves...
Pence already faces challenge from the floor.
Pence rules out debate.
Ive never seen anything this tense before in a parliament - including brexit.
Ooooh objection to Arizona vote!
Blimey.
Incredible stuff.
4/
They really are going to burn this down.
Absolutely incredible.
Whole process stops.
5/
Folks this is going to be dragged out over hours.
Possibly days.
Brace yourselves...
So if you're looking for a link to what's happening now in the US.https://t.co/8xbokPVrlS
— Nick\U0001f1ec\U0001f1e7\U0001f1ea\U0001f1fa (@nicktolhurst) January 6, 2021
Pence already faces challenge from the floor.
Pence rules out debate.
Ive never seen anything this tense before in a parliament - including brexit.
Ooooh objection to Arizona vote!
Blimey.
Incredible stuff.
4/
They really are going to burn this down.
Absolutely incredible.
Whole process stops.
5/
Folks this is going to be dragged out over hours.
Possibly days.
Ok so, the NI #motherandbabyhomes report and its ROI counterpart are not directly comparable for many reasons. However, the NI report models some best practice that deserves to be highlighted/praised.
I (obviously) haven't had time to read the whole thing yet. (But at a first glance, it strikes me as well-written, so I have it on my list).
Like the ROI Commissioners, the academic authors here have huge power over the story. They carefully make themselves accountable for their scholarship and its effects. So here are some good things:
1) The Report attributes its origins to recommendations of UN Treaty bodies. It doesn't engage in sustained human-rights-based analysis, but doesn't ignore it either.
2) The researchers behind the report were appointed following a competitive tendering process.
With @seanoco78853943 and @LiviDeeHistory and John Privilege it's been a long road but very glad to see this report published today https://t.co/MpPPkmepxi
— Leanne McCormick (@Leannemcck) January 26, 2021
I (obviously) haven't had time to read the whole thing yet. (But at a first glance, it strikes me as well-written, so I have it on my list).
Like the ROI Commissioners, the academic authors here have huge power over the story. They carefully make themselves accountable for their scholarship and its effects. So here are some good things:
1) The Report attributes its origins to recommendations of UN Treaty bodies. It doesn't engage in sustained human-rights-based analysis, but doesn't ignore it either.
2) The researchers behind the report were appointed following a competitive tendering process.