I tried 26 Indian D2C (Direct-to-consumer) brands in 52 weeks!
{list below}
https://t.co/hfMocvmBEK
{list below}
fellow coffee lovers \u2615\ufe0f
— miten sampat (@miten) December 23, 2020
super excited to share that @CRED_club Store now has the widest collection of Coffee beans you can find in India!
50+ varietals of beans, 7 brands (+5 soon) + gear
we aim to be the best place to satisfy that espresso urge! https://t.co/VgQvmdn51Q pic.twitter.com/P64L3jozSU
1. @theragecoffee (Coffee)
2. @KCROASTERS (Coffee)
3. https://t.co/fVvNlzcKtD (Coffee)
4. @drinkslaycoffee (Coffee)
5. @RoastersToffee (Coffee)
6. @SvamiDrinks (Craft Tonics)
7. @brewhouseicetea (Iced Tea)
8. @VahdamTeas (Tea)
9. @socksoho (Socks)
10. @thesouledstore (T-shirts)
Food:
11. @thegourmetjar (Dips & Spreads)
12. https://t.co/feTa0uDm4u (Hot Sauce)
13. @wholetruthfood (Protein Bars)
14. @epigamia (Yogurt)
15. @cafe_jei (Coffee Apparatus)
16. https://t.co/A3qR9MlVAu (Mattress)
17. https://t.co/1D9VYUwUZf (Pillows)
18. @SleepyCat_India (Pillows)
19. @smartivitylabs (STEM Toys)
20. @BombayShavingCo (Beard Care)
21. @theustraa (Beard Care)
22. @ZeroRisque (Face Masks)
23. https://t.co/ymflng3sJG (Incense Sticks)
24. @SuppIndia (Multi-vitamins)
25. https://t.co/VBGrauIah3 (Protein Supplement)
26. https://t.co/qF3o4hN6pw (Sneaker Care)
P.P.S. I have a podcast where I have interacted with the founders of Indian D2C brands & other Indian startups.🚀
https://t.co/Q8pbXhcv33
More from Society
Krugman is, of course, right about this. BUT, note that universities can do a lot to revitalize declining and rural regions.
See this thing that @lymanstoneky wrote:
And see this thing that I wrote:
And see this book that @JamesFallows wrote:
And see this other thing that I wrote:
One thing I've been noticing about responses to today's column is that many people still don't get how strong the forces behind regional divergence are, and how hard to reverse 1/ https://t.co/Ft2aH1NcQt
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 20, 2018
See this thing that @lymanstoneky wrote:
And see this thing that I wrote:
And see this book that @JamesFallows wrote:
And see this other thing that I wrote:
This is a piece I've been thinking about for a long time. One of the most dominant policy ideas in Washington is that policy should, always and everywhere, move parents into paid labor. But what if that's wrong?
My reporting here convinced me that there's no large effect in either direction on labor force participation from child allowances. Canada has a bigger one than either Romney or Biden are considering, and more labor force participation among women.
But what if that wasn't true?
Forcing parents into low-wage, often exploitative, jobs by threatening them and their children with poverty may be counted as a success by some policymakers, but it’s a sign of a society that doesn’t value the most essential forms of labor.
The problem is in the very language we use. If I left my job as a New York Times columnist to care for my 2-year-old son, I’d be described as leaving the labor force. But as much as I adore him, there is no doubt I’d be working harder. I wouldn't have stopped working!
I tried to render conservative objections here fairly. I appreciate that @swinshi talked with me, and I'm sorry I couldn't include everything he said. I'll say I believe I used his strongest arguments, not more speculative ones, in the piece.
My reporting here convinced me that there's no large effect in either direction on labor force participation from child allowances. Canada has a bigger one than either Romney or Biden are considering, and more labor force participation among women.
But what if that wasn't true?
Forcing parents into low-wage, often exploitative, jobs by threatening them and their children with poverty may be counted as a success by some policymakers, but it’s a sign of a society that doesn’t value the most essential forms of labor.
The problem is in the very language we use. If I left my job as a New York Times columnist to care for my 2-year-old son, I’d be described as leaving the labor force. But as much as I adore him, there is no doubt I’d be working harder. I wouldn't have stopped working!
I tried to render conservative objections here fairly. I appreciate that @swinshi talked with me, and I'm sorry I couldn't include everything he said. I'll say I believe I used his strongest arguments, not more speculative ones, in the piece.
I appreciate his intellectual curiosity and effort. I have quibbles. But my big disappointment is there was no mention of unintended consequences, which we discussed and which are kind of THE core conservative concern on this issue.
— \U0001d682\U0001d68c\U0001d698\U0001d69d\U0001d69d \U0001d686\U0001d692\U0001d697\U0001d69c\U0001d691\U0001d692\U0001d699 (@swinshi) February 18, 2021