Nobody is saying that trans-identified humans should not have human rights; what women are objecting to is the fact that trans activism is seeking to eliminate the following sex-based rights and protections that women have.

A thread.

Here is a list of the Human Rights of Women that trans activism is eliminating; it was written by Gallus Mag, who had her blog deleted by Wordpress after she published this.
1. Removing the legal right of women to organise politically against sex-based oppression by males.
2. Removing the legal right of women to assemble outside the presence of men.
3. Removing the legal right of women to educational programs created for women outside the presence of men.
4. Eliminating data collection of sex-based inequalities in areas where females are underrepresented.
5. Elimination of sex-based crime statistics.
6. Eliminating athletic programs and sports competitions for women and girls.
7. Removing the legal right of women to be free from the presence of men in areas of public accommodation where nudity occurs.
8. Elimination of grants, scholarships, board and trustee designations, representative positions, and affirmative programs for women.
9. Removing the legal right of women to create reproductive clinics, rape crisis services, support groups, or any organisations for females.
10. Eliminating media and all public discourse specific to females.
11. Removal of the right of journalists to report the sex, and history, of subjects.
12. Eliminating the legal right of lesbians to congregate publicly.
13. Elimination of lesbian-specific organisations and advocacy groups.
14. Removing the legal right of women to free speech related to sex roles and gender.
15. Elimination of the legal right of women to protection from state-enforced sex-roles (appearance/behaviour/thought).
16. Elimination of the legal right of girls to protection from state-enforced sex-roles in public education.
17. Elimination of the patient right of dependent females to hospital/facility bed assignments separate from males.
18. Elimination of the right of dependent females to prefer female providers for their intimate personal care requirements.
19. Elimination of the human right of female prisoners under state confinement to be housed separately from male prisoners.
20. Unlike any other social justice movement in history, the contemporary push for "Transgender Rights" (***as it is currently being played out***) are unique in that they are based on eliminating the sex-based rights and protections of women and girls.
This is not about individuals who are gender fluid. This is about a co-opted movement. It's about Men's Rights Activists eradicating women's rights.
What does it take to make people understand? This is not about gender fluid folks expressing their gender fluid spirit, it's about men claiming to be women and taking over women's spaces and terrorising them there-in.
This is about men colonising the sacred feminine, pushing fetishism, pushing pornography, pushing sex slavery/prostitution, pushing sex trafficking, manufacturing perpetual children (puberty interruption), sterilising young people (eugenics).
It's about men erasing women from political discourse, eradicating women's rights, and rendering women powerless.

Do you understand now?

More from Society

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.