Mollyycolllinss's Categories
Mollyycolllinss's Authors
Latest Saves
I do *not* fuck with pimps.
I do not like pimps.
I think that they are generally scum.
But they probably donât operate like how you imagine.
I feel like so many people don\u2019t know what a pimp actually is, like, in the real world, and that lack of understanding is often harmful to sex workers.
— \u2728Jessica Starling\u2728 (@J3ssicaStarling) December 24, 2020
Would anyone be interested in an educational thread based on my and other ppls experiences?
First, I wanna address the cultural conception of the âpimpâ
This conception is based in white supremacy
It is a black and/or foreign man, who kidnaps little white girls and sells their innocence against their will with violence
This is what youâve been told is a âpimpâ
I need you to delete this from your brain because this caricature of white supremacist fear of physically and sexually aggressive black men does not exist
The first person in the sex industry who tried to be my âpimpâ was a skinny 30 year old white woman who was also a stripper.
Thereâs a reason anti-SW orgs push the imagery of evil non-white men as pimps
I also need everyone to know 99.9999% of pimps are not in the business of kidnapping people and locking them in a hotel room against their will to service customers.
I canât say it never ever ever ever could happen, but, the VAST majority of the time, it is not that
I'd love for the President's pardon powers to be restricted to before the election
@greg_doucette What's the likelihood and desirability of a new constitutional amendment which says that presidents cannot pardon anybody in the last 100 days of each term?
— Evergreen JM \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \U0001f310 (@ElectronJ2) December 24, 2020
Very low
I won't put them at zero because you never know what could theoretically happen, but the last amendment was largely accidental and still 28 years ago
The last intentional amendment was ratified 49 years ago
What's the chances we ever see a Constitutional Amendment in our lifetimes, at this rate?
— Jeremy (@11JustBreathe11) December 24, 2020
No
People shouldn't end up with fewer rights by banding together, that's just
This one maybe: https://t.co/apWQyLD2i3
— Evergreen JM \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \U0001f310 (@ElectronJ2) December 24, 2020
Don't know the precise verbiage, but it would require the Wyoming Rule for House seats and expand the Senate to 3 Senators per
If you could unilaterally add an amendment, what would it be?
— KJJBAA (@KJJBAA) December 24, 2020
Yes: that's the purpose of the House, and the # of electoral votes for President being rooted in the
Yes Wyoming rule. No on 3 senators. The senate is broken now that CA has 39M people and Wyoming has 500k. Adding more senators doesn\u2019t fix that. Need to add some semblance of balance.
— Bryan Duva (@duva60) December 24, 2020

Notice the textual similarities between 1 Nephi 20:1 [ https://t.co/agtlGhpMEJ ] and Isaiah 48:1 in the KJV [ https://t.co/gB5Qk3CFMU ]
Isaiah 48:1 (KJV) Hear ye this, O house of Jacob, which are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, which swear by the name of the Lord, and make mention of the God of Israel, but not in truth, nor in righteousness.
1 Nephi 20:1 "Hearken and hear this, O house of Jacob, who are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, or out of the waters of baptism, ...
... who swear by the name of the Lord, and make mention of the God of Israel, yet they swear not in truth nor in righteousness."
An Open Letter To: .@KirkCameron
— Chelle (@rellehcim) December 24, 2020
So, I opened Twitter. I hoped to find a cute animal or maybe a funny meme or - I don't know - something to alleviate this weight in my chest. The lack of relief from my fears. The overwhelming range of emotions that reduce me to crying when our heater kicks on at night so
Husband doesn't hear me and feel bad about my sorrow. Anything but what I actually found. You. Trending on Twitter. And against better judgement, I clicked your name. And there, embodied before me in a solid form, unlike me in a cancer visit with my husband, was YOU doing the
unimaginable: mocking COVID protocols with a large group of people and forcing yourself into the lives, and twitterfeeds, of people who follow the rules and try to do the things that would allow cancer patients' families in the doctor's office with them.

2. News: Arizona School Board Member Indicted for Ballot Harvesting Voter Fraud in Yuma County
3. News: Biden Education Secretary Oversaw Creation of Critical Theory Class for High Schoolers
4. News: Trump Administration Finds Historic Success Rescuing American Hostages đđđhttps://t.co/JCpdTbdWDI #BRAVO
5. News: Ossoff Refuses to Release âFurther Financial Informationâ After Controversial Payments Surface - CASHING CHECKS FROM CHINA https://t.co/D4qvHPFGa5 #Georgia #Runoff
Trump has upended the traditional criteria for clemency: https://t.co/HkOXJwY4G7. The traditional guiding principle: âa pardon is granted on the basis of the petitioner's demonstrated good conduct for a substantial period of time after conviction and service of sentence.â
Request for pardon presumptively must wait 5 years after conviction or release. Traditional criteria include superlative post-conviction conduct & character; acceptance of responsibility & remorse; and hesitation to pardon serious offenses (violent crime, white collar fraud, etc)
V few of Trumpâs clemency decisions meet these criteria. His pardons usually based on insider contacts, & are for v serious crimes that often dont satisfy 5-year rule, usually for people who do not express remorse. They almost always serve Trumpâs personal or political interests.
As I told WP: âOther presidents have occasionally issued abusive, self-serving pardons based on insider connections. Almost all of Trumpâs pardons fit that pattern. What other presidents did exceptionally, Trump does as a matter of course.â