So I wanna start with a disclaimer:

I do *not* fuck with pimps.

I do not like pimps.

I think that they are generally scum.

But they probably don’t operate like how you imagine.

First, I wanna address the cultural conception of the “pimp”

This conception is based in white supremacy

It is a black and/or foreign man, who kidnaps little white girls and sells their innocence against their will with violence
This is what you’ve been told is a “pimp”

I need you to delete this from your brain because this caricature of white supremacist fear of physically and sexually aggressive black men does not exist
The first person in the sex industry who tried to be my “pimp” was a skinny 30 year old white woman who was also a stripper.

There’s a reason anti-SW orgs push the imagery of evil non-white men as pimps
I also need everyone to know 99.9999% of pimps are not in the business of kidnapping people and locking them in a hotel room against their will to service customers.

I can’t say it never ever ever ever could happen, but, the VAST majority of the time, it is not that
In my experience with the women and sex workers I have worked with, people have pimps because they have been convinced it’s a good financial decision, or they have actively sought out a pimp to make more money
Yes, there are many people who actively seek out pimps. There are people who want to have pimps!

It was so normal in the clubs I worked at that it was weird that I didn’t have a pimp, and most of the women I spoke to tried to convince me I was missing out on money.
Why would someone want to have a pimp?

There are actually plenty of reasons, most of which are financial or pertain to survival.
A pimp can provide clients for you and guarantee you money.

A pimp can give you a condo to live in and a car for mobility, and then allow you to pay them back.

A pimp can make sure a client doesn’t scam you out of money or assault you.
If someone fucks with you in any way, your pimp can take care of it, one way or another
Is this relationship inherently exploitative? Yes, but it’s also mutually beneficial.

Therefore, most pimps are not going to beat the women that work for them to get money out of them. The sex worker, in a lot of cases, wants to work with the pimp.
In my experience, instead of physical violence, most pimps use emotional manipulation.

I’ve met a lot of sex workers who feel like they “owe” their pimps. Their pimps will buy them gifts, take them out to dinner, have sex with them in a romantic context.
I once heard a woman say she would take a bullet for her pimp.

You don’t need to hit anyone when people will work for you and give you money out of guilt or fabricated emotional closeness
You also have to understand that their is a certain culture, at least in the clubs I worked at, that encouraged the workers to get pimps. Women who want to be on the same “team” and will try to recruit you. Forming a kind of sisterhood under working for the same pimp.
Sometimes, sex workers will act as pimps for other sex workers. Sometimes they’ll stop being sex workers and just be pimps.

(Which is why you can’t be too friendly with everyone when you’re working at a club)
This is the most common sort of archetype of pimp I have experienced. People of any sex or race who use emotional and financial manipulation for monetary gain, in exchange for some services for the sex worker
I have also seen pimps who are violent. I saw a woman have to hide under a table while her pimp attempted to hit her in the middle of the club.

I also know there are pimps who do lock women in hotel rooms.

But it is not the majority of cases.
The second type of prominent pimp, however, is the abusive boyfriend, who is way worse than the typical pimp who you’ll find at a strip club.
In fact, I suspect this is the most common type of pimp, but it’s hidden as most things happen behind closed doors.

Yes, your boyfriend can be your pimp. If your boyfriend or partner forces you to work and takes your money, they’re a pimp.
And then there a people who are “legally” pimps but do not resemble the cultural perception as a pimp

These are managers, agencies, and brothel owners
(By legally, I mean by the legal definition are pimps, not that their business is legal)
These businesses can be shitty and abusive, but vary from company to company.

Many workers choose to work for these companies for a variety of reasons, including more guaranteed clients, safety, and not having to deal with your own marketing/business
Through this, you can see that most sex workers with pimps have chosen to have pimps for one reason or another.

As well, in most cases where a sex worker is in a forced relationship with a pimp, it is typically an abusive intimate partner

More from Society

global health policy in 2020 has centered around NPI's (non-pharmaceutical interventions) like distancing, masks, school closures

these have been sold as a way to stop infection as though this were science.

this was never true and that fact was known and knowable.

let's look.


above is the plot of social restriction and NPI vs total death per million. there is 0 R2. this means that the variables play no role in explaining one another.

we can see this same relationship between NPI and all cause deaths.

this is devastating to the case for NPI.


clearly, correlation is not proof of causality, but a total lack of correlation IS proof that there was no material causality.

barring massive and implausible coincidence, it's essentially impossible to cause something and not correlate to it, especially 51 times.

this would seem to pose some very serious questions for those claiming that lockdowns work, those basing policy upon them, and those claiming this is the side of science.

there is no science here nor any data. this is the febrile imaginings of discredited modelers.

this has been clear and obvious from all over the world since the beginning and had been proven so clearly by may that it's hard to imagine anyone who is actually conversant with the data still believing in these responses.

everyone got the same R
Patriotism is an interesting concept in that it’s excepted to mean something positive to all of us and certainly seen as a morally marketable trait that can fit into any definition you want for it.+


Tolstoy, found it both stupid and immoral. It is stupid because every patriot holds his own country to be the best, which obviously negates all other countries.+

It is immoral because it enjoins us to promote our country’s interests at the expense of all other countries, employing any means, including war. It is thus at odds with the most basic rule of morality, which tells us not to do to others what we would not want them to do to us+

My sincere belief is that patriotism of a personal nature, which does not impede on personal and physical liberties of any other, is not only welcome but perhaps somewhat needed.

But isn’t adherence to a more humane code of life much better than nationalistic patriotism?+

Göring said, “people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”+

You May Also Like

The first ever world map was sketched thousands of years ago by Indian saint
“Ramanujacharya” who simply translated the following verse from Mahabharat and gave the world its real face

In Mahabharat,it is described how 'Maharishi Ved Vyasa' gave away his divine vision to Sanjay


Dhritarashtra's charioteer so that he could describe him the events of the upcoming war.

But, even before questions of war could begin, Dhritarashtra asked him to describe how the world looks like from space.

This is how he described the face of the world:

सुदर्शनं प्रवक्ष्यामि द्वीपं तु कुरुनन्दन। परिमण्डलो महाराज द्वीपोऽसौ चक्रसंस्थितः॥
यथा हि पुरुषः पश्येदादर्शे मुखमात्मनः। एवं सुदर्शनद्वीपो दृश्यते चन्द्रमण्डले॥ द्विरंशे पिप्पलस्तत्र द्विरंशे च शशो महान्।

—वेद व्यास, भीष्म पर्व, महाभारत


Meaning:-

हे कुरुनन्दन ! सुदर्शन नामक यह द्वीप चक्र की भाँति गोलाकार स्थित है, जैसे पुरुष दर्पण में अपना मुख देखता है, उसी प्रकार यह द्वीप चन्द्रमण्डल में दिखायी देता है। इसके दो अंशो मे पीपल और दो अंशो मे विशाल शश (खरगोश) दिखायी देता है।


Meaning: "Just like a man sees his face in the mirror, so does the Earth appears in the Universe. In the first part you see leaves of the Peepal Tree, and in the next part you see a Rabbit."

Based on this shloka, Saint Ramanujacharya sketched out the map, but the world laughed