I use 4 scanners:
1) Volatility, Volume & daily range compression scanner
2) Punch-Drunk-Love
3) GE Ratio - to track fundamentally strong stocks
4) Recently created one to track Power Play setups.
I get around 150-200 stocks daily & choose the ones with the most potential.
Sir, How do u find a set up - Do you track chart of each stock daily ? Or do u have filters , that lead you to a number of stocks , after which you scan them.
— AKASH GUPTA (@lockdownmurti) August 25, 2021
More from Ravi Sharma
1) 50 WMA > 100 WMA > 150 WMA > 200 WMA
2) Price is within 25% range of its 52-Week High and above 30% or more from its 52-Week Low.
Just one question , how do u differentiate stage 2 from 1 , apart from volume , what else do u look ?
— Priyanshu (@Priyans48107837) August 6, 2021
I have made some minor tweakings to this timing model since this tweet but it still will give you an idea and primer 👇
Trading 101 with SmallCap Index
— Ravi Sharma (@StocksNerd) August 20, 2019
1. Swing trades when bullish divergence in MACD-H forms
2. Breakout trades if Index closes above 22-Day high
3. Pullback/Pocket Pivot trades if Index consolidates constructively while13-EMA>22-EMA
4. Sell, go cash if Index breaches 10-Day low, NQA pic.twitter.com/u8VjXrU0Re
Since market cap of IRCTC is good, I reduced the move rule from 40% to 30% in this case. https://t.co/qzL5rgmtg8
Just a small doubt . I sold Yesterday thinking it was a climax 6% move . How did you decide to sell today ?
— Volatility and Volume Trader (@VolVolatTrader) September 7, 2021
Any rules where you sell positions . Just to learn
But I can give you some pointers-
1) Choose stocks in Stage 2 with RS > 75
2) Identify these setups - Cup with Handle, High Tight Flag, Rectangle, VCP, Squat, Low Cheat, 3-C.
2) Wait for the significant contraction in daily range, volatility & Volume.
How do u screen stocks???
— \u2206bhishek Jain (@AbhishekTMM) August 6, 2021
More from Screeners
Take small cap index for example
Whenever Monthly RSI is below or around 40, the index bottoms out
We are getting there.
If I had 50% cash, I would have deployed some in beaten down stocks where earnings growth is intact. https://t.co/t5WwgH1V5o
I have more than 50% cash but still worried if this is a good time. Will invest 20% by EoY
— Tamil Metaverse (@TamilMetaverse) June 21, 2022
You May Also Like
Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.
Characteristics of a personal moat below:
I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests https://t.co/bB3k1YcH5b
2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.
As Andrew Chen noted:
People talk about \u201cpassive income\u201d a lot but not about \u201cpassive social capital\u201d or \u201cpassive networking\u201d or \u201cpassive knowledge gaining\u201d but that\u2019s what you can architect if you have a thing and it grows over time without intensive constant effort to sustain it
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) November 22, 2018
3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized
Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than
Things that look like moats but likely aren\u2019t or may fade:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
- Proprietary networks
- Being something other than one of the best at any tournament style-game
- Many "awards"
- Twitter followers or general reach without "respect"
- Anything that depends on information asymmetry https://t.co/abjxesVIh9
4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.
After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.
5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.
In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?