Reason and pre-analysis for #BAJAJFINSV before buy-
While buying breakouts, your odds will improve a lot when you prefer the following:
1. Strong Relative Strength.
2. Tight price range on low Volume and a pattern which is easy on eyes. https://t.co/CprKpAfgtj
#BAJAJFINSV
— Ravi Sharma (@StocksNerd) August 14, 2021
Setting up in a tight base. Volume has been drying up.
Waiting for the breakout. pic.twitter.com/KWoGZAwkLO
More from Ravi Sharma
Signs are all over the place, you just needed to read them. https://t.co/17bwpa1psj
#TATAPOWER is consolidating nicely around 50 & 10-DMA.
— Ravi Sharma (@StocksNerd) April 1, 2022
3 Pocket Pivot days in the last couple of weeks are signaling the interest of buyers.
4 months long base.
Steady growth in Earnings & Sales in the last 3 quarters.
Relative Strength: 77
Group Rank: 22 pic.twitter.com/2WFeUGiV1z
Since market cap of IRCTC is good, I reduced the move rule from 40% to 30% in this case. https://t.co/qzL5rgmtg8
Just a small doubt . I sold Yesterday thinking it was a climax 6% move . How did you decide to sell today ?
— Volatility and Volume Trader (@VolVolatTrader) September 7, 2021
Any rules where you sell positions . Just to learn
More from Screeners
You May Also Like
A small tribute/gift to members
Screeners
technical screeners - intraday and positional both
before proceeding - i have helped you , can i ask you so that it can help someone else too
thank you
positional one
run - find #stock - draw chart - find levels
1- Stocks closing daily 2% up from 5 days
https://t.co/gTZrYY3Nht
2- Weekly breakout
https://t.co/1f4ahEolYB
3- Breakouts in short term
https://t.co/BI4h0CdgO2
4- Bullish from last 5
intraday screeners
5- 15 minute Stock Breakouts
https://t.co/9eAo82iuNv
6- Intraday Buying seen in the past 15 minutes
https://t.co/XqAJKhLB5G
7- Stocks trading near day's high on 5 min chart with volume BO intraday
https://t.co/flHmm6QXmo
Thank you
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?