It's not. The conditions that make up the responsibility is what determines whether it should be upheld or not.
Men need to know when to take responsibility.
They also need to know when to refuse it.
Thread.
It's not. The conditions that make up the responsibility is what determines whether it should be upheld or not.
If its family, unless they reached a level of disownment, responsibility meets no conditions.
It's a mans duty to carry as much as responsibility to alleviate his family's burden.
1. An incentive
2. Authority
3. Leverage
Ideally you want responsibility to beget all three. Most of the time, you start off with only one.
You might learn a thing or two, which can be valuable, but overall, it is value exchanged for nothing.
If it doesn't, then you're not disagreeable enough to negotiate conditions that fairly exchanges value.
Authority is valuable. It turns you into a leader.
And you should reject it. Being exploited in this way is a good indicator that you're too agreeable,
and people end up easily extracting value out of you.
If the responsibility given, is very valuable in of itself, & can be leveraged against the person giving it.
This is the cunning method that forces a return in value.
See thread ⬇️
Any responsibility delegated to you by your boss without a pay rise,
— \u1d1c\u0274\u1d0d\u1d0f\u1d05\u1d07\u0280\u0274 (@UnmodernM) October 20, 2020
takes you one step closer in becoming an inseparable part of his business,
to which you can infinitely leverage against him later & get what you want.
Be patient. Then leverage to a chokehold.
Thread.
More from ᴜɴᴍᴏᴅᴇʀɴ
More from Life
It doesn't happen because you made it happen.
It happens because you allow it to happen.
https://t.co/j5hPyw9m9m
There is a fine line between persistence and stubbornness.
— The Irrational Investor (@position_trader) August 28, 2019
True for life, true for investing.
You May Also Like
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw