Webinar on "Career in Constitutional Law Practice" organized by Jammu & Kashmir High Court and J&K Judicial Academy will begin shortly.

Senior Advocates Shyam Divan, Madhavi Divan, Parag P. Tripathi and Neelima Tripathi will be in conversation with lawyer @gautambhatia88

Session begins.

Rajeev Gupta, Director of J&K Judicial Academy introduces the guests.
@gautambhatia88 now takes over.

He speaks of how the pandemic and social media has taken the Court out of the Courtroom into the public realm.
With platforms such as @LiveLawIndia and @barandbench giving a blow-by-blow account of court proceedings, interest in constitutional law has grown, he says.

He adds that many constitutional lawyers do not start out wanting to practise constitutional laws as such.
Senior Madhavi Divan begins speaking.

She narrates her journey from a law office that was predominantly handled commercial matters.

She opines that it is important to have a multi-faceted grounding in diverse streams of law before specialising in one.
Constitutional law speaks to various realms of practice, Gautam Bhatia agrees.
Senior Advocate Neelam Tripathi shares with the audience that she had qualified as a chartered accountant. Meeting her life partner sparked her interest in law.

Clients are satisfied if their lawyers are able to answer all their questions, not just those from one area, she adds
However, a grounding in constitutional law is important when you argue matters pertaining to writ jurisdiction of constitutional courts: Senior Adv Neelima Tripathi says.
Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi agrees with the other panellists and says that Indian law does not follow a 'silo' approach, and the laws weave into each other.
@gautambhatia88 asks Senior Advocate Tripathi a question about whether there is an overlap with administrative and constitutional law in the recent past.

Most administrative law principles are grounded in constitutional law principles, he explains
Senior Advocate Shyam Divan is speaking now.

He says that a person who intends to practise law needs to be a 'generalist' at some point.

If a person intends to devote a career to constitutional law, s/he could consider a career in academia, he opines.
Another good introduction to constitutional laws could be by starting law practice with a lawyer in the High Courts or Supreme Court: Senior Advocate Shyam Divan
He recounts that there are two books in every lawyer's library - a D.D. Basu 'Shorter Constitution of India' and Seervai's Treatise on Constitutional Law.

While the latter was mostly untouched, DD Basu was widely used by busy lawyers being more concise, Senior Adv Divan says.
@gautambhatia88 speaks about how the Constitution of India has often become synonymous with Part - 3 (Part on fundamental rights)

He asks the panellists to talk about the diversity of Constitutional Law practice beyond Part 3, for instance inter State-Centre commerce & tax.
Senior Advocate Shyam Divan speaks about his initial foray into constitutional law practice through early maritime disputes.

These were before alternative forms of disputes became popular, he adds.
Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi emphasizes that legislative competence to enact laws is another important area in constitutional practice that needs to be mastered.
Constitutional lawyers see what others do not, and then bring it to the Court's notice.

He illustrates using the basic structure doctrine, which is not expressly provided for anywhere, but is obvious once it is brought to notice

You can't unsee it: @gautambhatia88 quips
Senior Adv Neelam Tripathi speaks about the right to property, being a right outside Part - 3 that was crucial in constitutional law practice.
Senior Advocate Madhavi Divan picks up from Senior Advocate Shyam Divan's advice to young lawyers to start out in chamber that deal with constitutional matters.
'I would say that the choice of spouse & location is as important as choice of chamber', she says, referring to her move to Delhi from pure commercial practice in Bombay.
Once I started, I found it fascinating. I did not study law in India, so I learnt constitutional law as he cases came my way: Senior Advocate Madhavi Divan

The advantage of Indian law is that it does not require one to specialise in any particular area.
@gautambhatia88 asks the panellists to describe their favourite constitutional law cases.
Senior Advocate Madhavi Divan recounts a case she argued, where Senior Adv Shyam Divan represented the opposite side.
The case related to whether an 8-year-old Jain girl could take up monastic vows, which in effect resulted in her giving up her rights to education & other rights.
Other cases she lists: The WhatsApp Privacy case, the Sahara media guidelines matter, the triple talaq case, and a tax matter she argued despite having no experience.
Senior Advocate Madhavi Divan speaks of her experiences on the Shayara Bano (Triple Talaq) case and how they believed the Supreme Court had upheld the practice of Triple Talaq because the dissents were read out first.
https://t.co/tjKvmyHmnS
Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi narrates events that led up to the Kesavananda Bharati.

It had all the thrills of a T20 match, he expresses.
Senior Advocate Shyam Divan discusses a case he argued.
The Maharashtra government proposed to a law to vest Bombay High Court's original commercial jurisdiction with city civil courts. He was one of the lawyers for the petitioners.
Though they lost the case before both the High Court and the Supreme Court, they ended up succeeding, he says. This was since the Commercial Courts Act required the setting up of 'specialised' commercial courts, and continued the Bombay High Court's original jurisdiction.
The panellists are taking questions from the audience now.
We must believe in our system, Senior Adv Shyam Divan says, in response to a question asking about the strength of the legal system.

We need constitutional functionaries with courage & judges with courage, he adds. Else we will have jellyfish judges & a jellyfish jurisprudence.
Responding to a question on the misuse of Public Interest Litigation, Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi says "PIL is like nuclear power, it depends on how you use it"

PILs have been used to advance social good but frauduent/malafide PILs are sometimes used to drown out genuine ones
A question is posed to @gautambhatia88 on how to choose internships.

He iterates the point that an understanding of all laws is essential and internships that allow for this should be chosen.
Chief Justice of Jammu and Kashmir High Court thanks all the panellists for their participation.
The session closes with a vote of thanks by Rajeev Gupta, Director of the Jammu and Kashmir Judicial Academy.

More from Bar & Bench

More from Law

High crime talk from Fredo


VA curfew


Sen. Grassley - Biden family investigated, potential financial crimes WW including China

Warning


March
Today the superior court will hear oral arguments in Midtown Citizens Coalition v. Municipality of Anchorage. "MCC" is an unofficial group that opposes the recall of Assembly member Felix Rivera. The question is whether the Muni properly certified the recall petition. #aklaw


Before posting the MCC v. MOA briefs, it's worth noting that the legal arguments made by Rivera's supporters parallel those made by Dunleavy in Recall Dunleavy v. State. Both Rivera and Dunleavy argued that their recall petitions should have been denied by election officials.

So let's play a game called "Who Argued It." Guess which politician, Rivera or Dunleavy, made the following arguments in court:

1. "The grounds for recall stated in the petition are insufficient as a matter of law, and therefore the petition should have been rejected."


2. "Even under Alaska’s liberal recall standards, courts have not hesitated to find petitions legally insufficient when those petitions did not contain sufficient factual allegations of unlawful activity to state sufficient grounds for recall.”

3. "The allegations must be sufficiently particular to allow the official a meaningful opportunity to respond . . . . [and] ensure that voters have the information they need to vote."
How to avoid (successful) accusations of defamation on Twitter. A few thoughts from someone who is NOT a libel lawyer, but does say very critical things about named individuals. 1/

1. Facts are different from opinions. But stating an opinion can imply a fact.
https://t.co/1PkiI4olib


2. When I tweet I aim to be sure A. I show the *facts* I am basing my *opinion* on. B. I have good reason to believe the *facts* are true. C. My opinion is reasonable based on the facts.

Here I am calling Arron Banks a racist (opinion). Pointing out this is because he called for mosques to be demolished (fact). 4/


I can prove this fact - and others - about what Banks has said. And I can justify why in my opinion that shows he’s a racist. 5/

You May Also Like

The UN just voted to condemn Israel 9 times, and the rest of the world 0.

View the resolutions and voting results here:

The resolution titled "The occupied Syrian Golan," which condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights, was adopted by a vote of 151 - 2 - 14.

Israel and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/HoO7oz0dwr


The resolution titled "Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people..." was adopted by a vote of 153 - 6 - 9.

Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/1Ntpi7Vqab


The resolution titled "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan" was adopted by a vote of 153 – 5 – 10.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/REumYgyRuF


The resolution titled "Applicability of the Geneva Convention... to the
Occupied Palestinian Territory..." was adopted by a vote of 154 - 5 - 8.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/xDAeS9K1kW