I've been tracking these since December. Michigan

@littlecarrotq Wisconsin case:
https://t.co/MTx8OnAGZr
@littlecarrotq Georgia case:
https://t.co/OCna73PHXu
@littlecarrotq Arizona case:
https://t.co/MX6PvYs4st
@littlecarrotq Another Pennsylvania case. This is the most important one in my opinion. It shows the Republican Legislature broke the law when they created a mail-in ballot law in October, 2019, which they knew was against the state Constitution.
https://t.co/WYp9x6dCWE
@littlecarrotq Other Pennsylvania case:
https://t.co/jFbebr1NUE
@littlecarrotq Third Pennsylvania case, this one is from the Republican State Legislature trying to bail themselves out of what they did in October of 2019. They already had a conference on this one:
https://t.co/CrlQTn6YTQ
@littlecarrotq Fifth Pennsylvania case, which I believe they combined with the previous one:
https://t.co/991yMgQIWR
@littlecarrotq Another Wisconsin case. President Trump just filed a Supplemental Brief on Feb 09 2021.

https://t.co/p3b7u3UbbK

More from Law

The debate over law and order comes to the forefront yet again. Law and order - both can be maintained with equal zeal. One needs to take precedence over the other. Will that be Order over Law or Law over Order?


In other words, what do governments prefer - looking away the other side when law is broken with impunity in the fear that acting against the offender will lead to large scale rioting on the roads?

Or will the government gear up to uphold the sanctity of law and punish every single one trying to break it? There are many examples. Take the Tablighi Wuhan Wave. Or Bangalore Riots. Or the destruction of Temples in Andhra.

Now, if the perpetrators are punished, there is going to be large scale rioting. Pointing out Tablighi Wuhan Wave destroyed many a person in the Gulf when Pakistanis and their minions profiled every Indian and got them arrested for insulting Islam.

No one talks about the post to which the MLA's nephew responded to. Singhu Resort is another. What's stopping the government from clearing the protest site? Is it the same confusion between law and order?

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.