The absolute best 15 scanners which experts are using.

Got these scanners from the following accounts:

1. @Pathik_Trader
2. @sanjufunda
3. @sanstocktrader
4. @SouravSenguptaI
5. @Rishikesh_ADX

Share for the benefit of everyone.

Listing all scanners from @Pathik_Trader Sir first.

1. Open Drive

https://t.co/darjwgqtMc
2. 80-20 Reversal Setup
https://t.co/H5JEz6KNYs
3. Fake paradise

https://t.co/QDV0MFAcf6
4. Trapping Inside Bar (Positional Setup)

https://t.co/SOmfzysDcT
5. Open = High and Open = Low

https://t.co/ohhDNHzSR9
Now all scanners from @sanstocktrader

6. Bullish cloud break out on 1 hour chart .

https://t.co/9G239esKFe
7. Ichimoku cloud break down on 1 hour chart .

https://t.co/KBlNnlo7Py
8. Head and Shoulder

https://t.co/lVgsneS3On
Scanners from @sanjufunda Sir

9. Range Breakout with good volume

https://t.co/cZWXLHL2zu
10. Volume Shockers (Momentum with Volume)

https://t.co/FXFfVOFPJD
11. Near 52 week High consolidation

https://t.co/GabPqdvAtS
12. Trend Reversal

https://t.co/F5Y0Rauelw
Now scanners from @SouravSenguptaI

13. BTST scanner

https://t.co/sFhR75PrU6
14. 3 days Higher High Higher Low

https://t.co/NkVkMhSLht
A scanner of @Rishikesh_ADX

15.Rishikesh ADX Scan

https://t.co/SXlkpJCkvm
These scanners should be sufficient for anyone who was on the lookout for a good scanners.

Contains material for intraday and positional both.

Work hard and make money now.

THE END

_____________________________________

More from Aditya Todmal

Here are my top 10 best tweets of the week: 24th September.

• Stocks to buy & hold forever
• Companies which will always be in business
• How to 10x money in 10 years?
• Feedback of company employees
• MWPL & F&O ban list explained
• Tradingview free version tricks

Stocks one can buy and hold


These companies will always keep running, no matter if recessions come or not.


26% CAGR makes your money 10x in 10


Some life
The most successful stock trader from America & the winner of all the trading competitions he competes in.

20 Powerful tweets to learn from @markminervini

A 🧵thread...

Jesse Livermore


Never let a loss exceed 8% changed his trading game for the


Key early decisions to make for your trading


Never listen to
Twitter is like a free university.

However, 98.8 percent of users missed out on the best content on this platform.

Here are the Top 52 threads from the past 52 weeks of 2022: 🧵

Collaborated with @niki_poojary

(1) Topic: 5EMA Setup of Subhasish Pani by


(2) Topic: Using Volume the right way by


(3) Topic: Python Courses to learn from by


(4) Topic: A list of the top screeners by

More from Tech

A common misunderstanding about Agile and “Big Design Up Front”:

There’s nothing in the Agile Manifesto or Principles that states you should never have any idea what you’re trying to build.

You’re allowed to think about a desired outcome from the beginning.

It’s not Big Design Up Front if you do in-depth research to understand the user’s problem.

It’s not BDUF if you spend detailed time learning who needs this thing and why they need it.

It’s not BDUF if you help every team member know what success looks like.

Agile is about reducing risk.

It’s not Agile if you increase risk by starting your sprints with complete ignorance.

It’s not Agile if you don’t research.

Don’t make the mistake of shutting down critical understanding by labeling it Bg Design Up Front.

It would be a mistake to assume this research should only be done by designers and researchers.

Product management and developers also need to be out with the team, conducting the research.

Shared Understanding is the key objective


Big Design Up Front is a thing to avoid.

Defining all the functionality before coding is BDUF.

Drawing every screen and every pixel is BDUF.

Promising functionality (or delivery dates) to customers before development starts is BDUF.

These things shouldn’t happen in Agile.
There has been a lot of discussion about negative emissions technologies (NETs) lately. While we need to be skeptical of assumed planetary-scale engineering and wary of moral hazard, we also need much greater RD&D funding to keep our options open. A quick thread: 1/10

Energy system models love NETs, particularly for very rapid mitigation scenarios like 1.5C (where the alternative is zero global emissions by 2040)! More problematically, they also like tons of NETs in 2C scenarios where NETs are less essential.
https://t.co/M3ACyD4cv7 2/10


In model world the math is simple: very rapid mitigation is expensive today, particularly once you get outside the power sector, and technological advancement may make later NETs cheaper than near-term mitigation after a point. 3/10

This is, of course, problematic if the aim is to ensure that particular targets (such as well-below 2C) are met; betting that a "backstop" technology that does not exist today at any meaningful scale will save the day is a hell of a moral hazard. 4/10

Many models go completely overboard with CCS, seeing a future resurgence of coal and a large part of global primary energy occurring with carbon capture. For example, here is what the MESSAGE SSP2-1.9 scenario shows: 5/10

You May Also Like

https://t.co/6cRR2B3jBE
Viruses and other pathogens are often studied as stand-alone entities, despite that, in nature, they mostly live in multispecies associations called biofilms—both externally and within the host.

https://t.co/FBfXhUrH5d


Microorganisms in biofilms are enclosed by an extracellular matrix that confers protection and improves survival. Previous studies have shown that viruses can secondarily colonize preexisting biofilms, and viral biofilms have also been described.


...we raise the perspective that CoVs can persistently infect bats due to their association with biofilm structures. This phenomenon potentially provides an optimal environment for nonpathogenic & well-adapted viruses to interact with the host, as well as for viral recombination.


Biofilms can also enhance virion viability in extracellular environments, such as on fomites and in aquatic sediments, allowing viral persistence and dissemination.