We are always aware that squandering the opportunity for an education would be disrespectful to those who never got that chance.
Something you may not know is that professional Black women are hyper focused on qualification.
We are told young that there will be no leg-up for us, and that we MUST excel academically.
We work hard, compete & get into college.
For many of us, our whole family is counting
We are always aware that squandering the opportunity for an education would be disrespectful to those who never got that chance.
There is no hiding or blending in. All your professors are zeroed in on you, trying to ascertain if you can compete. When you produce the goods, they are delighted,
When we ascend into corporate environments, we are again closely scrutinized, not just for competence, but for “fit.”
Our bosses will test us again and again to make sure the “angry black
The onus is always on us to make those around us comfortable, never the other way around.
Once we put our colleagues at ease, things are fine.... until we start getting close to the power echelon.
Then things get dicey.
At base, many many people who are not racist in the sense of
So the Black woman who was all-of-that as a mid-level or even senior manager, is all wrong when it comes to being an executive.
The
Don’t bother with shaking the tree because the coconuts will fall on YOU!
So, when we go through all of that, to whatever degree of success, it is an act of EXTREME audacity to decide to run for public office.
Many are just compelled to do it because we don’t see anyone fighting for our community, or the issues we all face with the passion and focus that we do.
We care very deeply for others,
As we contemplate running for office we know that the decision will have monumental consequences on our lives.
Most of us are the bread
We know the kind of strain running will put on our families, and most of all, we contemplate the kind of hate we will receive for having the nerve to step into the political arena.
We know what’s coming when
So we step out and we run. And we are told in every conceivable way, from every conceivable quarter (even well intentioned Black people) that our talent,
What matters is our “viability,” which is code for money.
Donors give to “viable” candidates, but you can’t get to “viability” unless people are willing to give. So major endorsements are super important to establishing your merit as a
Only, major endorsements are very hard to come by if you haven’t yet raised much money. And so it swirls in a vortex.
For many talented, excellent Black women candidates, their political ambitions die in the “viability vortex” that they can’t break through.
It is the VERY rare Black woman candidate, in the exact right circumstance, who emerges & makes it into national
And when they do, America, all of a sudden, “discovers” a super star!
That’s why there are NO black women losers or slouches who hold major public office.
NONE!
They are all smart, strong, polished, savvy & passionate. ALL. OF. THEM!
There are ZERO Black women
The system would NEVER allow a Black woman who was that trashy
or stupid to get anywhere near power.
So when you consider Stacey Abrams, Cori Bush, Ayanna Pressley, Stacey Plaskett, Kamala Harris, Val Demings, Tish James, Keisha Lance
And perhaps, in 2022, make a special
More from Pam Keith, Esq.
More from Education
Chicago Public Schools are supposed to open for some special needs and pre-K students Monday
The Chicago Teachers Union is now threatening to refuse to return to work in person.
https://t.co/MgDgNe6REj
Meanwhile
https://t.co/FIij8J3r7z
Dr. Fauci: "The default position should be to try as best as possible within reason to keep the children in school or to get them back to school [...] if you look at the data the spread among children and from children is not really big at
UNICEF: "Data from 191 countries shows no consistent link between reopening schools and increased rates of coronavirus
The Chicago Teachers Union is now threatening to refuse to return to work in person.
https://t.co/MgDgNe6REj
Meanwhile
https://t.co/FIij8J3r7z
Dr. Fauci: "The default position should be to try as best as possible within reason to keep the children in school or to get them back to school [...] if you look at the data the spread among children and from children is not really big at
UNICEF: "Data from 191 countries shows no consistent link between reopening schools and increased rates of coronavirus
The outrage is not that she fit better. The outrage is that she stated very firmly on national television with no caveat, that there are no conditions not improved by exercise. Many people with viral sequelae have been saying for years that exercise has made them more disabled 1/
And the new draft NICE guidelines for ME/CFS which often has a viral onset specifically say that ME/CFS patients shouldn't do graded exercise. Clare is fully aware of this but still made a sweeping and very firm statement that all conditions are improved by exercise. This 2/
was an active dismissal of the lived experience of hundreds of thousands of patients with viral sequelae. Yes, exercise does help so many conditions. Yes, a very small number of people with an ME/CFS diagnosis are helped by exercise. But the vast majority of people with ME, a 3/
a quintessential post-viral condition, are made worse by exercise. Many have been left wheelchair dependent of bedbound by graded exercise therapy when they could walk before. To dismiss the lived experience of these patients with such a sweeping statement is unethical and 4/
unsafe. Clare has every right to her lived experience. But she can't, and you can't justifiably speak out on favour of listening to lived experience but cherry pick the lived experiences you are going to listen to. Why are the lived experiences of most people with ME dismissed?
Why is it such a source of collective outrage that a person with fatigue following a viral illness gets better?https://t.co/5lcwQBPLU5
— Trisha Greenhalgh \U0001f637 #CovidIsAirborne (@trishgreenhalgh) January 30, 2021
And the new draft NICE guidelines for ME/CFS which often has a viral onset specifically say that ME/CFS patients shouldn't do graded exercise. Clare is fully aware of this but still made a sweeping and very firm statement that all conditions are improved by exercise. This 2/
was an active dismissal of the lived experience of hundreds of thousands of patients with viral sequelae. Yes, exercise does help so many conditions. Yes, a very small number of people with an ME/CFS diagnosis are helped by exercise. But the vast majority of people with ME, a 3/
a quintessential post-viral condition, are made worse by exercise. Many have been left wheelchair dependent of bedbound by graded exercise therapy when they could walk before. To dismiss the lived experience of these patients with such a sweeping statement is unethical and 4/
unsafe. Clare has every right to her lived experience. But she can't, and you can't justifiably speak out on favour of listening to lived experience but cherry pick the lived experiences you are going to listen to. Why are the lived experiences of most people with ME dismissed?
Normally I enjoy the high standards of journalism in @guardian . Not today as disappointed with misleading headline that suggest infections are spreading fastest in children. It'll worry parents/teachers & I doubt most readers will unpick the
The latest REACT1 report shows prevalence of infection in ALL age groups has fallen, including children aged 5-12 from 1.59% in Round 8 to 0.86% in Round 9a. The authors of REACT1 report also (wisely) didn't try to interpret the prevalence figures.
If this were a research trial you wouldn't place much weight on the age differences in % prevalence because of the wide confidence intervals, i.e. differences weren't statistically significant.
3/
I've previously tweeted on the challenges (& dangers) of interpreting surveillance data. One would need lots more contextual info to make sense of it & arrive at sound
Undoubtedly some will extrapolate from the prevalence of infection figures in children to other settings i.e. schools based on the headline. I'd advise caution as there is a real risk of over-interpretation through extrapolation of limited data. Association is not causation.
5/
The latest REACT1 report shows prevalence of infection in ALL age groups has fallen, including children aged 5-12 from 1.59% in Round 8 to 0.86% in Round 9a. The authors of REACT1 report also (wisely) didn't try to interpret the prevalence figures.
If this were a research trial you wouldn't place much weight on the age differences in % prevalence because of the wide confidence intervals, i.e. differences weren't statistically significant.
3/
I've previously tweeted on the challenges (& dangers) of interpreting surveillance data. One would need lots more contextual info to make sense of it & arrive at sound
Misinterpretation of surveillance data is a serious issue. Surveillance data needs to come with a warning label - Open to biases - interpret with caution! Some may not realize that surveillance often does not measure all infection, it's a proxy for actual disease incidence.
— Andrew Lee (@andrewleedr) February 14, 2021
1/
Undoubtedly some will extrapolate from the prevalence of infection figures in children to other settings i.e. schools based on the headline. I'd advise caution as there is a real risk of over-interpretation through extrapolation of limited data. Association is not causation.
5/
You May Also Like
So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.
The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.
This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.
The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."
This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.
If everyone was holding bitcoin on the old x86 in their parents basement, we would be finding a price bottom. The problem is the risk is all pooled at a few brokerages and a network of rotten exchanges with counter party risk that makes AIG circa 2008 look like a good credit.
— Greg Wester (@gwestr) November 25, 2018
The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.
This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.
The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."
This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.
