Categories Society
Tomorrow we will formally apply to join #CPTPP \U0001f1ec\U0001f1e7
— Liz Truss (@trussliz) January 31, 2021
Membership will help drive an export- led, jobs-led recovery across \U0001f1ec\U0001f1e7 bringing more opportunities to trade with fast growing Pacific nations. \U0001f30e
Read more here\U0001f447https://t.co/5sQhgW4vCM
Here's my more realistic take on CPTPP. Economic gains limited, but politically in terms of trade this makes some sort of sense, these are likely allies. DIT doesn't say this, presumably the idea of Australia or Canada as our equal upsets them.
Gather UK application to join CPTPP is finally about to be announced, not that it was exactly a secret. Economic value limited given distance and existing UK deals, not a particularly strong or modern agreement in areas of UK strength like services, but...
— David Henig (@DavidHenigUK) January 30, 2021
As previously noted agriculture interests in Australia and New Zealand expect us to reach generous agreements in WTO talks and bilaterals before acceding to CPTPP. So this isn't a definite. Oh and Australia wants to know if we'll allow hormone treated beef
Ultimately trade deals are political, and the UK really wants CPTPP as part of the pivot to indo-pacific, and some adherents also hope it forces us to change food laws without having to do it in a US deal (isn't certain if this is the case or not).
If we can accede to CPTPP without having to make changes to domestic laws it is fine. Just shouldn't be our priority, as it does little for services, is geographically remote, and hardly cutting edge on issues like climate change or animal welfare.
Irrational anger & outrage which is easily manipulated, as we see being done, into tribal affiliation. Predicated not on some devotion to core ideals & principles of the country, but something else.
Notice what ea side appeals how they express it.
Wait for it, we\u2019re about to unleash 73 MILLION of this guy! https://t.co/34x0rTzC77
— President-Elect Lynn \u2b50\ufe0f\u2b50\ufe0f\u2b50\ufe0f (@lynnemiles01) November 20, 2020
One side largely is moved by wanting a system, a society, a government that is responsive to the situation and needs of the public. This has a number of aspects, from infrastructure, taking care of the environment, BLM, taking care of the 'least among us' &etc.
These folks...
These folks on "the other side"... Not sure what to call this other side. It is a collection of right wing people, some who are simply "members" by affiliation, by tradition, by location in the country...others by reasoned choice.
However they get there, a large % are like this.
Lets call this the Trumpian side, Trumper Cohort, since that is the current center around which these "73M" are organized.
Within this cohort, there are many who are simply "Republicans" by inertia. Their family has been so forever, and so they are too. In actual fact they
do not like what is being done in their name, wonder what happened to the party, but cannot imagine voting for a "Democrat", no more than the feud over Ford vs Chevy would resolve in welcoming in the other 'team'.
These don't really know or und what a "Democrat" is these days,
Let\u2019s not forget that the former #1 and #2 at LA County Sheriff are doing time in Federal prison for interfering with an FBI investigation.
— Chad Loder (@chadloder) January 14, 2021
Ramsey County sheriff Bob Fletcher has been in the, ah, news recently, but back in 2008 he was the arch villain of the RNC protests, raiding all my "co-conspirators," doing interrogations where he acted like he was on 24, and screaming to the media about terrorism.
Because Fletcher is a quintessential dipshit chud you may be tempted to believe this was all him going off half-cocked. Indeed this became kinda the media narrative, insofar as they pushed back on him at all.
The reality however is more that Fletcher was a useful tool to the FBI
First, it's important to note that the RNC (and the DNC) as a rule donate massive piles of money to local police forces at their conventions to *insure* them against lawsuits. This was the case in 2008, I don't remember the exact figure but on the order of 10 million USD.
Now the Welcoming Committee was an anarchist project to organize protest infrastructure and was aboveground and open to the public. This meant we had to deal with multiple undercovers / informants from jurisdictions often competing with each other. You just make them wash dishes!
1. Where to look
https://t.co/dKQvqzeb6F is my top recommend. Great searching, treats escorts well, high volume
Slixa and Eros are also good, but would recommend Eros as a last resort, only if you have low amounts of escorts in your area and can't find any on other sites.
For escorts, price is def correlated with quality. The median rate of escorts is usually around $3-500/hr, but usually is higher in bigger/wealthier US cities. The higher the price, the lower volume (amount of clients she sees per week) she's likely to be, very roughly speaking.
2. Read her website. She might have common questions answered. Sometimes photos are more flattering than she'll look irl - my clients often cited 30-50% of girls they met, looked like their photos. She typically will have an email or a scheduling form.
3. Most established girls want references from other girls you've seen. If you don't have this yet, you'll probably have to give her proof of your income and identity so she can run it through blacklists to check. If she doesn't do this, this is a red flag for your safety too.
It doesn't help that the government have, & are continuing to, lie their way through the pandemic.
But that doesn't mean Ag-LFDs are all bad...
A thread 👇
1/
MHRA yesterday ruled that Ag-LFDs should not be used in schools to regularly test contacts of cases to reduce time spent in isolation.
This is a risky approach, & there is no data of the effectiveness (or cost-effectiveness), so this a fair decision.
This ruling, while probably correct & fair, will likely further damage public trust in testing, particularly as the debate rages on with government saying one thing and the MHRA another.
So, I thought it time for me to cut through the noise & ask - What does the data show?
3/
Much of the discourse over the past few months has been obsessing over the ‘poor’ performance of Ag-LFDs.
The principal argument has been that the Liverpool testing pilot showed they only find 40% of infections. But does this figure actually show us anything meaningful?
4/
The Liverpool community testing pilot evaluated asymptomatic testing using Ag-LFDs. They ran a sub-sample of tests of 5689 individuals, from 48 different testing sites, which were swabbed (supervised self-swab) for Ag-LFD and PCR side by side.
https://t.co/W8Rksg3dql
5/
We\u2019re deeply disappointed in World Rugby\u2019s decision to move ahead with proposals to stop most trans women playing in competitions they govern.
— stonewalluk (@stonewalluk) October 9, 2020
We stand in solidarity with those who will feel shut out from the sport they love.https://t.co/Mm2hT5UCxO
As soon as I get some fitness back I’ll be joining a male 5-a-side football team openly & proudly as a trans player. Such an approach is truly progressive. It fully respects diversity & inclusion including the differences & uniqueness of women, of trans players & men but without
disadvantaging or excluding women from basic considerations of safety, dignity and sporting opportunity.
Only by mutual respect for each groups’ right to sporting opportunity, safety, fairness & dignity can we replace rancour with empathy & division with understanding.
Trans people, rightly, are more widely accepted as trans people today but the authoritarian lie that TWAW & in all circumstances, regardless of the evidence of harm/potential harm to women in many arenas, continues to cause justifiable anger & fear, the soil in which intolerance>
grows. This unjust, even totalitarian demand, TWAW, will continue to fail to gain universal acceptance because it’s based on a falsehood, one in (a mentally unhealthy) denial of the biological reality, lived experiences, rights, uniqueness & therefore the full humanity of women>