Sally Hines' evidence to the WESC.

'I do not accept that male violence is a thing.'

https://t.co/79KG1w83OB

Stephen Whittle.

'I consider female people having any spaces or services to themselves, or being able to stipulate intimate care from people of their own sex, to be a legal abhorrence.'

https://t.co/MO9NVW3XpK
'Stonewall considers allowing ppl access to the spaces and services of the other sex on the basis of nothing but self declaration regardless of the obvious ways this can be abused and the evidence that it already has been to be sensible.'

https://t.co/QWsEayzeXd
'We still don't understand the law'
'Yeah, we really don't understand the law.'
Alex Sharpe

'Yeah, I know our biggest lobby group just submitted evidence that the EA gives trans women access to women's spaces but actually, the EA says the opposite, and people only think that b/c of those lying feminist witches.'

Um. Okay.

https://t.co/m6benY3chG
Fucking incredible.

Stonewall argues that 'gender reassignment' in the EA gives access to women's spaces and exclusion is only allowed in exceptional individual circumstances.

*And have been going around the country giving most of our public institutions training disseminating
this version of the law.*

Sharpe then argues that the EA allows exclusion, and that the only reason why women think there is a threat to their spaces is because we got out knickers in a big moral panicky twist.

Yeah. Right. Nothing to do with Stonewall. Of course.
CAN YOU JOKERS GET YOUR STORY STRAIGHT FOR ONE SECOND????
Brighton Survivor's Network. This is the only rape crisis service in Brighton.

'Please abolish female only spaces in law yes we are supposed to care for female survivors of male violence but fuck those bigoted bitches.'

JFC. Jesus Christ.

Shame on you.

https://t.co/AAWSgNSj52
Look at this steaming pile of abstruse gaslighting bullshit.

'Defining womanhood' = 'Defining female people'

'By conformity to state-sponsored specification' = By being female.

= 'Defining female people as female is *archaic*'

F absolute FS.
'We are committed to the ideology redefining female ppl on the basis of their conformity to gender stereotypes and to the human rights of all survivors providing they are not female survivors of male violence who want to be supported in a female-only environment'
'They are going to rape you anyway.'

FROM A SURVIVORS SERVICE.

There is no string of expletives at my disposal sufficient to express how fucking disgusting this is.
Mermaids. Singing from Stonewall's hymn sheet. Obviously didn't check with Alex Sharpe.
'Don't worry women, you'll still be allowed female only services for things like Rape Crisis, the law says so.... oh, did the Survivor's Network say that anyone who wants a female only service is a nasty bitch, um, nothing to do with us.'

https://t.co/NvdueqI3YK
So we have a bunch of submissions which argue that none of this effects women's services and only lying feminists would say that, which also includes *submissions from women's services which show that their ideology has already destroyed them.*
This is a perfect illustration of what has been going on these last years.

Simultaneously talking out of both sides of their mouths. Telling us that there is no impact on our spaces and we're evil and hysterical to suggest it, while also saying they have access to all our spaces
anyway, and managers of women's services writing submissions explaining how those services already no longer exist, and while you're here, can you abolish the the exemptions.

Yeah. We're just imagining it. Right. Of course. Crazy women.

You gaslighting assholes.

More from Dr. Jane Clare Jones

To the small group of women, many of whom have platforms to protect, who are intent on throwing other women under the bus.

1. That a small number of transitioned trans women have been using women's spaces for a long time is not the same as the impact of a new rights movement


that demands that *anybody is a women only on the basis of self-declaration* and explicitly includes cross-dressers under the trans umbrella. There was less than 5000 people who received a GRC. The estimates of the numbers of cross-dressers in the male population is around 4%.

THAT is a MASSIVE difference.

2. Therefore, any comments you make re: women's current resistance are irrelevant. We are not responding to the same thing.

3. Calling women's concerns about the number of males who may now have access to their intimate spaces 'hysteria'

immediately discredits you as a feminist. (Hello Judy!)

4. Female people are socialised into the rapeable class. They are subjected to objectification and violation from childhood, and especially from their early teens. This has a massive impact on


mental health and sense of their own personhood. Many of us experience being female as fucking traumatic. We *do not* share this experience with people who go through childhood and puberty as males, and whose impression of what 'being female' means is informed by patriarchal
Hmmmm, disinformation... like?:

1. Intersex people are neither male or female
2. Intersex people prove that sex is a spectrum, or that male people are female
3. Sex is a cultural, or historical concept, and didn't exist before the colonisation of the Americas


4. All gender non-conforming people that existed throughout history are trans in the modern sense, even though that concept didn't exist and they didn't identify as such
5. Gender identity is a scientifically verified concept
6. There is no possible reason why young people

might experience distress with their body or gendered expectations other than them being trans, and that exploring those reasons is tantamount to conversion therapy
7. There is not a significant desistance rate in young people with gender dysphoria if they are not medicalised

8. Puberty blockers are just a pause button
9. Puberty blockers are totally safe and there is tons of medical evidence that the treatment has good outcomes
10. Women are not oppressed on the basis of their sex
11. Gender identification completely

overrides sex in all and every possible instance. There are no salient sex-based patterns either in physicality or behaviour that means we should continue to organise anything by sex.
12. People who continue to think that sex exists and is salient could only be motivated by
@PennyRed @OpheliaBenson @jk_rowling @bindelj No Laurie, you have repeatedly used the kind of monstering rhetoric towards us that many of the people who have repeatedly threatened, harassed and intimidated Julie and thousands of other women do.

When this is repeatedly brought to your attention you disavow the fact that

@OpheliaBenson @jk_rowling @bindelj calling women terfs, fascists, nazis, in league with the far right, etc etc, is rhetoric associated a broad campaign of harassment and intimidation, disavow the violence, and then carry right on with the rhetoric.

We've watched you do this for years. We've also watched you

@OpheliaBenson @jk_rowling @bindelj repeatedly claim you don't understand our position, and don't understand why we think your complicity with the erasure of female people as a sex class makes your feminism incoherent. We have explained all this to you at length, and you somehow, cannot grasp it, and then carry on

@OpheliaBenson @jk_rowling @bindelj calling us fascists.

Perhaps when women who have been on the receiving end of extreme abuse by trans rights activists for years, review your book, and find your feminism wanting, and then you turn around and claim victimhood, perhaps that's a little bit galling. Perhaps when

@OpheliaBenson @jk_rowling @bindelj you are siding with people who have been repeatedly accusing women of 'weaponising their trauma' because they want space free from males, we find it EXTREMELY GALLING for you to appeal to your trauma when you got some shitty book reviews.

Joanne Rowling is a survivor of sexual

More from Society

It is simply not correct to point fingers at wind & solar energy as we try to understand the situation in TX. The system (almost) had a plan for weather (almost) like this. 1/x


It relied on very little wind energy - that was the plan. It relied on a lot of natural gas - that was the plan. It relied on all of its nuclear energy - that was the plan. 2/x

There was enough natural gas, coal and nuclear capacity installed to survive this event - it was NOT "forced out" by the wind energy expansion. It was there. 3/x

Wind, natural gas, coal and nuclear plants all failed to deliver on their expectations for long periods of time. The biggest gap was in natural gas! The generators were there, but they were not able to deliver. 4/x

It may be fair to ask why there is so much wind energy in ERCOT if we do NOT expect it to deliver during weather events like this, but that is an entirely different question - and one with a lot of great answers!! 5/x

You May Also Like