IMPORTANCE OF PADMAPURAN AND ITS BENEFITS.
Next Brahmaji describes Padmapuraan. Just as five senses adorn our body similarly this Puraan is divided into five parts. This Puraan has fifty five thousand shlokas. In this book Rishi Pulastya describes the principles of nature

The Bhumikhand part discusses about the story of Shivsharma based on respect to parents, stories about Suvrat, Ven, Pruthu, Sunitha, Dharma, Nahush, Yayati, Guritirth, Jaimini, Ashok Sundari,
The next part is Swarg khand which starts with a dialogue between Muni Sauti and other Maharishi's about the evolution of earth and also refers to the placing of different loks and tirtha's.
Pataal khand is about Shri Ram, Pulastya vansh, glory of Jagannath, Vrindavan, Shri Hari leela,
In Uttarkhand we find Parvatopakhyan by Shiva to Parvati, Jalandhar, Shrishaila glory and the story of King Sagar.
Whoever reads or listens to Padmapuraan gets all his wishes fulfilled.
Instagram link👇
https://t.co/saeztq5gM2
Facebook Link 👇
https://t.co/OmSGZZUWkL
https://t.co/j59UuCir0G
\u092a\u0926\u094d\u092e\u092a\u0941\u0930\u093e\u0923 \u0914\u0930 \u0907\u0938\u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093e\u092d \u0915\u093e \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094d\u0935\u0964
— \u092a\u0902\u0921\u093f\u0924 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u093e\u0932 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u094b\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f (@VishalS50533075) December 22, 2020
\u0905\u0917\u0932\u093e \u092c\u094d\u0930\u0939\u094d\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0940 \u092a\u0926\u094d\u092e\u092a\u0941\u0930\u093e\u0923 \u0915\u093e \u0935\u0930\u094d\u0923\u0928 \u0915\u0930\u0924\u0947 \u0939\u0948\u0902\u0964 \u091c\u093f\u0938 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0901\u091a \u0907\u0902\u0926\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901 \u0939\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u0936\u0930\u0940\u0930 \u0915\u094b \u0938\u0941\u0936\u094b\u092d\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0924\u0940 \u0939\u0948\u0902 \u0909\u0938\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u0939 \u092a\u0941\u0930\u093e\u0923 \u092a\u093e\u0901\u091a \u092d\u093e\u0917\u094b\u0902 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0935\u093f\u092d\u093e\u091c\u093f\u0924 \u0939\u0948\u0964 pic.twitter.com/e7mCCmi8l0
More from Anshul Pandey

https://t.co/64r7BmTN6N

https://t.co/vwg4NFMYgy

https://t.co/CtFXR0TNrx

Instagram link👇
https://t.co/0E8eGSiUmr
Facebook link👇
https://t.co/j1XLUq4oBM
#InspiredBySwamiAnjaninandanDass
#MahabharatPositivity - Sabha Parva

https://t.co/Nk49jADuXS

https://t.co/CqYE2aVHCI

Instagram link👇
https://t.co/UmeHgDSP0a
Facebook page link👇
https://t.co/LFtkDQeBvI
Happy Bhai Dooj to all!
#InspiredBySwamiAnjaninandanDass
Just in case if you have not subscribed to my youtube channel, please do subscribe, I have already posted 9 Videos till now on different subjects, Specially Mythbusters topics. Do watch them and give your feedback in comments
More from Religion
A lot of things Muslims do now and claim as Islamic rule is actually a culture that Islam curtailed or tried to perfect.
— Sule Nana (@izesule) January 2, 2021
Let's talk polygamy.
Islam didn't come and say, "oh men, marry four wives"
No.
Polygamy was in existence, long before the coming of Islam.
1. First off, a disclaimer. Should you feel hurt by my words in the course of the thread, then forgive me. It’s from me and not from Islam. And I probably have to improve on my delivery. And I may not quote you verbatim, but the intended meaning would be there. Thank You!
2. Standing on Imam Shafii’s quote: “And I never debated anyone but that I did not mind whether Allah clarified the truth on my tongue or his tongue” or “I never once debated anyone hoping to win the debate; rather I always wished that the truth would come from his side.”
3. Okay, into the meat (my love for meat is showing. Lol) of the thread. Even though you didn’t mention the verse that permitted polygamy, everyone knows the verse you were talking about (Q4:3).

4. Your reasons for the revelation of the verse are strange. The first time I came across such. I had to quickly consult the books on the exegeses or tafsir of the Quran written by renowned specialists!
❶/12 Roughly speaking, primitive Buddhism was about liberation from the inner suffering of the ordained individual. In contrast, Mahayana Buddhism, especially the teachings of the Lotus Sutra, emphasises 'the salvation of all people, together'.
Bodhisattva is also important for understanding the Japanese. It was a very developed in Mahayana Buddhism. Liberators keep putting off and dedicating until all people are saved. This is an ideal prototype. But this devoted tradition is disappearing under the Weimar Constitution. https://t.co/uBTcwOjlWt
— Atsumori \u6566\u76db (@atsumori5834) January 9, 2020
❷/12 In short, people of Mahayana Buddhism do Practice as Bodhisattva for all in the secular world. Strictly, these are different religions, and primitive Buddhism is not well suited to being associated with the state or secular communities.
❸/12 I believe that if anti-secular primitive Buddhism had arrived in ancient Japan it would not have spread very far. In Japan, where rice cultivation is very important, the idea of destroying the community would have been a threat of people's survival.
❹/12 By the way, it's perhaps inevitable that the purity of the teachings will diminish depending on how they are disseminated in society. In other words, I think that, roughly speaking, what develops away from the original form can even become a civilization.
❺/12 But anything that significantly reduces the quality of the original should be called a degeneration. I think that Christian civilization, although flawed, has built a civilization in tension.
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x