Long Answer, keep reading 👇
(Advice from industry experts who I talked to.)
Can you get a job in data science and machine learning without a college degree?
🧵👇
In order to add value, you'll need skills. Simple as that.
Get the skills to provide value and you'll get the job.
A college degree makes it easier to get the skills to get a job in machine learning or data science.
College degrees have their own place
- The theoretical part which mainly includes math
- The practical part which includes programming skills
- An understanding of the industry in which one is applying machine learning and data science
Math is important, but not when you are starting out. You can learn math as and when you need it, programming is actually the more important part.
This is more important than you think it is.
Python, R and Julia are some of the options out there.
Python is the most recommended for several reasons.
While you are making these models, try to research a bit more about what's going on under the hood.
More from Pratham Prasoon
Do you want to learn the maths for machine learning but don't know where to start?
This thread is for you.
🧵👇
The guide that you will see below is based on resources that I came across, and some of my experiences over the past 2 years or so.
I use these resources and they will (hopefully) help you in understanding the theoretical aspects of machine learning very well.
Before diving into maths, I suggest first having solid programming skills in Python.
Read this thread for more
These are topics of math you'll have to focus on for machine learning👇
- Trigonometry & Algebra
These are the main pre-requisites for other topics on this list.
(There are other pre-requites but these are the most common)
- Linear Algebra
To manipulate and represent data.
- Calculus
To train and optimize your machine learning model, this is very important.
This thread is for you.
🧵👇
The guide that you will see below is based on resources that I came across, and some of my experiences over the past 2 years or so.
I use these resources and they will (hopefully) help you in understanding the theoretical aspects of machine learning very well.
Before diving into maths, I suggest first having solid programming skills in Python.
Read this thread for more
Are you planning to learn Python for machine learning this year?
— Pratham Prasoon (@PrasoonPratham) February 13, 2021
Here's everything you need to get started.
\U0001f9f5\U0001f447
These are topics of math you'll have to focus on for machine learning👇
- Trigonometry & Algebra
These are the main pre-requisites for other topics on this list.
(There are other pre-requites but these are the most common)
- Linear Algebra
To manipulate and represent data.
- Calculus
To train and optimize your machine learning model, this is very important.
More from Machine learning
This is a Twitter series on #FoundationsOfML.
❓ Today, I want to start discussing the different types of Machine Learning flavors we can find.
This is a very high-level overview. In later threads, we'll dive deeper into each paradigm... 👇🧵
Last time we talked about how Machine Learning works.
Basically, it's about having some source of experience E for solving a given task T, that allows us to find a program P which is (hopefully) optimal w.r.t. some metric
According to the nature of that experience, we can define different formulations, or flavors, of the learning process.
A useful distinction is whether we have an explicit goal or desired output, which gives rise to the definitions of 1️⃣ Supervised and 2️⃣ Unsupervised Learning 👇
1️⃣ Supervised Learning
In this formulation, the experience E is a collection of input/output pairs, and the task T is defined as a function that produces the right output for any given input.
👉 The underlying assumption is that there is some correlation (or, in general, a computable relation) between the structure of an input and its corresponding output and that it is possible to infer that function or mapping from a sufficiently large number of examples.
❓ Today, I want to start discussing the different types of Machine Learning flavors we can find.
This is a very high-level overview. In later threads, we'll dive deeper into each paradigm... 👇🧵
Last time we talked about how Machine Learning works.
Basically, it's about having some source of experience E for solving a given task T, that allows us to find a program P which is (hopefully) optimal w.r.t. some metric
I'm starting a Twitter series on #FoundationsOfML. Today, I want to answer this simple question.
— Alejandro Piad Morffis (@AlejandroPiad) January 12, 2021
\u2753 What is Machine Learning?
This is my preferred way of explaining it... \U0001f447\U0001f9f5
According to the nature of that experience, we can define different formulations, or flavors, of the learning process.
A useful distinction is whether we have an explicit goal or desired output, which gives rise to the definitions of 1️⃣ Supervised and 2️⃣ Unsupervised Learning 👇
1️⃣ Supervised Learning
In this formulation, the experience E is a collection of input/output pairs, and the task T is defined as a function that produces the right output for any given input.
👉 The underlying assumption is that there is some correlation (or, in general, a computable relation) between the structure of an input and its corresponding output and that it is possible to infer that function or mapping from a sufficiently large number of examples.
Thanks for this incredibly helpful analysis @dgurdasani1
Two questions. 1/ Does this summarise the AZ published data :
The plan is to extend the time interval for all age groups despite it being largely untested on the over 55yrs, although the full data is not yet published
Do we have the actual numbers of over 55yr olds given a 2nd dose at c12 weeks and the accompanying efficacy data?
Not to mention the efficacy data of the full first dose over that same period?
I’d quite like to know whether I am to be a guinea pig & the ongoing risks to manage
You attached photos of excerpts from a paper. Could you attach the link?
Re Pfizer. As I understand it the most efficacious interval for dosing was investigated at the start of the trial.
Here’s the link to the
I’ve got to say that this way of making and announcing decisions is not inspiring confidence in me and I am very pro vaccination as a matter of principle, not least because my brother caught polio before vaccinations available.
Two questions. 1/ Does this summarise the AZ published data :
The plan is to extend the time interval for all age groups despite it being largely untested on the over 55yrs, although the full data is not yet published
SUMMARY: the Oxford/Astra trial examined dosing with gaps between 4-12 wks- although longer gaps appear to be limited mostly to younger participants. There was no difference reported in published data between these & efficacy from the 1st dose seems high for severe disease.
— Deepti Gurdasani (@dgurdasani1) December 31, 2020
Do we have the actual numbers of over 55yr olds given a 2nd dose at c12 weeks and the accompanying efficacy data?
Not to mention the efficacy data of the full first dose over that same period?
I’d quite like to know whether I am to be a guinea pig & the ongoing risks to manage
You attached photos of excerpts from a paper. Could you attach the link?
Re Pfizer. As I understand it the most efficacious interval for dosing was investigated at the start of the trial.
Discussions of 1 vs 2 doses suggest many are not aware of Pfizer's trials which evaluated 1 vs 2 dose immunogenicity, assessed multiple formulations (BNT162b1 BNT162b2 etc) & conducted dose-ranging in both young & old adults at the start. Saw "clear benefit of booster at day 21" pic.twitter.com/mpyxu9xFSF
— Dr Nicole E Basta (@IDEpiPhD) December 31, 2020
Here’s the link to the
I’ve got to say that this way of making and announcing decisions is not inspiring confidence in me and I am very pro vaccination as a matter of principle, not least because my brother caught polio before vaccinations available.
