I went from 900 to 125,000 followers in 12 months.

But 90% of that growth came from 9 threads - which on their own generated 20,000,000 views.

So here's a recap of those 9 threads (and what they can help you with):

I studied math at Princeton - mostly because I hated writing.

But colleges do a horrendous job teaching you to write.

So I spent 200 hours learning to write on my own.

Then, I summarized the frameworks I learned:

https://t.co/PxJqFGYJdG
If you're new to Twitter, it can be overwhelming.

But even people who use it every day aren't using its best features.

So here are 10 of them you can start using today to 10x your experience:

https://t.co/0ecf6MHw5a
Whether you're a:

• Writer
• Creator
• Student
• Employee
• Entrepreneur

You are in the business of storytelling.

So here's a storytelling crash course from the world's most creative company:

https://t.co/enfDNj3agt
If you spend any time on Twitter, you've seen the words "Web 3."

But whether you're a complete beginner or fully crypto-pilled, these quotes will help you learn where the world is headed:

https://t.co/PBcZOgDS9W
If you use it right, you can learn anything on Twitter.

So I scoured the archives to find some of the hidden features of the internet's most popular tools:

https://t.co/TJ4QGqlFFv
I wanted to learn the art of capturing, keeping, and monetizing attention - using writing.

So I immersed myself in the writings of the world's best copywriter.

Here's what I found:

https://t.co/WhA93Ccza7
For over 1,200 days in a row, I've journaled on a high-quality question.

So I compiled the 21 best questions to reflect on as we close 2021:

https://t.co/yWygYY6SGB
Atomic Habits was the best book I read in 2020.

But while reading is good, application is better.

So here's how to use the frameworks from that book to build a writing habit:

https://t.co/P3RMSIlswk
Now, we're heading into a new year.

And it's the time of year to fall into the "planning" trap.

So before you spend weeks and months trying to make the perfect plan, read this story of 2 men learning to fish:

https://t.co/2rvF6uO26Y
Now, these 9 threads were outliers.

But I wrote *every day* in 2021 (giving myself more shots on goal).

And I can attribute just about every good thing that's happened in my life to writing and publishing every day.
After seeing the benefits writing unlocked for me, I wanted to help others start too.

And over the last year, I've helped over 2,000 writers start writing online.

So if you're looking to kickstart 2022 by writing online, there are 7 days left to join:

https://t.co/JJNKZQKb75
Along the way, I've learned a lot about what makes for effective digital writing.

And I compiled every framework into this free 13,000-word ultimate guide.

Check it out:
https://t.co/34AcQYuW3r
And if you can't get to all of these today...

Jump back to the top tweet and bookmark it for later (or retweet to share with others):

https://t.co/IpMDiGZrCY

More from Dickie Bush 🚢

Atomic Habits from @jamesclear changed my life.

In Atomic Habits, James lays out the Four Laws of Behavior Change.

1. Make it obvious
2. Make it attractive
3. Make it easy
4. Make it satisfying

Here's how to leverage them to build a daily writing habit (🧵✍🏼):

Habits are made up of a four-part feedback loop:

1. Cue
2. Craving
3. Response
4. Reward

Building a habit means intentionally designing each part of this feedback loop.

1. Make it obvious
2. Make it attractive
3. Make it easy
4. Make it


Before you start to build a writing habit, it's important to understand the real goal.

Your goal isn't to start writing.

Your goal is to become a writer.

Why the subtle difference?

Because behavior change is identity change.

We don't stick to habits that aren't aligned with our identity.

Luckily, habits that align with your identity are easy to stick to.

Every action you take is a vote for the type of person you want to become.

So to become a writer, we have to consistently cast "writer votes."

Step 1: Make it obvious

Time and location are the most important habit cues.

You MUST leverage them to build your writing habit.

Every great writer has their sacred hours.

This thread can help you find

More from Learning

You May Also Like

Great article from @AsheSchow. I lived thru the 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's/early 1990's asking myself "Has eveyrbody lost their GODDAMN MINDS?!"


The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.

1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!

2) "Repressed memory" syndrome

3) Facilitated Communication [FC]

All 3 led to massive abuse.

"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.

Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.

FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.