X : Can you apply pace layers to maps?
Me : You can but what is where evolves. However, same rules apply to things, practices, data, knowledge and ethical values. All are forms of evolving capital. In the mapping world, we refer to this with pioneers, settlers and town planners.

X : What's the robot for?
Me : Image from an older presentation slide, don't worry it has no relevance.
X : Is this linked to diffusion?
Me : Not simply. Evolution of a single component can consist of many hundreds of diffusion curves i.e. a virus diffuses but it also evolves.
X : Why have you got DevOps in legacy? We haven't even started yet.
Me : That's not my problem. I would take a look at serverless.
X : DevOps is serverless.
Me : Some of the practices maybe co-opted (see ITIL vs DevOps) but the new faction will decide what it is or isn't.
X : I also disagree with your methods graphic.
Me : Do you mean this? As applied to the following map?
X : Yes. Lean is suitable for innovation.
Me : Ah, that depends upon what you mean by innovation. If you mean Genesis then lightweight XP has it beat.
X : I disagree.
Me : Well, I've had 15 years of people telling me that Agile works everywhere or Lean works everywhere or Six Sigma works everywhere and why all the competing methods don't. I have no interest in the conversation. Use appropriate methods based upon context.
X : "what you mean by innovation"??

Me :
Genesis of a new act == Innovation

Every custom built == Innovation

Feature differentiation in a product == Innovation

Shift from product to utility model == Innovation

... which "innovation" do you mean? They are not the same.
So, sure you can say "Lean is great for innovation" in the same way someone can say "Agile is great for innovation" ... they're both true, just we're not talking about the same "innovation". It's one word with many meanings.
Each of the methods should be evolving to become ideally suited to a specific context ...
X : "Should be?"
Me : Well, people keep trying to make the magic one size fits all i.e. SAFe.
X : Does that work?
Me : Opposing beliefs in one method with no understanding of context? No.
... it's why we will need Agile 2.0
X : What's in Agile 2.0?
Me : It should be identical to XP but without the add-on baggage to make it work everywhere.
X : You mean XP?
Me : Yes. Lightweight XP is the new Agile.
X : But that was old Agile.
Me : Minus 20 years of consultants.
X : But McKinsey ...
Me : Hang on.
X : What are you doing?
Me : Making bread.
X : What? We were having a conversation.
Me : No we weren't. Well, not one that I'm interested in. Bread is so much more exciting.
X : When is that map using multiple methods from?
Me : This one?
X : Yes
Me : 2012 / 13? You'd have to ask @GoAgileGov
X : You've been using multiple methods since 2012?
Me : Oh, no. I've been using multiple methods since 2005/06.
X : Have you spoken on this before?
Me : Endless times. I've even written papers on this (Butler Group Review etc) circa 2007/08? Lots in the open source world.
X : Why haven't I seen this?
Me : Things take time to spread. We obviously walk in different circles.
X : HBR?
Me : LOL
X : Is this applicable to other things?
Me : Practices, Data, Knowledge, Ethics .. hell, you can even map culture and economic systems.
X : Economic?
Me : Yep. No one size fits all - laissez faire vs centrally planned is the old new "agile vs six sigma". Hint is "apply context".

More from Simon Wardley

"Fifty-nine percent of those polled said they believed China will become more powerful than the U.S. within 10 years" - https://t.co/3vN4I1TjwP ... I hate to break it to you but it already is in many areas.

When I published this work (originally from 2015) -
https://t.co/GYOItA3StZ - I did tend to get a lot of pushback from US folk when presenting it.

Six years later, less so.


I expect China to start to tackle inequality this year. It's the Achilles heel of the West. We have no response, nor Governments with the required skill, strategy or practice to respond.

We will ultimately face a more advanced, more wealthy and more equal society ...

... as that example of what "is possible" / "good looks like" shift to the East, we will face a painful shift as we question our own values including our kind of democracy. But in reality, the problem is not with our values but our shockingly poor standards of leadership.

X : Is this because of Trump?
Me : No, this has been going on since the 1990s. There has been no effective counterplay to the long game that Deng Xiaoping started. Just hubris, arrogance and exceptionalism with annual Economist articles on "How China will fall".

More from Internet

We’ve spent the last ten months building #CitizenBrowser, a project that aims to peek inside the Black Box of social media algorithms, by building a nationwide panel to share data with us. Today, we are publishing our first story from the project. /1

.@corintxt crunched the numbers and found that after Facebook flipped the switch for political ads, partisan content elbowed out reputable news outlets in our panelists’ news feeds.
https://t.co/Z0kibSBeQZ /2

You can learn more in our methodology, where we describe how we did this and what steps we took to ensure that we preserved the panelists' privacy. https://t.co/UYbTXAjy5i /3

Personally, this project is the culmination of years of experiments trying to figure out how to collect data from social media platforms in a way that can lead to meaningful reporting. I’ve described a couple of highlights below 👇 /4

My first attempt was in 2016 at Propublica, when I was working with @JuliaAngwin . We were interested in seeing if there was a difference in the Ad interests FB disclosed to users in their settings and the interests they showed to marketers. /5

You May Also Like