Categories History
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
Welcome to 1776.
444 and the Winds 💨
The 4 angels, 4 corners, 4 forces.
#PaperPlanes 👉🏻 Swagger, The “I Am The Chosen One,” Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming, Nothing.
117 👉🏻 Binary 3 👉🏻 3 7’s TRUMP 777, Esoteric 7 kingdoms, 7 principles, 7 ruling powers of nature. https://t.co/WS9IryzzM4
444 and the Winds 💨
The 4 angels, 4 corners, 4 forces.
#PaperPlanes 👉🏻 Swagger, The “I Am The Chosen One,” Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming, Nothing.
117 👉🏻 Binary 3 👉🏻 3 7’s TRUMP 777, Esoteric 7 kingdoms, 7 principles, 7 ruling powers of nature. https://t.co/WS9IryzzM4
14. Many of us noted the \u201c1776\u201d Commission to stop \u201cradical indoctrination of our students, and restore PATRIOTIC EDUCATION to our schools\u201d that POTUS just signed 11/2 which matches the\U0001f58a that writes the #1776 is a \u201cMARKER\u201d, BUT not till I was putting in graphic did I find 444!\U0001f60d https://t.co/qb2ogUVuRw pic.twitter.com/ooyCqnjDQG
— Anjill \U0001f54a (@AnjillofLight_) November 4, 2020
This is Lucius Cornelius Sulla, Roman general and dictator. Right-wing strongman of the 90s-70s BCE.
I've been thinking a lot about Sulla this past week, and people like him.
Ever heard of him? I bet not. 1/
You've certainly heard of Julius Caesar who (the story goes) ended the Roman Republic, and was slaughtered by freedom-loving patriots.
But everything Caesar did--marching on Rome, setting up one-man rule, remaking the Senate--had been done by Sulla 40 years before. 2/
So what's the difference? Both men were fantastically wealthy oligarchs--but within that spectrum, Caesar was considered a liberalizer, and Sulla a conservative.
Caesar said he was going to change things; Sulla said he was re-establishing the old ways. 3/
Rome didn't have a written Constitution. Instead they had a set of customs called the "mos maiorum," or "way things are done." We'd call them "norms."
If you asked Sulla and his supporters what they were fighting for, they would've said the mos maiorum.
Which was a lie. 4/
And we KNOW it was a lie, because invading the pomerium (sacred boundary) of Rome was overturning the heaviest norm there was.
Sulla did that in 88 BC, over a personal slight. He was mad he didn't get a generalship.
Is now where I make a modern equivalence? No, I'll wait. 5/
I've been thinking a lot about Sulla this past week, and people like him.
Ever heard of him? I bet not. 1/
Sulla\u2019s March on his own capital #Rome in 88BC and his destruction, chaos and terror led directly to the destruction of the Republic by Pompey and Julius Caesar half a century later. pic.twitter.com/voJSciVSw3
— Paul Harrison (@PaulHar77393852) January 7, 2021
You've certainly heard of Julius Caesar who (the story goes) ended the Roman Republic, and was slaughtered by freedom-loving patriots.
But everything Caesar did--marching on Rome, setting up one-man rule, remaking the Senate--had been done by Sulla 40 years before. 2/
So what's the difference? Both men were fantastically wealthy oligarchs--but within that spectrum, Caesar was considered a liberalizer, and Sulla a conservative.
Caesar said he was going to change things; Sulla said he was re-establishing the old ways. 3/
Rome didn't have a written Constitution. Instead they had a set of customs called the "mos maiorum," or "way things are done." We'd call them "norms."
If you asked Sulla and his supporters what they were fighting for, they would've said the mos maiorum.
Which was a lie. 4/
And we KNOW it was a lie, because invading the pomerium (sacred boundary) of Rome was overturning the heaviest norm there was.
Sulla did that in 88 BC, over a personal slight. He was mad he didn't get a generalship.
Is now where I make a modern equivalence? No, I'll wait. 5/
The British - Chinese Opium wars - Foreign mud Part 1
(Note: the British "elite" made their fortunes with opium and still do 😉)
https://t.co/eeUUJU1hnG
Aaron Hardoon (1851-1931): Business, Opium, Politics and Philanthropy in Republican Shanghai, 1911-1931
Hardoon and Trade Diaspora of Baghdadi Jews
https://t.co/pzOsXyoXKZ
You are looking at a handful of Scottish Opium Traders.
Keswick Family :
An old firm:
https://t.co/XURQUI11nH. Check Governance. 1600's. HBC is still going.
Common founders to HSBC
The Governors is where it's at.
House of #Windsor, #uk "Elite" 🤔
"In the early 1800s, the Brits controlled 90 percent of the #Chinese opium trade".
#British East Indian Company in 1715 till today, mass scale drug addiction was a policy against targeted
The British - Chinese Opium wars - Harrying the Chinese coast Part 2
(Note: the British "elite" made their fortunes with opium and still do 😉)
https://t.co/sZzx2dz4mG
(Note: the British "elite" made their fortunes with opium and still do 😉)
https://t.co/eeUUJU1hnG
Aaron Hardoon (1851-1931): Business, Opium, Politics and Philanthropy in Republican Shanghai, 1911-1931
Hardoon and Trade Diaspora of Baghdadi Jews
https://t.co/pzOsXyoXKZ
You are looking at a handful of Scottish Opium Traders.
Keswick Family :
An old firm:
https://t.co/XURQUI11nH. Check Governance. 1600's. HBC is still going.
Common founders to HSBC
The Governors is where it's at.
House of #Windsor, #uk "Elite" 🤔
"In the early 1800s, the Brits controlled 90 percent of the #Chinese opium trade".
#British East Indian Company in 1715 till today, mass scale drug addiction was a policy against targeted
The British - Chinese Opium wars - Harrying the Chinese coast Part 2
(Note: the British "elite" made their fortunes with opium and still do 😉)
https://t.co/sZzx2dz4mG
Why are civil-mil scholars upset about Austin Lloyd's nomination as the 28th Secretary of Defense?
Consider the nomination of the 3rd Secretary of Defense: George Marshall
[THREAD]
In 1950, Truman wanted to fire the second SecDef, Louis Johnson, and install George Marshall as Secretary of Defense.
There was a problem: when the Department of Defense was created in 1947, section 202 of the 1947 National Security Act (which created the DoD, then called "The National Military Establishment") would not allow recently retired officers to serve as SecDef
https://t.co/bWx4h1OFah
Marshall had only retired as a 5-star General in 1947
Of course, by 1950 Marshall had already served as Secretary of State and had proposed the "Marshall Plan" for the recovery of Europe
Consider the nomination of the 3rd Secretary of Defense: George Marshall
[THREAD]
In 1950, Truman wanted to fire the second SecDef, Louis Johnson, and install George Marshall as Secretary of Defense.
There was a problem: when the Department of Defense was created in 1947, section 202 of the 1947 National Security Act (which created the DoD, then called "The National Military Establishment") would not allow recently retired officers to serve as SecDef
https://t.co/bWx4h1OFah
Marshall had only retired as a 5-star General in 1947
Of course, by 1950 Marshall had already served as Secretary of State and had proposed the "Marshall Plan" for the recovery of Europe