I find it very strange that the same sort of people who look back on the financial crisis and austerity as catalysts for great change now seem to see Brexit and Covid as catalysts for great stability.

Partisanship is one helluva drug. Financial crisis = bad crisis. Brexit = good crisis. Even Covid, unequivocally a bad crisis, is characterised in parts as a good crisis (world beating vaccine etc).
A different reading (which spans Labour, Coalition and Conservative governments) is that 2008-2021 has been one continuous period of crisis punctuated by shorter periods of calm.
Crises aren’t the exception. Scottish independence and the future status of NI look ahead. They are the rule. More specifically, whether the crises are endogenous or exogenous the state has proven woefully ineffective at dealing with them.
We are meant to try to learn from this. And do our best not to apply partisan blinkers. The problems are deeply rooted. And, very obviously, Brexit isn’t the fix. It’s an attempt at a cure but in the same way as a radical therapy that solves some problems but creates others.
I do think the public hive mind gets this. The public (in one incarnation or other) keeps voting for change. Gets it. And then votes next time for more change.
Putting the Brexit vote to one side, would anyone other than political apologists look at the events of the last ten years and argue the British state is fit for purpose for the twenty first century?

(And the more that people attempt to deny this point the worse it gets)
It is noteworthy that a key Brexiteer belief is that the EU is on a necessarily downwards trajectory. And that the U.K. (freed) will necessarily do better. But is the latter point supported by the evidence? It’s not obvious.
Not all of this is unique to the U.K. Europe & the US have their problems. But the US has, at least for the moment, taken a decisive turn away from instability. And the EU, despite all of the countervailing pressures, continues to respond to crises through further evolution.
As ever, there will be opportunities. Given the Brexit deal and the likely end to the Covid crisis, the U.K. is a decent but, especially for domestic focused businesses. And there will be lots of bargains.
But in the medium / long term the jury is still very much out (especially for international focused businesses). An extended period of stability is required. And there seems little prospect of calm in the next five years.
Crises don’t have neat beginnings. And they certainly don’t have neat ends. Their origins and consequences stretch back and forth through time in constant movement.
My small view is that we’re still trying to find a workable post world war shape. Isn’t it obvious that we haven’t? Will we keep reeling from change to change or will there finally be a concerted effort to move in a better, more sustainable direction?
The only thing worse than not changing is for change itself to fail. Further radicalism is, I suspect, the most likely response. Of course, it doesn’t have to be that way. But a better outcome requires honest recognition that why and how we do things has not worked well. /ends
PS re trying to understand this stuff I recommend looking at Joseph Cornell (American artist) boxes. Here is an example.

More from Objective Columnist

I tend to agree with this - of course many things can still go wrong...but (certainly on the UK side) as the list of outstanding issues decreases and as the cost of no deal becomes more apparent deal momentum will increase.


I find it most amusing that people invest so much value in public statements, briefings, tabloid headlines, the tweets of obscure backbenchers etc. Cherchez les fundamentals!

There is a deep vein of analytical pessimism in one particular direction, which, whether correct or not, is noteworthy. On the one hand, a firm belief in the fundamentals - gravity exists - but on the other hand those fundamentals are not meaningful to the final decision.

But gravity does exist! Whether one likes it or not. We do not have wings. Or feathers. And the realisation of the fundamentals will impact the political calculation (though timing differences may apply).

You don’t have to invest any particular optimism or see any virtue in the principal players to make this point.
A quote from this excellent piece, neatly summarising a core impact of Brexit.

The Commission’s view, according to several sources, is that Brexit means existing distribution networks and supply chains are now defunct and will have to be replaced by other systems.


Of course, this was never written on the side of a bus. And never acknowledged by government. Everything was meant to be broadly fine apart from the inevitable teething problems.

It was, however, visible from space to balanced observers. You did not have to be a trade specialist to understand that replacing the Single Market with a third country trade arrangement meant the end of many if not all of the complex arrangements optimised for the former.

In the absence of substantive mitigations, the Brexit winners are those who subscribe to some woolly notion of ‘sovereignty’ and those who did not like freedom of movement. The losers are everyone else.

But, of course, that’s not good enough. For understandable reasons Brexit was sold as a benefit not a cost. The trading benefits of freedom would far outweigh the costs. Divergence would benefit all.

More from Finance

You May Also Like

Great article from @AsheSchow. I lived thru the 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's/early 1990's asking myself "Has eveyrbody lost their GODDAMN MINDS?!"


The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.

1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!

2) "Repressed memory" syndrome

3) Facilitated Communication [FC]

All 3 led to massive abuse.

"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.

Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.

FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.