Many of us are about to begin a new semester of online teaching. The learning curve for moving my lecture units last semester was STEEP, so I compiled some sort of hand over notes to people approaching this for the first time. I hope it's useful for someone somewhere.

Reduction in the amount of content was important. What used to be 2 x 1 hr in-person lectures/week had to be condensed down into 6 x 10 minute prerecorded videos (aka aynchronounous content) with 1 x hr live zoom session (synchronous). Even that was too much.
For the sake of yourself and your students, SLASH. Slash your content down. This doesn't mean having to lose important stuff, but keeping it short and sweet.
10 minute video chunks was just about short enough to hold attention. Have you tried watching an online lecture? It is HARD to maintain focus. The shorter the better.
Importantly, each 10 minute video had an explicit Intended Learning Objective given at the end and in the associated text, so that everyone knew what the point was (and how this might relate to assessment later).
This format seemed to be very well received by the students in terms of concision and expectations. They were exposed to a lot of different formats last semester, but this appeared to be one they favoured (maybe they are flattering me though)
For each of my videos (or at least most), I tied in some sort of open question to think about, short to exercise/task/website to attempt to seed discussion during the synchronous session rather than open Q&A silence.
I also gave guidance about maximum time to spend on each task (e.g. “spend no longer than 5 minutes thinking about/researching this”). This generally went well, but depended on the nature of the exercise.
I experimented with different ways of embedding quizzes and feedback but quickly alighted on embedding google forms to your teaching pages.
They are easy to use (point and click), provide instant feedback to students, and allow the instructutor to receive anonymous feedback.
Each 10 minute video was associated with a multiple choice question to gauge understanding, an MCQ question to gauge their confidence, and each lecture had an open form for students to ask questions anonymously or highlight topics for further discussion at the live session.
Further reading/viewing was embedded as usual, but it had to be made EXTRA clear to the students what was extra, and what was core. It is harder to distinguish in online learning format.
Through chatting with students, we found out that many were pausing the videos to transcribe and take notes. This was NOT the intention and certainly takes far too long. I have explicitly advised to NOT do that. Clear state expectations and guidance will help.
Uploading the content consistently one week before the live session helped. This isn't always possible because, you know, the chaos.
I used OBS to record videos (great audio filters and functionality) and Youtube to share, embedded in Blackboard. This helped with the accessibility and auto-captioning. https://t.co/LaNw5eqsdY
For the live (synchronous sessions on zoom) it was important to start with a general chat and some informality. I started with a musical intro and telling them about my week. Helped dispel the horrid horrid virutal default atmosphere. https://t.co/Ay5AmTSVNQ
I would then review the content and learning objective of each video in the most superficial terms, just as a reminder (no more than 2 slides for each 10 minute video). This seemed to go down quite well as a format.
This was followed by reviewing the answers and feedback to the google forms in the asynchronous material.
I used zoom breakout rooms as a forum for students to meet each other and discuss the Qs seeded in the asynchronous material. We would then return to the main group to discuss together, perhaps me calling on representatives for breakout rooms as to what they discussed.
The break out rooms generally worked well and were valued, but they need to be managed carefully (I popped in and out, as did the PhD demonstrator).
Many of students don’t turn on their cameras, even for each other. We worked on this by agreeing that the lecturer would remind everybody to turn their cameras on for each other at least in the break out rooms and generally extolling the virtue and benefit of cameras on.
Some won’t engage no matter what. Therefore bigger breakout rooms are better. After experimenting and using student feedback, we agreed on a minimum of ten people in each room. That means that at least some discussion will take place.
(you can't and shouldn't force cameras on IMO)
It was difficult to get student to ask questions in front of everybody, but when they did, a great dialogue could develop. To facilitate this, we made great use of the zoom chat function. However, this is very difficult to monitor when live presenting.
I tried to limit live sessions to 1 hour, but that is quite tight to fit in all the content and discussion. So toward the end of the semester, we developed a pattern where for the first hour of the live session we would do the essential content and chat, then...
We would stay on the line after that for extended discussions for those that wanted to be there (i.e. no longer taking register). This worked well to serve both those enthusiastic students and the ones that just wanted to get on with their day. Breaks help.
General thoughts - it was super tough, but those students that consistently had their cameras on an engaged in the chat, and showed their appreciation really made a difference and made it all just about bearable. They really made an impression.
https://t.co/3y8XxqlBEI
Good luck to everybody approaching online learning for the first time this semester, both staff and students!

More from Education

OK I am going to be tackling this as surveillance/open source intel gathering exercise, because that is my background. I blew away 3 years of my life doing site acquisition/reconnaissance for a certain industry that shall remain unnamed and believe there is significant carryover.


This is NOT going to be zillow "here is how to google school districts and find walmart" we are not concerned with this malarkey, we are homeschooling and planting victory gardens and having gigantic happy families.

With that said, for my frog and frog-adjacent bros and sisters:

CHOICE SITES:

Zillow is obvious one, but there are many good sites like Billy Land, Classic Country Land, Landwatch, etc. and many of these specialize in owner financing (more on that later.) Do NOT treat these as authoritative sources - trust plat maps and parcel viewers.

TARGET IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION:

Okay, everyone knows how to google "raw land in x state" but there are other resources out there, including state Departments of Natural Resources, foreclosure auctions, etc. Finding the land you like is the easy part. Let's do a case study.

I'm going to target using an "off-grid but not" algorithm. This is a good piece in my book - middle of nowhere but still trekkable to civilization.

Note: visible power, power/fiber pedestal, utility corridor, nearby commercial enterprise(s), and utility pole shadows visible.
It appears to be a combination of some of these factors, along with others not mentioned here. Ibn Khaldun’s analysis appears to be a good foundation to go off. [Thread]


Ibn Khaldun makes an important distinction between what he calls العُمران الحضري and العمران البدوي, which, for convenience’s sake, I’ll translate as urban civilisation and rural/Bedouin lifestyle.

He notes that the rural world is largely nomadic, and, as such, Bedouins build character traits that assist the survivalist lifestyle — e.g. the fact that they have to kill snakes that might pop up at any time during their travels helps them build courage and bravery.

The lack of stability and a proper settlement means they don’t really have the luxury of sitting down to let their minds wonder around. They thus build a preservation mindset, which manifests itself through emphasis on memorisation and transmission.

Inhabitants of urban world, on the other hand, are largely settled and established. This means they face less attacks from snakes, lions or danger of human attack from other tribes. Thus, they don’t build the courage and bravery of the Bedouins.

You May Also Like

Department List of UCAS-China PROFESSORs for ANSO, CSC and UCAS (fully or partial) Scholarship Acceptance
1) UCAS School of physical sciences Professor
https://t.co/9X8OheIvRw
2) UCAS School of mathematical sciences Professor

3) UCAS School of nuclear sciences and technology
https://t.co/nQH8JnewcJ
4) UCAS School of astronomy and space sciences
https://t.co/7Ikc6CuKHZ
5) UCAS School of engineering

6) Geotechnical Engineering Teaching and Research Office
https://t.co/jBCJW7UKlQ
7) Multi-scale Mechanics Teaching and Research Section
https://t.co/eqfQnX1LEQ
😎 Microgravity Science Teaching and Research

9) High temperature gas dynamics teaching and research section
https://t.co/tVIdKgTPl3
10) Department of Biomechanics and Medical Engineering
https://t.co/ubW4xhZY2R
11) Ocean Engineering Teaching and Research

12) Department of Dynamics and Advanced Manufacturing
https://t.co/42BKXEugGv
13) Refrigeration and Cryogenic Engineering Teaching and Research Office
https://t.co/pZdUXFTvw3
14) Power Machinery and Engineering Teaching and Research