What I Read In 2020 (A Thread) [ Let me know if you read any of these because I want someone to talk to about these books or if you want my full thoughts on anything ]

So overall I read about 28 books and 11408 pages. I had an initial goal of 24 but lockdown kicked in and I also had some big boy books too. Here's as much as I can get into a single thread:
Red Dragon by Thomas Harris: The first Hannibal Lecter book. I've always been a fan of the Hannibal franchise so I enjoyed this book. I thoroughly enjoyed Francis Dollarhyde as a tragic villain. Very cool crime thriller.
Animal Farm by George Orwell: As much as I shitpost about 1984 and George Orwell, I do enjoy what works of his I have read. Very short endearing book about a bunch of animals that get into some wacky shenanigans.
Dune by Frank Herbert: This is the first Sci-Fi book I read of the year and what sparked that book club I set up early this year. I went on a bit of a Sci-Fi binge. Dune is a very well written book, the world building is really well done and I liked the big worms a lot.
The Complete Robot by Isaac Asimov: I really enjoyed this collection of short stories. I'm a big fan of retro Sci Fi that is set in the wild future of current times. One of the foundational works in how we think of robots in pop culture today.
Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep by Philip K Dick: Beep boop more robots. Some really superb writing on what it means to be human in the context of a robot filled future. Asimov covered more of robot logic while Dick focuses on consciousness.
The Silence of the Lambs by Thomas Harris: Personally I prefered book Clarice Starling in this over book Will Graham from Red Dragon. I'd rate the two books around the same level of quality but I'm not a particular fan of Buffalo Bill.
Animal Man Book One by Grant Morrison: My second exposure to Grant Morrison with the first being Doom Patrol. I liked this book, it felt a lot more cohesive than Doom Patrol, never delving too far into silly for silly's sake. The Coyote Gospel was probably the height of this.
The Count of Monte Cristo by Dumas (Buss Translation): This wins my "The Only Good Thing France Produced This Year" award. The book is a slow boil but I never got bored with it. I'm still angry somebody in a Batman TAS Reddit thread spoiled the book for me.
The King in Yellow by RW Chambers: The first half of this short story collection is very great but the second half is unfortunately piss. It's some great weird fiction. Personal favourite was The Repairer of Reputations.
The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams: I didn't love this book as much as I thought I would. Fantastic comedic writing however reading in long sittings it can be a bit frustrating that nothing seems to have any impact or relevance to moving a plot forward
The Last Wish by Andrzej Sapkowski (Stok translation): First proper exposure to the Witcher franchise other than a failed attempt at liking the first game and the Netflix series. I enjoyed the more ethical aspects of this the show missed out on. v radical.

More from Culture

One of the authors of the Policy Exchange report on academic free speech thinks it is "ridiculous" to expect him to accurately portray an incident at Cardiff University in his study, both in the reporting and in a question put to a student sample.


Here is the incident Kaufmann incorporated into his study, as told by a Cardiff professor who was there. As you can see, the incident involved the university intervening to *uphold* free speech principles:


Here is the first mention of the Greer at Cardiff incident in Kaufmann's report. It refers to the "concrete case" of the "no-platforming of Germaine Greer". Any reasonable reader would assume that refers to an incident of no-platforming instead of its opposite.


Here is the next mention of Greer in the report. The text asks whether the University "should have overruled protestors" and "stepped in...and guaranteed Greer the right to speak". Again the strong implication is that this did not happen and Greer was "no platformed".


The authors could easily have added a footnote at this point explaining what actually happened in Cardiff. They did not.
A thread of very good, wonderful, truly Super Bowls.

Translucent agate bowl with ornamental grooves and coffee-and-cream marbling. Found near Qift in southern Egypt. 300 - 1,000 BC. 📷 Getty Museum https://t.co/W1HfQZIG2V


Technicolor dreambowl, found in a grave near Zadar on Croatia's Dalmatian Coast. Made by melding and winding thin bars of glass, each adulterated with different minerals to get different colors. 1st century AD. 📷 Zadar Museum of Ancient Glass
https://t.co/H9VfNrXKQK


100,000-year-old abalone shells used to mix red ocher, marrow, charcoal, and water into a colorful paste. Possibly the oldest artist's palettes ever discovered. Blombos Cave, South Africa. 📷https://t.co/0fMeYlOsXG


Reed basket bowl with shell and feather ornaments. Possibly from the Southern Pomo or Lake Miwok cultures. Found in Santa Barbara, CA, circa 1770. 📷 British Museum https://t.co/F4Ix0mXAu6


Wooden bowl with concentric circles and rounded rim, most likely made of umbrella thorn acacia (Vachellia/Acacia tortilis). Qumran. 1st Century BCE. 📷 https://t.co/XZCw67Ho03

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.