Every stock that goes up 5 times or more follows a fixed pattern .

Here's a thread ๐Ÿท

This will help us identify such stocks with a systematic and simple investing approach.

I use the following concepts to identify stocks which can move 5 times
-Relative Strength
-Stage Analysis
-Volume Analysis

1/n
I believe that every stock must outperform Nifty before it becomes a multibagger. I use relative strength to identify stocks that are outperforming Nifty.

2/n
I then divides stocks in to four phases. I pick stocks that are in stage 2 or uptrend phase. I use moving average to identify stocks that are entering stage 2 advance.

3/n
Finally, I look at price and volume action to confirm entries and exits from the stock.

I have given several examples of stocks like Yes Bank, IEX,HSCL, Elecon Engineering, JSW Energy etc.

4/n
https://t.co/jhUSaDC87i

Watch this complete Video for More understanding

5/n
I insist that investors must not try to find bottoms or tops with this strategyโ€ฆrather they must focus on riding the trend.

6/n
I am certain this episode will provide you an additional edge in the markets while picking right stocks that can go up 5 times or even higher.

7/n
Read this Complete Thread !
https://t.co/nLi5MOVtVL

Follow @JayneshKasliwal for more such insights

End

More from JayneshKasliwal

๐Ÿฑ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ธ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜:
๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐Ÿฎ

๐Ÿงต Thread ๐Ÿงต
Retweet And I will Link a 36 Page PDF

๐Ÿญ. ๐—”๐—ฑ๐—ฑ ๐—™๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜
๐Ÿ”ธ Link:
https://t.co/zG165Xa3JB
๐Ÿ”ธ Click on the above link -> Add to Favourites -> Add on Chart from favourites and start using it !
2/20

You can add financials from many fundamental criteria's like
๐Ÿ”ธ Cashflows
๐Ÿ”ธ Income Statements
๐Ÿ”ธ Balance sheets
๐Ÿ”ธ PE,PB ratios
๐Ÿ”ธ Marketcapitlization
๐Ÿ”ธ Statistics
3/20


How to change Settings:
๐Ÿ”ธ There are 8 columns you can basically select any financial you want
๐Ÿ”ธ You can select quarterly or Yearly values and can also write
๐Ÿ”ธ The names of the financiaLS Example : EPS Qtr3
๐Ÿ”ธ You can Change colours , font size
4/20


๐Ÿฎ. ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€
You cannot track each and every indicator like ( ๐— ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—”๐˜ƒ๐—ด๐˜€ , ๐—ฅ๐—ฆ๐—œ , ๐— ๐—”๐—–๐—— ) etc , you can use plot this custom strategy to understand whether the trend is positive or negative of those indicators
5/20

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thingโ€”physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?