I don't know about crypto but I invested because it's was rising
- Retail Investor
More from Investment Books
40 Investing Books Recommendations from 20 Legendary Investors
Including Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Joel Greenblatt, Mohnish Pabrai, Guy Spier, Li Lu.......
Worth More than $100 Billion!
1. Warren Buffett
The Most Important Thing - https://t.co/9noBa9TIYk
The Outsider -
2. Charlie Munger
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion - https://t.co/UnBFJ90J9o
The Warren Buffett Portfolio -
3. Mohnish Pabrai
100 Baggers - https://t.co/CrIt3kJlaF
A Gift to My Children: A Father’s Lessons for Life and Investing -
4. Chris Mayer
The Little Book That Beats the Market. - https://t.co/7NEKHgNCSD
100 to 1 in the Stock Market by Thomas Phelps -
Including Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Joel Greenblatt, Mohnish Pabrai, Guy Spier, Li Lu.......
Worth More than $100 Billion!
1. Warren Buffett
The Most Important Thing - https://t.co/9noBa9TIYk
The Outsider -
2. Charlie Munger
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion - https://t.co/UnBFJ90J9o
The Warren Buffett Portfolio -
3. Mohnish Pabrai
100 Baggers - https://t.co/CrIt3kJlaF
A Gift to My Children: A Father’s Lessons for Life and Investing -
4. Chris Mayer
The Little Book That Beats the Market. - https://t.co/7NEKHgNCSD
100 to 1 in the Stock Market by Thomas Phelps -
More from Wise investing
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?