But this requires your latency to be the least.
Working on some execution optimisation related backtesting. I have so far been executing with market orders only. Going towards higher lot sizes, I'd like to optimise for minimal slippage.
First off, on NSE, if you place a market order, you get filled at the best bid/ask right?
But this requires your latency to be the least.
I looked at tick historical data, and there are more than 18-20 ticks in a second (auction and quote combined).
Even if you keep 10 ticks per second, your best bid/ask can shift from the time you place to the time exchange receives the order.
What you need is liquidity.
More from Shravan Venkataraman ๐ฅ๐๐ฐ
Here's the roundup of 17 of the best and the most useful threads, tweets, and resources I found last week. ๐งต
1/ How to find spreadsheets on any topic in the
How to find spreadsheets on any topic in the world:
— Blake Emal (@heyblake) February 13, 2022
1. Go to Google
2. Search site:docs(dot)Google(dot)com/spreadsheets \u201cYOUR TOPIC\u201d
3. Search, scroll, succeed pic.twitter.com/VJsYQKyi0J
2/ A thread by @wes_kao on making your customers hungry and excited to buy from
How to get customers excited, hungry to buy, and ready to say yes:
— Wes Kao \U0001f3db (@wes_kao) February 13, 2022
3/ Life brings you a lot of afflictions. But if you look around, there's a lot of beauty around you. Most often, drowning in the afflictions, we can't recognise or appreciate the beauty.
@wdmorrisjr wrote a damn good thread on finding beauty around us.
You\u2019re not looking for more success, stuff, or sex.
— David Morris (@wdmorrisjr) February 13, 2022
You\u2019re searching for beauty.
Here\u2019s how to find it: \U0001f9f5
4/ This one is for all the job goers and job seekers.
@SahilBloom who recently hit 500k followers and has several accomplishments to his belt (career wise) wrote this thread on standing out in a hiring
10 ways to stand out in a hiring process (that don\u2019t involve your resume):
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) February 13, 2022
That's called as "hot-hand fallacy" bias.
I ran a poll recently to outline two classic biases we have as humans.
Thread below ๐๐
Let's say you see a cricketer hit four 6's in a row.
— Shravan Venkataraman \U0001f525\U0001f680\U0001f4b0 (@theBuoyantMan) December 30, 2020
If you have to bet on the next ball's outcome, what would you bet on?
1/ *Hot-Hand Fallacy* first had its origin in the game of basketball.
If a player shoots few baskets in a row, people generally predict that the next shot will also be a basket.
This is ignoring the fact that each shot is independent of the ones that came prior.
2/ In this poll, 41.1% people voted that the batsman who hit 4 sixes in a row, will hit a sixer in the 5th ball also.
This is classic hot-hand fallacy.
Each ball's outcome is independent.
The probability is not 50% FYI (number of outcomes is not 2).
These 148 people who voted that the next ball will also be a sixer, did so because they believe that the batsman is on a hot streak, and that his streak would continue.
This is an emotional bias and is usually attached to human performance related events only.
3/ 45.3% (162) people voted that the 5th ball would be a dot ball, meaning the batsman wouldn't score anything.
These people displayed the classic "negative-recency" bias, which is also called the "Gambler's Fallacy".
More from Trading
Yesterday was brutal for some people...
Losing life-changing money sucks, losing any money sucks...you can chase the market or you can change your strategy.
2/ The original thread is gone but you can read it here.
https://t.co/cLLNs75rB0
tl;dr
- Traded $32k to $1.2m
- Thought I was a genius
- Made poor investments
- Didn't conserve capital
- Peaked at 150 BTC
- Lost nearly all of it
2 weeks from losing my house + no income. Oops.
3/ I am going to assume you are in it for the money rather than the tech. Yeah, you might Tweet about the amazing blockchaining of cross-border payments and oracles yadda yadda...really, you are in it to make money.
If you are really in it for the tech, go and build something.
4/ Okay, so if you want to make money, trading is super hard, you are trading against:
- Better traders than you
- People who can move markets
- Unknown information
And if you are trading with leverage you might blow up your account with the volatility.
5/ If you are not trading, you are investing. Okay, so what are you investing in?
I made the decision that the crypto with the best opportunity of existing in 10 years is #Bitcoin:
- Solves a genuine problem
- The right tech
- A proven track record
Complete Backtest and Indicator link
๐งต A Thread ๐งต
๐ฆ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฝ:
๐ธ Monthly Option Buying
๐ธ 50 ema on 3 min timeframe
๐ธ Supertrend 10 , 3
๐ธ Chart : Banknifty , Nifty Futures as we backtested on futures
๐ธ Entry 9:20 to 3:00
๐ธ Max 3 Entries per day
๐ธ Premium nearest to 200 Rs only
[2/18]
Why Monthly Option buying ?
๐ธ Less theta decay compared to weekly options
๐ธ Less Volatility
๐ธ Supertrend and MA Settings
[3/18]
๐ธ Indicator Link
๐ธ Click on the below ๐ญ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฌ -> ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐๐ข๐ท๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐ฆ๐ด -> ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ณ๐ต from favourites and start using it !
๐ธ https://t.co/zVXavqLBto
[4/18]
๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ :
๐ธ Max 6 Trades per day ( Both CE and PE buy)
๐ธ Timings 9:20 am to 3:00 pm
๐ธ Supertrend : 10,3
๐ธ Moving Average 50 ema
[5/18]
You May Also Like
To me, the most important aspect of the 2018 midterms wasn't even about partisan control, but about democracy and voting rights. That's the real battle.
2/The good news: It's now an issue that everyone's talking about, and that everyone cares about.
3/More good news: Florida's proposition to give felons voting rights won. But it didn't just win - it won with substantial support from Republican voters.
That suggests there is still SOME grassroots support for democracy that transcends
4/Yet more good news: Michigan made it easier to vote. Again, by plebiscite, showing broad support for voting rights as an
5/OK, now the bad news.
We seem to have accepted electoral dysfunction in Florida as a permanent thing. The 2000 election has never really
Bad ballot design led to a lot of undervotes for Bill Nelson in Broward Co., possibly even enough to cost him his Senate seat. They do appear to be real undervotes, though, instead of tabulation errors. He doesn't really seem to have a path to victory. https://t.co/utUhY2KTaR
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 16, 2018