you can place two type of stoploss orders one is SL-Market & SL-limit
stoploss & slippages : a thread to understand how to avoid big slippage when you get stopped out #Qunat #AlgoTradeing #Nifty #stoploss (p.s. this is just an effort to educate & example is for illustration only.) hope this helps.
you can place two type of stoploss orders one is SL-Market & SL-limit
ex. 1) 9:20 -> SL order trigger at 100 qty 500
2) 9:45 -> SL order with trigger at 100 qty 500
3) 11:30 -> SL order with trigger at 100.5 qty 500
for these ppl now panic kicks in and they convert Sl-limit to market and this 2nd push takes prices even lower
1. keeping trigger at higher level avoid round prices like 100, 110, so if your swing low if at 102 most ppl keep SL trriger at 101 or 99 to be on safe side ..
so instead for waiting for confirmation 1st place your SL order on signal (you need to calculate your RR on this price)
now on confirmation place your buy order.
Trading in large quantities, want to reduce slippages?
— Jitendra Jain (@jitendrajain) June 10, 2021
A small document on how to reduce slippages.
Will keep adding points.
Made with help from @TraderLogical
Also inputs by @JigneshTrade ,@pavankulkarni & @QuantKarnage https://t.co/rAVJDnznpL
Any Inputs?
Do Retweet
More from Stockslearnings
4 factors to measure the performance of a trading system:
1 - Accuracy
There is no such thing as 90% Accuracy without compromising on other factors (like profit factor, etc)
Fact - A good trading system will have only 35-60% accuracy without compromising other factors.
(1/n)
2 - Profit Factor (PF)
It is similar to risk-reward. It is derived using the below formula:
Profit Factor = Total Profit by winning trades / Total loss by losing trades
Fact - A trading system above 1.2 PF is good if it scores well with other factors.
(2/n)
3 - Maximum Drawdown
The maximum drawdown also plays a vital role psychologically while picking a trading system.
Fact - Maximum Drawdown in any trading system should not exceed 20%. I suggest picking only the techniques which have less than 10% maximum drawdown.
(3/n)
4 - Maximum Consecutive Losers
We all feel bad even if we lose only Rs.1,000 in a trade. Because it is not only about the money, it is emotionally difficult to accept the failure.
Fact - A good trading system will have less than 15 consecutive losing trades.
(4/n)
TRADE LIKE CRAZY
10 Profitable Intraday Trading Systems, which are backtested against 10-years of Banknifty Historical Data!
(n/n)
https://t.co/BuUie17Ish
1 - Accuracy
There is no such thing as 90% Accuracy without compromising on other factors (like profit factor, etc)
Fact - A good trading system will have only 35-60% accuracy without compromising other factors.
(1/n)
2 - Profit Factor (PF)
It is similar to risk-reward. It is derived using the below formula:
Profit Factor = Total Profit by winning trades / Total loss by losing trades
Fact - A trading system above 1.2 PF is good if it scores well with other factors.
(2/n)
3 - Maximum Drawdown
The maximum drawdown also plays a vital role psychologically while picking a trading system.
Fact - Maximum Drawdown in any trading system should not exceed 20%. I suggest picking only the techniques which have less than 10% maximum drawdown.
(3/n)
4 - Maximum Consecutive Losers
We all feel bad even if we lose only Rs.1,000 in a trade. Because it is not only about the money, it is emotionally difficult to accept the failure.
Fact - A good trading system will have less than 15 consecutive losing trades.
(4/n)
TRADE LIKE CRAZY
10 Profitable Intraday Trading Systems, which are backtested against 10-years of Banknifty Historical Data!
(n/n)
https://t.co/BuUie17Ish
1/n
Dear @chartmojo
Out of curiosity, just gone through your timeline and prepared a data of your shared tweets in OCT'2020;
You will not believe the following numbers:
Charts shared = 29 (2 excluded due to splits)
Period = 8-oct to 30-oct'20
..
2/n
If min.10k invested on your each design, then
Amount invested in Oct'20 = 2.91 lacs
Present investment value = 4.72 lacs
Maximum drawdown = 9%
ROI = 62% in 200 days
Annualized ROI = 147%
**You ROCK brother**
...
I've prepared a sheet for all your Oct'20 tweets; It was so much learning on the charts as well as on the data-part; Please keep on the good work.
Sheet link:
https://t.co/8BJtMsOkBD
With regards,
Deepak
Dear @chartmojo
Out of curiosity, just gone through your timeline and prepared a data of your shared tweets in OCT'2020;
You will not believe the following numbers:
Charts shared = 29 (2 excluded due to splits)
Period = 8-oct to 30-oct'20
..
2/n
If min.10k invested on your each design, then
Amount invested in Oct'20 = 2.91 lacs
Present investment value = 4.72 lacs
Maximum drawdown = 9%
ROI = 62% in 200 days
Annualized ROI = 147%
**You ROCK brother**
...
I've prepared a sheet for all your Oct'20 tweets; It was so much learning on the charts as well as on the data-part; Please keep on the good work.
Sheet link:
https://t.co/8BJtMsOkBD
With regards,
Deepak
You May Also Like
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?