I have explained the importance of meeasuring momentum of the trend.
U can guage the strength in the trend once u know how to measure the direction.
This trend strength is infact signals the trend continuity or the potetnial for sustanining the trend.
Thats great assurace to hav https://t.co/HanLvlXkjQ

Before making ur trade entry or even before making a bias of trend as either bullish or bearish, do u use any objective measures to define the trend based on price, volume and momentum?
— Aneesh Philomina Antony (@ProdigalTrader) May 15, 2021
Price will always go back and forth move no matter how strong the trend is.
1/4 pic.twitter.com/qqizh2JO3J
More from Aneesh Philomina Antony
its meant to get all the useful infos in one place
pls chk the comments below
philosophy trap in
Often u would find a struggling person talks philosophy
— Aneesh Philomina Antony (ProdigalTrader) (@ProdigalTrader) October 19, 2020
Bcz, that's easy
Kind of accepting what's happening as inevitable
It's fate & u r bound to take it
But very few guys,
refuse philosophy
decide to fight
Make a plan
start from scratch
&
persist with hard work
They win
1/4 https://t.co/YUkL143dzz
if demand is enough, it should go up fast
if not, a small increase in supply can trigger substantial fall
#coforge https://t.co/2yJRCUFMIO

failing to find momentum
— Aneesh Philomina Antony (ProdigalTrader) (@ProdigalTrader) April 6, 2022
too slow for my liking
4408 - 4508 (0.7R)
cutting it off#coforge https://t.co/NtN2ECRSA4 pic.twitter.com/sz1kH8LPI7
More from Stockslearnings
Friends,
— Pankaj DP (@voPAtrader) May 8, 2021
I am planning to write Stock mkt related thread (/writeup) on..
WHY STUFF WORK?
E.g. Why prior Support acts as Resistance?
If u have such questions related to Data/ TA, DM me. If possible, I shall incorporate reasoning for that as well.....#learning #stocks
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".