Mahadev himself narrated the story of Ekadash Mukhi Hanuman ji to Maa Parvati. Once a great monster named Kalkarmukh performed the severe penance of Brahma ji.
Pleased with the austerity of the demon, Brahma ji gave him a boon that the person who will have eleven Heads like you and who was born on the day of your birth, only he/she will be able to kill you. No one else will kill you.
After getting a boon from Brahma ji, Kalkarmukh created a ruckus in all three lok. He invaded Swarg and snatched all the rights of the Devtas and became himself the king of Swarg.
All Devtagan came to Shri Rama and asked him for help. Hearing the agony of the Devtagan, Shri Ram called his supreme devotee Hanuman ji and said, "Pawan Putra, Sankatmochan".
You are the only one who can protect this world. Hanuman ji was born on Chaitra Purnima and Chaitra Purnima was also the birth date of Kalkarmukh.
Hanuman ji bowed down to Shree Rama and then took a very fierce form in which he had eleven heads.This form of Hanuman ji is called Ekadash Mukhi and 11 Mukhi. Hanuman ji challenged Kalkarmukh to battle. Kalkarmukh arrived with his army to fight with Hanuman ji.
Ekadash Hanuman ji killed the kalkarmukh's army in a moment. After that Hanuman ji grabbed the Kalkarmukh's neck and took him to the sky. In this way Hanuman ji killed Kalkarmukh.
All Devtagan bowed down to Hanuman ji and said that Hanuman ji whoever worships your Ekadash sawroop, all his wishes will be fulfilled and he/she should be protected from all directions.
📸: Respected Owner
Please like, retweet and follow @ranvijayT90 for more Facts, Unsolved Mysteries and Unexplored Places. 🙏
Cc: @LostTemple7 @DograTishaa @mamatarsingh @pujari_anup @artisdiary @Sumita327 @varshaparmar6 @desi_thug1 @DivineElement @SanatanOnly @InfoVedic @DeepaShreeAB @harshasherni @rightwingchora @TheAlpraptors @Official_Sherni @Kautilya_tilak

More from Ranvijay Singh🇮🇳

You May Also Like

THREAD: 12 Things Everyone Should Know About IQ

1. IQ is one of the most heritable psychological traits – that is, individual differences in IQ are strongly associated with individual differences in genes (at least in fairly typical modern environments). https://t.co/3XxzW9bxLE


2. The heritability of IQ *increases* from childhood to adulthood. Meanwhile, the effect of the shared environment largely fades away. In other words, when it comes to IQ, nature becomes more important as we get older, nurture less.
https://t.co/UqtS1lpw3n


3. IQ scores have been increasing for the last century or so, a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. https://t.co/sCZvCst3hw (N ≈ 4 million)

(Note that the Flynn effect shows that IQ isn't 100% genetic; it doesn't show that it's 100% environmental.)


4. IQ predicts many important real world outcomes.

For example, though far from perfect, IQ is the single-best predictor of job performance we have – much better than Emotional Intelligence, the Big Five, Grit, etc. https://t.co/rKUgKDAAVx https://t.co/DWbVI8QSU3


5. Higher IQ is associated with a lower risk of death from most causes, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, most forms of cancer, homicide, suicide, and accident. https://t.co/PJjGNyeQRA (N = 728,160)
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?