More from Colibri Trader
More from Stockslearnings
Thread's on:
• How to find targets and exit criteria?
• Shanon's Demon (Investing)
• Tradingview scanner- Intraday/BTST
• 90-degree angle inflection point for profit-booking
• Importance of Leverage
Other cool tweets as well.
🧵Shannon's Demon - an investing "thought exercise"
This account writes the best threads, if you like the threads I make, you will surely love this account. Must
1/
— 10-K Diver (@10kdiver) October 23, 2021
Get a cup of coffee.
In this thread, I'll walk you through Shannon's Demon.
This is an investing "thought exercise" -- posed by the great scientist Claude Shannon.
Solving this exercise can teach us a lot about favorable vs unfavorable long-term bets, position sizing, etc.
🧵Finding expected targets and exit criteria to look for to exit the
How to find out the expected targets and what should be the exit criteria when you enter a trade - \U0001f9f5
— Sheetal Rijhwani (@RijhwaniSheetal) October 25, 2021
Possible ways to find out the target:
Check if any patterns forming - it gets quite easy to figure out the targets that way. (1/15)
🧵Trading View Scanner process to trade in momentum stocks.
Trading view scanner process -
— Vikrant (@Trading0secrets) October 23, 2021
1 - open trading view in your browser and select stock scanner in left corner down side .
2 - touch the percentage% gain change ( and u can see higest gainer of today) https://t.co/GGWSZXYMth
🧵90-degree angle inflection point for
The 90 degree angle inflection point in a stock is a signal to book profit
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) October 24, 2021
Lets understand with a recent example of a stock #IRCTC \U0001f683\U0001f68b
Time for a thread\U0001f9f5
1 - Accuracy
There is no such thing as 90% Accuracy without compromising on other factors (like profit factor, etc)
Fact - A good trading system will have only 35-60% accuracy without compromising other factors.
(1/n)
2 - Profit Factor (PF)
It is similar to risk-reward. It is derived using the below formula:
Profit Factor = Total Profit by winning trades / Total loss by losing trades
Fact - A trading system above 1.2 PF is good if it scores well with other factors.
(2/n)
3 - Maximum Drawdown
The maximum drawdown also plays a vital role psychologically while picking a trading system.
Fact - Maximum Drawdown in any trading system should not exceed 20%. I suggest picking only the techniques which have less than 10% maximum drawdown.
(3/n)
4 - Maximum Consecutive Losers
We all feel bad even if we lose only Rs.1,000 in a trade. Because it is not only about the money, it is emotionally difficult to accept the failure.
Fact - A good trading system will have less than 15 consecutive losing trades.
(4/n)
TRADE LIKE CRAZY
10 Profitable Intraday Trading Systems, which are backtested against 10-years of Banknifty Historical Data!
(n/n)
https://t.co/BuUie17Ish
You May Also Like
Viruses and other pathogens are often studied as stand-alone entities, despite that, in nature, they mostly live in multispecies associations called biofilms—both externally and within the host.
https://t.co/FBfXhUrH5d
Microorganisms in biofilms are enclosed by an extracellular matrix that confers protection and improves survival. Previous studies have shown that viruses can secondarily colonize preexisting biofilms, and viral biofilms have also been described.
...we raise the perspective that CoVs can persistently infect bats due to their association with biofilm structures. This phenomenon potentially provides an optimal environment for nonpathogenic & well-adapted viruses to interact with the host, as well as for viral recombination.
Biofilms can also enhance virion viability in extracellular environments, such as on fomites and in aquatic sediments, allowing viral persistence and dissemination.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.