BC SOFTWARE
Saved by @Alex1Powell

One of the big promises of software is composability. You can build rich, powerful experiences out of basic building blocks.

APIs add new things to the toolbox. For example: Treasury, which lets an app/platform store, move, and track a business’

 I've been a small business owner and can talk at length about SMB banking, and will later, but let's put on the software developer hat right now.

Lots of software talks about money, keeps records about money, does calculations about money, but can't *touch* money.
This is extremely frustrating when you're building SaaS apps for businesses, because you have total control over your UX right until your app needs to touch money... at which point all data about it lives in a silo you can't access.

So you generally push work to the operator.
For example, suppose you’re writing a business-in-a-box system for electricians, including an invoicing feature.

You need to be able to read bank transactions to reconcile. You probably can't. The owner can. So you ask the owner to do mind-numbing work a computer does better.
It sure would be great if your business customers had bank accounts you could actually introspect and operate on their behalves! You could just get the list of incoming payments and match against the invoices.

There is some software to write but it is not rocket science.
Stripe Billing goes to some crazy lengths to do this (virtual bank accounts, bespoke contracts with banking partners, etc); most SaaS companies offering invoicing as a feature probably shouldn't. You would want to spend your developer time elsewhere.
Stripe Treasury, now in limited beta, will allow software companies to provision money management accounts for their users, and then operate on those accounts like they expect to operate on data, servers, Stripe charges, or anything else you have an API for.
What’s the difference between a money management account and e.g. a standard banking checking account? As a user, not that much. You get a card to buy things with and get cash, and the ability to send ACH payments, bill payments, and the like.
The distinction is mostly implementation-layer concerns in banking-land.
It's difficult to envision what you can create given powerful primitives. Almost everything you see on a screen sits on top of NAND gates; looking at a NAND gate doesn't show you Twitter.

But let me speculate a bit:
B2B SaaS which deals with money, which is most of it, just got a whole lot more interesting, because it can directly operate on the money.
Take Shopify, for example. Shopify gives users an online storefront, and naturally needs to keep track of the total in the virtual register.
But with Stripe Treasury API, Shopify launched Shopify Balance, which lets them build a much better register. They always know the real total inside of it, not just what "should" be there.

They can automate its operations.

https://t.co/fMOqHh2Tlv
And because of Stripe's global payments and treasury network, we didn't just make these capabilities *accessible* to developers.

We made it *better* for your users than many business bank accounts.
What does every small business care about? Cash flow. What's a top 10 customer support request for every business which sees funds flows, like Shopify?

"When do I get my money?"

Can you imagine needing to email Google to ask when that email that you know was sent will arrive?
If the money just arrived faster, there would be less angst for users whether it would arrive at all. Less tickets opened. Less questions you can’t usefully answer.

Why is money *so slow* and *so opaque*?
*sigh* That is a complicated topic, but at the end of the day, you're generally rate limited by the slowest rail between where the money comes in and where it goes out.

In the U.S., you’ll often be blocked on the ACH network. Fast compared to stagecoach; slow compared to email.
But with Stripe Treasury, money doesn't have to lag its way through the ACH network between a customer paying it and a business receiving it.

Stripe has an arrangement with the banks that ultimately hold the business users’ funds.
So when your software says "OK, disburse the money they've earned from the platform", it's in their account (and spendable!) on the same day.

(We are working on making that even faster by default. It’s not called HTTP 200 Check Back In An Hour.)
SaaS platforms are one use case for Stripe Treasury, but you can envision another one: novel fintechs, with different UXes, brands, and target business users, built on a core set of primitives.

Putting together fintech products is historically a pain in the keister.
Every significant feature you add requires an integration with a banking partner, often a *new* banking partner, often *several* banking partners.
That integration requires lengthy negotiations, bespoke legal work, approvals, etc just to unblock your engineering team.

Then your engineering team receives the spec, and the *real* fun begins.
We did away with most of that for Stripe Treasury, just like we did for Payments before it.

No negotiation required. No bespoke legal work. More of the necessary levels of complexity in touching money businesses depend on; less of the overhead.
And, of course, the care and attention to the developer experience that you'd expect from us.
A day may come when Stripe forgets what is was like to build software, when we ship a 400 page PDF file as the sole documentation for an API, but it is not this day.
So if you want to build a vertical fintech targeting carpenters? Offering payments in and out, a place to hold insured funds, and a card to spend them with?

You can build all of that on Stripe APIs now.
And if your users need financing? Snap in Stripe Capital for Platforms and we can facilitate access to loans based on their predicted future revenue through your platform. https://t.co/Ye28gyMPRh (This also came out this week.)
And now, back to being an erstwhile small businessman who has had bank accounts for many years.

AAAAAAAARGH.
Small business banking has a poor UX, because of structural issues.

It is managed at most banks as an offshoot of personal banking, because the userbase is basically the same people who show up at the branch.

But the needs are quite different.
Banks specialize in one-size-fits-most products. The basic checking account you have is designed to cover more than 60% of the total population. It functions effectively the same for almost all of its users.
This kinda makes sense for individuals. Financial circumstances differ, but tend to rhyme: money in from a job or pension; money out to housing, utilities, debit card payments; some cash management.

(Narrator: This is not, in fact, an adequate spec for a checking account.)
But the needs of businesses are _wildly different_ from each other!
A small scale landlord cares quite a bit about mortgages and timely rent collection (and super-timely notice of non-payment), but rather little about payroll or expenses for consumables, and probably almost nothing for cash management.
A pizzeria, on the other hand, thinks it is inconceivable to make almost all the money on one day a month, spends most of revenue on payroll and consumables, and cares quite a bit about cash management.
These businesses deserve fundamentally different application-layer experiences from their banking. And they don't get them, because banks are incapable of offering hundreds of vertical software solutions.
(Just making the one-size-fits-most personal banking and mobile apps *actually good* is hard enough! It seems like we’re just getting there in the last 5 years!)
Who does offer hundreds of vertically-specialized application experiences? The software industry. Shopify specializes in e-commerce merchants and understands them, thoroughly. They don't sell to dentists.
Dentists have thriving ecosystems of firms that live and breathe every aspect of their practices.

So do graveyards. And hotels. And landlords. And spas. And tutors. And yoga teachers. And...
Why is software so varied but banking so… not? One reason is that businesses pay an awful lot for software, but pay relatively little for banking. Banking is a scale game.

Not enough dentists pay not enough dollars for banks to put software teams against dental practice UX.
But because a software company can address dentists by the nation, not by the square-mile-around-a-branch, and because they charge more, a software company serving dentists can reliably generate enough money to pay an engineering team.
Here Stripe acts as an aggregator: we can gather up *many* businesses attached to *many* software companies. These product teams understand their customers’ businesses *thoroughly*.

We can then take that package to leading banks. That reach is *very interesting* to them.
That is why Goldman Sachs, Citi, Barclays, and Evolve Bank and Trust partner with us.

A pizzeria can't walk into Goldman Sachs and walk out with a bank account.

A software company serving pizzerias could if they had, uh, a lot of dough.
But a material chunk of the software industry, that's a different story altogether.

And so our partner banks have made great products available, at pricing and terms that small businesses just don't usually get in direct banking relationships.
Take account maintenance fees. Please.

I know exactly how many times I paid the $14 account maintenance fee for my software businesses, ten years later. That’s how much I hated them.
I had gone below $X,000 in deposits (I was bootstrapped! Rent was due!) and hadn’t managed to spend at least $250 on the debit card because, whoops, mis-timed a billing cycle by two days.
(Being a bit older and wiser I probably should have just considered that $14 a cost-of-doing-business and spent my time on sales, not timing debit card transactions, but my emotional state at the time was closer to “Gah I feel like a chump.”)
We have agreed, with our partners, on a pricing structure where a SaaS company or fintech doesn't need to charge an account maintenance fee.
(As the software company, you *could*, because you control your pricing, but presumably you will make better choices, and your users will not say, ten years later, “I trusted you, and you made me feel like a chump. Six times.”)
How is this possible, and why didn't the banking system do it years ago?

One way to think of it is that banks have huge expenses to attract SMB deposits, including marketing campaigns and branch networks, and those drive the pricing of SMB banking.
The cost of *servicing* SMB accounts has gone down over the years, now that account statements are not calculated by highly-trained artisans, but the cost of *acquiring* them is increasing over time.

Nationwide advertising, branches, and sales reps aren’t as cheap as cron jobs.
Since the software industry is doing their own customer acquisition, and there is sharply less need for the branch network (itself more a sales tool than a servicing tool), some banks are happy to pass the savings back to Main Street.
There's obviously a lot more detail here (hosted onboarding flows, KYC and AML compliance workflows built for you, all accounts have deposit insurance, etc), but I have to end this tweetstorm somewhere.

I'm very excited to see what software people do with the Stripe Treasury.
Anticipating a FAQ: "Is this the product you were referring to here?"

No. This was my number two. You're welcome to your guess at the number one. (Though, who knows, I heard of a new project last week and might steal the zeroth spot for it.)

https://t.co/osjjx8gNM0

More from Patrick McKenzie

Patrick McKenzie
Patrick McKenzie
@patio11
So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.


The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.

This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.

The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."

This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.
CRYPTO
Patrick McKenzie
Patrick McKenzie
@patio11
If an employer is willing to be abusive to you prior to hiring you, when you have maximum leverage and they are maximally incentivized to play nice, I think that gives you *extremely actionable* signal as to how they'll treat you when you're working there and dependent on them.

For candidates: evaluate prospective employers accordingly.

For startups employing e.g. engineers: given that your candidates should evaluate you accordingly, be *extra special* careful to operate like professionals with regards to e.g. interviewing, offers, and negotiation.

"Can you be more explicit about 'abusive' here?"

Not without violating a confidence, but as someone who has been on hiring side of table and is a capitalist, there are *clearly* things you could do which would be "sharp operating, but we're all sharp operators" in some contexts.

Hiring employees is often not one of those contexts. The nature of the relationship, the asymmetry in power, and the social contract strongly counsel you to be a lot better there than you are minimally required by law / contract.

A thing which aesthetically frustrates me is that a lot of the things I've heard companies do here serve *no legitimate business purpose.* In some cases it's getting tens of dollars of advantage. TENS! On an engineering candidate!
ALL
Advertisement
Patrick McKenzie
Patrick McKenzie
@patio11
This lunch is 500 yen ($4.80) at Sukiya, a Japanese fast food restaurant which belongs to a category with about three big competitors.

I love the aesthetics of this category and they’re under remarked upon.


I think people underestimate QSRs in terms of social utility, but Sukiya et al describe themselves as mission-oriented enterprises. I believe this is largely sincere, and goes back to the 60s and 70s, when the clientele was primarily manual laborers who had migrated to work.

Japan was not a rich nation at the time, and day laborers in particular were both unlikely to be able to cook for themselves and unlikely to have much of a food budget, and so the chains sprung up offering an honest-to-goodness cooked meal delivered in under a minute for cheap.

This heritage continued over the years, even after Japan became a much more wealthy nation, and these chains function as social support and dignity for folks in diminished circumstances.

They also are a wee bit of a cartel, and I appreciate the aesthetics of the cartel:

Back when I was first in Japan, in the mid 2000s, there was an increase in the price of beef.

And the heads of the three chains got together, and decided that the price of the basic beef bowl needed to increase, but given the economic circumstances how could they hold the line.
FOOD
Patrick McKenzie
Patrick McKenzie
@patio11
Torn between "I think losing $100 million when someone beats you at security research is pretty much exactly what you signed up for doing yield farming" and "Maaaaaaaybe not the future of finance you were expecting, huh."

How to put this in regular finance terms...

Suppose hypothetically you have an account at a brokerage with some valuable asset in it. You take a margin loan against that asset to fund your normal spending, or pay a tax bill, or maybe buy something at another brokerage.

For reasons known only to the brokerage, they don't denominate your loan in dollars. They denominate it in shares of a money market fund, which are worth $1 +/- epsilon and basically never deviate from that.

And you think "Hmm, I have a large equity cushion against this loan."

One day, a computer system at the brokerage reports, sorta-kinda erroneously, that the value of the money market fund is actually $1.30 per share. The equity cushion is gone. Your valuable asset is sold, at timing you didn't choose, at wrong price, to pay an inflated phantom debt

And your recourse is... probably tweeting at patio11 saying he finds too much joy in this.

Which I don't; I just feel like this is why you don't trust a CPU built out of redstone to build reliable financial infrastructure on top of.
TECH
Patrick McKenzie
Patrick McKenzie
@patio11
A thing which I unironically and enthusiastically believe which is unpopular among smart people of my acquaintance: financial engineering has in the recent past and present contributed substantially to human welfare. We should hope to see more of it.

Maybe more geeks need to meet someone who says “My job is teleporting value across time and space.”

Financial engineering is sort of a squishy term. I don’t primarily mean payments infrastructure or financial rails, although both of those involve substantial engineering.

I mean more “We took a thing and performed some alchemy, and now have a new thing.”

Except instead of alchemy it is generally quite a bit of math, a huge amount of contract law and due diligence, often an impressive amount of ops work, and a dusting of technology that web devs would recognize as such.
ALL

More from Software

C\U000100cfrtex Futura
C𐃏rtex Futura
@cortexfutura
[[Knowledge Management]], [[Reproducible [[Social [[Science]]]]]], and [[Academic Workflow]]s – 100 Tweets for @threadapalooza 2020, let's go
#roamcult #𐃏
1/100

Pandoc is a magical piece of software, and if you're not using it for your academic writing you're missing out. Compile (basically) any document format to (basically) any other document format.
2/100

While Pandoc is fantastic, it's a bit like ffmpeg: extremely powerful, but without GUI apps too few people will use it. ffmpeg has a ton of GUI apps that basically just wrap the CLI, Pandoc doesn't have enough of them.
3/100

Citekeys + CSL files + Pandoc can easily cut ~10+ hours from your writing workflow. Citekeys come from LaTeX-Land, you can use them through Pandoc with anything. And CSL files make it super easy to switch citation styles.
4/100

Since many journals have their own version of popular formats, every journal should be required to publish a CSL file, LaTeX and Word Pandoc template ready for submission. I don't want to think about the collective hours wasted formatting stuff for submission.
5/100
SOFTWARE
Jarang keramas
Jarang keramas
@khvfaid
ㅤ

SHARE KOLEKSI WALLPAPER PART 2

••• A THREAD •••

ㅤ


https://t.co/vettK8txaI


https://t.co/IVbf4RTVUk


https://t.co/J3MlhTBIng


https://t.co/qaWXpsmP2E
SOFTWARE
Advertisement
Pratham \U0001f468\u200d\U0001f4bb\U0001f680
Pratham 👨‍💻🚀...
@Prathkum
Let's create Phineas using CSS in few simple steps😄

THREAD🧵


STEP 1. Create a head

create a triangle and rotate it so that it looks like a head


STEP 2. Create smile and ear

We have a pseudo elements in CSS, so we can create smile and ear using head::after and head::before


STEP 3. Create eyes

This is the most trickiest part because in order to make an eye we have to create

- One bigger white circle
- then a small black pupil inside white circle
- then a small white reflection in black pupil

Let's create a outer white circle first


STEP 3(I). Create a black pupil

We can create pupil using pseudo element
SOFTWARE , SNIPPETS
Opemipo Disu\U0001f680
Opemipo Disu🚀
@coderoflagos
Are you a Designer or a Developer?👨‍💻

Here are some Google Chrome extensions that can make you better in 2021. 🔥🍀

(Thread) 🧵👇

1. https://t.co/zGir5E5U0J: https://t.co/PVx1wlX0Se is the easiest way to stay updated on the latest programming news. Get the hottest dev news from the best tech blogs on any topic you can think of.

2. CSS Peeper: CSS Peeper is a CSS viewer tailored for Designers. Get access to useful styles with our Chrome extension. Its mission is to let Designers focus on design, and spend as little time as possible digging in a

3. UX Check: UX Check makes heuristic evaluations quick and easy. The extension will open up Nielsen's Ten Heuristics in a side pane next to your website.

4. Checkbot: Checkbot finds critical SEO, speed & security problems before your website visitors do
Tests 100s of pages at once for broken links, duplicate titles, invalid HTML, insecure pages, and 50+ other
SOFTWARE
foone
foone
@Foone
I'm pretty sure whoever designed this control usually makes gender selectors for websites...

Poly Bridge has a language SLIDER.


all languages exist on a spectrum from English to 한국어


next I want to see a game with a "choose language" button and it brings up this language map like it's a skill tree


gonna spend 200 XP to unlock Tamil

that's from
SOFTWARE

You May Also Like

Shalini Singh Sengar
Shalini Singh Sengar
@Maverickmusafir
Post Independence, Army wanted to select the most experienced Indian commander as Army chief. But Nehru without consulting anyone appointed Gen Rob Lockhart, a senior British Army officer as the Commander-in-Chief (C-in-C) of the Indian Army.


Most people were shocked to know that Nehru selected a British Man after fighting for independence for over 200 years! Major Gen A A ‘Jick’ Rudra of the Indian Army was completely upset with the decision.


One day Lockhart met Nehru with a strategic plan and proposed many government directive defence policies for the country. He placed it on the table and explained the point to PM Nehru. After a while Lockhart walked out of the room and met AA Jick Rudra,+

Lockhart looked shell shocked and stunned. When asked what happened he said “The PM took one look at my paper and blew his top. Rubbish! Total rubbish! We don’t need a defence plan. Our policy is ahimsa (non-violence). We foresee no military threats. Scrap the army!”

One year after the incident the Kashmir crisis had increased and Gen Lockhart used to exchange ideas with the Gen Douglas Gracey who was commander in chief of Pakistan Army.There were many infiltrations along the border which Lockhart knew and took no action. But Lt Gen Cariappa+
HISTORY
foone
foone
@Foone
It is 2018 and this error message is a mistake from 1974.
This limitation, which is still found in the very latest Windows 10, dates back to BEFORE STAR WARS. This bug is as old as Watergate.


When this was developed, nothing had UPC codes yet because they'd just been invented.
Back when this mistake was made, There was only one Phone Company, because they hadn't been broken up yet. Ted Bundy was still on the loose. Babe Ruth's home run record was about to fall.

When this bug was developed, Wheel of Fortune hadn't yet aired. No one had seen Rocky Horror. Steven Spielberg was still a little-known directory of TV films and one box-office disappointment. SNL hadn't aired yet. The Edmund Fitzgerald was still hauling iron ore.

WHEN THIS STUPID MISFEATURE WAS INVENTED, THE GODFATHER PART II HAD JUST OPENED IN THEATERS.

So, why does this happen? So Unix (which was only 5 years old at this point) had the good idea of "everything is a file" which mean you could do things like write to sockets, pipes, the console, etc with the same commands and instructions.
TECH
Advertisement
John Hayward
John Hayward
@Doc_0
Funny, before the election I recall lefties muttering the caravan must have been a Trump setup because it made the open borders crowd look so bad. Why would the pro-migrant crowd engineer a crisis that played into Trump's hands? THIS is why. THESE are the "optics" they wanted.


This media manipulation effort was inspired by the success of the "kids in cages" freakout, a 100% Stalinist propaganda drive that required people to forget about Obama putting migrant children in cells. It worked, so now they want pics of Trump "gassing children on the border."

There's a heavy air of Pallywood around the whole thing as well. If the Palestinians can stage huge theatrical performances of victimhood with the willing cooperation of Western media, why shouldn't the migrant caravan organizers expect the same?

It's business as usual for Anarchy, Inc. - the worldwide shredding of national sovereignty to increase the power of transnational organizations and left-wing ideology. Many in the media are true believers. Others just cannot resist the narrative of "change" and "social justice."

The product sold by Anarchy, Inc. is victimhood. It always boils down to the same formula: once the existing order can be painted as oppressors and children as their victims, chaos wins and order loses. Look at the lefties shrieking in unison about "Trump gassing children" today.
POLITICS
\u092c\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0939\u094d\u092e\u0923\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u093e \u0907\u0924\u093f\u0939\u093e\u0938\U0001f441\ufe0f\U0001f441\ufe0f
ब्राह्मणों का इतिहास👁️...
@BRAHMIN_0052
MOHIYAL_BRAHMIN_KING
RAJA_PORUS
King_Porus_History

1)King Porus was a famous Indian king, his real name was #Purushotama. He belonged to PURU tribe mentioned in #RIG_VEDA, the Ancient books of India.


2) Porus ruled the Punjab region and expanded his kingdom between the Jhelum River and Chenab River in the Indian Subcontinent. He was a legendary warrior and more war skills. He made the army most powerful with war skills. Even Alexander had also made difficulty to defeat Porus.

3)Word of Mouth Oral tradition in #Mohyal_Brahmin families since ancient times has kept the Great Saga of their Great Elder known to them as Maharaja “ #Puru” alive.

4) When #Alexander the Great invaded India in 326 BC he was challenged near Taxila by a mere chieftain of the Area. He was King #Porus, a #Vaid_Mohyal. After his encounter with Porus, Alexander met with more resistance near Multan where the forces were predominantly #Mohyal.

5)The Bali rulers of Multan fiercely engaged with Alexander's army in skirmishes in which many senior Generals died. Later during the long and bitter fighting in #Multan, Alexander got hurt by an arrow which pierced his chest ,
RELIGION
STEALTH JEFF
STEALTH JEFF
@drawandstrike
Here is Editor-in-Chief of the @EpochTimes, @JasperFakkert's response to the slanted hit piece that @Buzzfeed's @HayesBrown put up 2 days ago:

Brown's article at Buzzfeed starts off pretending it's some kind of really off-the-wall notion that Hillary Clinton paid for the creation of the Steele Dossier that was then used to justify the FBI's spying on the Trump campaign & transition team.


After that awful start, he swerves to making accusations that the Epoch Times is connected to the 'cult' Falon Gong.

You can read the article here:

Brown insinuates with no real evidence whatsoever that the Epoch Times is 'Falon Gong-linked'.

The 'evidence' he supplies in his article to 'prove' @EpochTimes is 'Falon Gong-linked is this:

1) the Epoch Times' extensive *news coverage* of China's attempts to wipe out Falon Gong with intense persecution directed at the group since 1999.

2) a reporter *shouting a question in 2006* at then-President George W. Bush about China's persecution of Falon Gong members.
ALL