https://t.co/uWmEqLo2Hs
THE MILGRAM EXPERIMENTS

"Milgram (1963) examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War 2, Nuremberg War trials. Their defence often was based on "obedience", they were just following orders from their superiors."

"Milgram (1963) wanted to investigate whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority figures as this was a common explanation for the Nazi killings in World War II."
https://t.co/HzjxIr5KWN
https://t.co/Pqd1v2giaH
"-Milgram (1963) was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. "
https://t.co/kLajE3PUmL
https://t.co/KsY6KlpPTW
https://t.co/5RY20VxBYR
ARE YOU GETTING THIS NOW???
https://t.co/ORf4lJZerX
Results:
65% (two-thirds) of participants (i.e., teachers) continued to the highest level of 450 volts. All the participants continued to 300 volts. Milgram did more than one experiment – he carried out 18 variations of his study -
- All he did was alter the situation (IV) to see how this affected obedience (DV).
Conclusion:

"Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figure, even to the extent of killing an innocent human being. Obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up."
"People tend to obey orders from other people if they recognize their authority as morally right and/or legally based. This response to legitimate authority is learned in a variety of situations, for example in the family, school, and workplace."
https://t.co/vwVIvSBNqc
https://t.co/I8j1AHN5R9
https://t.co/O7mQ49D7Ua
https://t.co/cG9fGprWKR
https://t.co/mb805fgW6m
https://t.co/k3tMPsY7Jr
https://t.co/CKKoE3vk2f
https://t.co/dyUPMEq1P3
https://t.co/Wt1PJjslfj
https://t.co/lvUK8p0pxL
https://t.co/9wSYhI4aL7
https://t.co/33kjH01Ejn
"Milgram summed up in the article “The Perils of Obedience” (Milgram 1974), writing:
'The legal and philosophic aspects of obedience are of enormous import, but they say very little about how most people behave in concrete situations. "
"I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist."
"Stark authority was pitted against the subjects’ [participants’] strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects’ [participants’] ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not."
"The extreme willingness of adults to go to almost any lengths on the command of an authority constitutes the chief finding of the study and the fact most urgently demanding explanation."
Do YOU not think, the Deep State, don't know all this?

More from Duncan J Campbell

https://t.co/ukabnTVViq

https://t.co/IFCWPEFyIy
2019
"In China and India alone, an estimated 2 million baby girls go "missing" each year. They are selectively aborted, killed as newborns, or abandoned and left to die."

https://t.co/wtIt7fUoKU
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Female Infanticide in China
Bernice J. Lee

https://t.co/Hg91jjtZFW
In the early 1980s there were 108 male births to every 100 female, only slightly above natural rate; by 2000 that had soared to 120 males, some provinces, such as Anhui, Jiangxi/Shaanxi, to more than 130. The result is more than 35 million women "missing"

https://t.co/C7A3t8mnyp
2012
"In China, a ”one-child” policy, enforced by the state with forced sterilizations and abortions, exacerbates gendercide"
What is going on at SWANSEA UNIVERSITY in Wales?
1.
https://t.co/d5NKtNlxxa
Sounds as if its connected to Bill Gates "LUCIFERASE" Vaccine?

2.
https://t.co/k0w1mjaPg0

"HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON SCHOOL OF LAW"
- AT SWANSEA UNIVERSITY!!!


3.
https://t.co/jifuWq6cGq
Remember all those FIRES, over the Summer!!!

4.
https://t.co/H3lstFyYx8
WUHAN PARTNERSHIP

"Links between Swansea & Wuhan date back to 1855 when Swansea missionary Griffith John founded the Wuhan Union Hospital.
This relationship was strengthened when representatives of the two cities signed an agreement".


5.
https://t.co/5b1JqiEQzi
Swansea University Strengthens Links with China
https://t.co/tsTubhXYFM
2018
"Bribery and corruption in the NHS ‘being underreported"
The NHSCFA calculated that fraud costs the NHS £1.29bn each year, in its annual report and accounts – enough to pay for more than 40,000 staff nurses or to buy 5,000 ambulances."


1.


2.


3.


https://t.co/YPfXciseV0
4.

2017

More from Science

Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

https://t.co/mzS7vVSREJ

https://t.co/353PdAX2fa

https://t.co/3yBImjOdd4

In some cases, almost 100% of the light energy can be converted to the second harmonic frequency. These cases typically involve intense pulsed laser beams passing through large crystals, and careful alignment to obtain phase matching.
So it turns out that an organization I thought was doing good work, the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (associated with Center for Inquiry, James Randi, and Martin Gardner) was actually caping for pedophiles. Uhhhh oops?


Since this, bizarrely, turned out to be one of my longest videos ever (??) here's a quick thread to sum it up for those of you like myself with short attention spans. 1/10

In the '90s the False Memory Syndrome Foundation was founded to call attention to the problem of adults suddenly "remembering" child abuse that never actually happened, often under hypnosis. Skeptics like James Randi & Martin Gardner joined their board. 2/10

A new article reveals that the FMSF was founded by parents who had been credibly and PRIVATELY accused of molestation by their now-adult daughter. They publicized the accusation, destroyed the daughter's reputation, and started the foundation. 3/10

The FMSF assumed any accused pedo who joined was innocent, saying "We are a good-looking bunch of people, graying hair, well dressed, healthy, smiling; just about every person who has attended is someone you would surely find interesting and want to count as a friend" 😬 4/10

You May Also Like

1/ Here’s a list of conversational frameworks I’ve picked up that have been helpful.

Please add your own.

2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you


3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.

“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”

“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”

4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:

“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”

“What’s end-game here?”

“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”

5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:

“What would the best version of yourself do”?