An interesting thing about carp is that they can go into anoxic hibernation and switch to an anaerobic metabolism based on converting glycogen to ethanol.

The waste ethanol is diffused out the gills

https://t.co/V3D1umHf04

Carp can switch over to an anaerobic metabolism and quietly exhale booze until the situation gets better.
They basically evolved the same metabolic pathway as yeast, independently.

In theory, if you spent a few thousand years breeding carp for it, you could use them to make booze.

They'd be enormous, almost entirely glycogen deposits with a fish added as an afterthought.
The really interesting thing about anaerobic carp, is that they can go 4-5 months without oxygen by relying on liver glycogen.

You, a human, have only about 100 grams of glycogen in your liver, about 400 more grams in your skeletal muscles. Call it 500 grams total.
In humans, glycogen is also burned for energy. This is where the marathon runner's bonk comes from: you only have about 2,000 calories worth, and running a marathon burns those 2,000 calories.
You have far, far too little glycogen in you to go anaerobic like the friendly carp.

Carp can be 12% glycogen by weight.

A 75kg human would need to have 9kg of glycogen to match their carp friend.

https://t.co/Bt29kS7pO5
Even if you did have 18x more glycogen than other humans, and the necessary pyruvate decarboxylase pathways to use it, you'd still have problems.
For one, that 9kg of glycogen would provide about 36,000 calories of anaerobic respiration.

Call it 18 days worth. You'd need a lot more if you wanted to beat your carp friend at holding your breaths.
For another, you'd *also* have to get rid of the lactic acid and ethanol.

You currently do this in the liver, by further metabolizing ethanol into acetaldehyde.

You do this completely differently depending on whether you're a fetus or not.
You'd not only need a vastly, vastly larger amount of glycogen, but a way of excreting the waste products more efficient than liver processing and the citric acid cycle and such.
In humans, of all ages, ethanol is itself metabolized into waste products like acetic acid and acetyl-CoA, this is the citric acid cycle. You already rely on this to survive.

https://t.co/gsnliVwr3G
However, to be more like a carp, this is simply not good enough. Far, far too much ethanol, far too few places it's metabolized.

You're gonna need a bigger liver or a better way
The simplest solution is to engineer a symbiotic relationship with acetic acid bacteria, perhaps reforming the liver into an enormous swollen mass of bacteria-riddled flesh.
But then you've got an acetic acid disposal problem.

You're gonna scare your carp friends by pissing vinegar at them.
The inelegant solution is that you're gonna need to be hooked up to a waterproof combined liver and kidney dialysis machine, to basically bypass both those organs with the power of modern technology.
So, there you are, with a 75kg mass of glycogen stores on an otherwise stick-thin fragile body, wearing a whirring dialysis machine hooked straight into you. At intervals it shits out vinegar pellets that drop down to the ocean floor below you.

Now you can hang out with a carp.

More from Anosognosiogenesis

So you want to generate interesting melodies.

1. Make a file called 1235.txt containing, one per line, all 24 unique permutations of the elements 1 2 3 5.


2. Cp 1235.txt to D.txt

3. Use sed to convert the numbers in D.txt to notes. Now you have 24 permutations of the major tetrachord in D.

4. Play them each. If it sounds like it increases tension, mark the beginning of that cell in 1235.txt with a +. If it sounds like it decreases tension, mark with a -.

Now those 24 melodic cells are divided into two groups: tension increasers and resolvers.

5. Rinse and repeat for all 12 keys.

You now have 13 plaintext files, filled with stuff like + 1 2 5 3 and - D E F# A

6. Figuratively roll dice to decide, given a +/- cell, what the next cell should be.

33% chance a + follows a +, etc.

Now you're outputting a stream of dynamic tensions: ++-+++-+-+---+ etc
Look at some historical examples of mass psychogenic illnesses: dancing plagues, laughing plagues, meowing nuns,

Here's a video on them:

They are interesting, but what is more interesting to me is Culture Bound Syndrome.
https://t.co/hMKaApUMZn

Basically: mass psychogenic illness, and presentation of various mental illnesses, do not occur in a vacuum. Cultures shape them.

For instance, Koro.

There have been several mass outbreaks of men completely convinced their penises are shrinking, anchoring them with string at night so they don't get sucked back inside.

Almost all in Southeast

Here's a description of one outbreak in Hainan in 1984:

More from Science

"NO LONGER BEST IN THE WORLD"
UNEP's new Human Development Index includes a new (separate) index: Planetary pressures-adjusted HDI (PHDI). News in Norway is that its position drops from #1 to #16 because of this, while Ireland rises from #2 to #1.
Why?

https://t.co/aVraIEzRfh


Check out Norway's 'Domestic Material Consumption'. Fossil fuels are no different here to Ireland's. What's different is this huge 'non-metallic minerals' category.
(Note also the jump in 1998, suggesting data problems.)
https://t.co/5QvzONbqmN


In Norway's case, it looks like the apparent consumption equation (production+imports-exports) for non-metal minerals is dominated by production: extraction of material in Norway.
https://t.co/5QvzONbqmN


And here we see that this production of non-metallic minerals is sand, gravel and crushed rock for construction. So it's about Norway's geology.
https://t.co/y6rqWmFVWc


Norway drops 15 places on the PHDI list not because of its CO₂ emissions (fairly high at 41st highest in the world per capita), but because of its geology, because it shifts a lot of rock whenever it builds anything.

You May Also Like

1/ Here’s a list of conversational frameworks I’ve picked up that have been helpful.

Please add your own.

2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you


3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.

“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”

“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”

4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:

“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”

“What’s end-game here?”

“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”

5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:

“What would the best version of yourself do”?