Sources : Makkal Neethi Maiyam Chief Kamalhasan was furious for my interview that I termed him a B Team of BJP. Link of the interview is as follows :

Kamalhassan furiously tweeted, “ I am not anyone’s B Team”
An hour ago, Kamal tweeted as follows : Two girls, “Arshitha Agarwal” and “Kunisha Agarwal” had helped poor students, who are not able to get gadgets 2/n
to help poor students for attending online classes.
People are wondering who are these Arshitha Agarwal and Kunisha Agarwal. They both are the daughters of Chennai City Commissioner Mahesh Kumar Agarwal IPS. 3/n
Today morning, I tweeted, in regard to the participation of Mahesh Kumar Agarwal’s daughters in the event held at Chennai CoP office with regard to the above event where iPads were distributed for poor girls, which was held in Chennai Commissioner’s office. 4/n
While it is a semi-official function, Mahesh Kumar’s Agarwal’s daughters participated in the event.
I had tweeted as follows : “The @chennaipolice_ Commissioner is doing a great job of distributing free iPads to poor students with the help of NGOs. 5/n
But is this an official function or his family outing ? Why are his daughters present in such events ? Will he allow his subordinates to do this in CoP office ?”
While it is a fact that the event distributing iPads to poor children, did happen, entire cost 5/n
of iPads were born by the firm HCL.

Neither Mahesh Kumar Agarwal or his daughters had any role to play in it. However, Mahesh Kumar Agarwal’s both daughters participated in the event, for which Mahesh directed all senior officers in Chennai to participate. 6/n
Almost all the officers participated Chennai City Commissioner’s office is a public office, a government office. It is not a picnic spot. What I had questioned was why were City Commissioner Mahesh Kumar Agarwal’s daughters present in the event. 7/n
By evening Kamalhassan, whom I had described as BJP’s B Team has tweeted naming the two daughters of Mahesh Kumar Agarwal – Arshita Agarwal and Kunisha Agarwal. Connected images will follow. 8/n
RSS Chief Mohan Bhagawat, whenever he visits Chennai will stay in the house of Vikram Agarwal, proprietor of Vikram Agarwal, proprietor of Radisson Blu, Chennai. He is an accused in the IPL betting scam. This is the same Vikram Agarwal who made Mahesh Kumar Agarwal IPS, 9/n
as the Chennai City Commissioner.
Kindly connect the dots.

More information about Mahesh Kumar Agarwal to follow. 10/10

More from Savukku_Shankar

More from Politics

What does "patriots in control" mean?
What would that "look like" in reality?


So a massive adult film star in all his glory is included in an official FBI government filing


Hunter Biden's book is categorized as "Chinese


TIME admits to "conspiracy" to "not rig, rather


A "pillow guy" has military-grade intercepts detailing the IP addresses and device MAC IDs of EVERY incursion into every county in the
All the challenges to Leader Pelosi are coming from her right, in an apparent effort to make the party even more conservative and bent toward corporate interests.

Hard pass. So long as Leader Pelosi remains the most progressive candidate for Speaker, she can count on my support.


I agree that our party should, and must, evolve our leadership.

But changed leadership should reflect an actual, evolved mission; namely, an increased commitment to the middle + working class electorate that put us here.

Otherwise it’s a just new figure with the same problems.

I hope that we can move swiftly to conclude this discussion about party positions, so that we can spend more time discussing party priorities: voting rights, healthcare, wages, climate change, housing, cannabis legalization, good jobs, etc.
This idea - that elections should translate into policy - is not wrong at all. But political science can help explain why it's not working this way. There are three main explanations: 1. mandates are constructed, not automatic, 2. party asymmetry, 3. partisan conpetition 1/


First, party/policy mandates from elections are far from self-executing in our system. Work on mandates from Dahl to Ellis and Kirk on the history of the mandate to mine on its role in post-Nixon politics, to Peterson Grossback and Stimson all emphasize that this link is... 2/

Created deliberately and isn't always persuasive. Others have to convinced that the election meant a particular thing for it to work in a legislative context. I theorized in the immediate period of after the 2020 election that this was part of why Repubs signed on to ...3/

Trump's demonstrably false fraud nonsense - it derailed an emerging mandate news cycle. Winners of elections get what they get - institutional control - but can't expect much beyond that unless the perception of an election mandate takes hold. And it didn't. 4/

Let's turn to the legislation element of this. There's just an asymmetry in terms of passing a relief bill. Republicans are presumably less motivated to get some kind of deal passed. Democrats are more likely to want to do *something.* 5/

You May Also Like