Good morning.

Hours after a federal judge in Michigan REJECTED their election-toppling request, Lin Wood and Sidney Powell go to another U.S. judge seeking to overturn Georgia's results.

I'll cover the hearing for @LawCrimeNews in this thread.

ICYMI:

Background:

This is a case where the 11th Circuit rejected an interlocutory appeal seeking a restraining order.

ICYMI: "Eleventh Circuit Dismisses Sidney Powell and Lin Wood’s Appeal in Georgia Kraken Case: The Answer Is ‘No’" via @Matt_Naham https://t.co/1fN3cCx53X
We begin.

Judge Batten recites the conspiracy theory behind the lawsuit and repeats Ga. officials' question:

"Why would Georgia's Republican governor and Republican Secretary of State," whom he notes are Trump supporters, "conspire to throw the election" to POTUS-elect Biden?
It's a question that many people are thinking, Judge Batten notes.

Judge Batten explains the doctrine of laches, which has killed many a Trump suit.

"The law is pretty clear that a party cannot obtain the extraordinary remedy of injunctive relief unless he acts quickly."
Judge Batten notes that Lin Wood and Sidney Powell ask him to throw out the election and declare Trump the winner.
He says he will hear arguments on the motion to dismiss now, before addressing technical difficulties leading to a scratchy backdrop.

#CourtInTheAgeofCOVID
Attorney Carey Miller is up first for Georgia:

"I think you hit the nail on the head as to what these issues are," he tells a judge, before adding the case does not belong in this court.

"If the plaintiffs wanted the results which they seek," they'd go to state court, he says.
In fact, a state court case is coming up this afternoon, he adds!
The attorney notes that every other suit has failed.

Ga.'s attorney Carey Miller: "Georgia laws are constitutional. Georgia elections are constitutional. Georgia machines are constitutional.
Ga.'s attorney Carey Miller: "What are the acts of the state that are at issue?"

He adds he's not talking about "mullahs in Iran," whom the Kraken team roped into their election conspiracy theories.
Ga.'s attorney Carey Miller: "One way or another, the result they seek is judicial fiat changing electoral results."
Ga.'s attorney Carey Miller notes that Lin Wood and Sidney Powell chose a made-up "relief" sought, even if they had grounds:

"The relief sought is not to declare someone else a winner. It's to have another election."

Listen in on the hearing here: https://t.co/qIhSjXPxXH
Ga.'s attorney Carey Miller notes the new Michigan ruling dismissing the Kraken crew:

He notes the same issues in that case are at issue here.

https://t.co/THpM45EJWG
Ga.'s attorney Carey Miller says the same is true of the suit where Lin Wood appeared as a plaintiff rather than a lawyer, and Trump-appointed Judge Grimberg rejected his request on laches, and other grounds. https://t.co/i1hFFNVNhc
Correction:

GA's attorney who is up now is Joshua Barrett Belinfante.

Carey Miller is addressing a different aspect of the arguments later, Belinfante just noted.

With audio hearings, these mix-ups happen. Onwards.
Attorney Amanda R. Callais is up now on behalf of various Democratic entities:

"Plaintiffs have failed to state any cognizable claim."

"Over a month ago, 5 million Georgians cast their ballots in the 2020 elections, with the majority choosing Joseph R. Biden."
Callais: Those votes were counted by hand and recounted.

"At this point, there is simply no question" the POTUS-elect Joe Biden won the election and earned all of the electors in Georgia.
Callais:

"When we talk about a possibility of fraud, that does not mean that fraud actually occurred."

"That is not in their complaint. That is not in their evidence."

A Michigan judge noted the same in her rejection of the injunction.
Echoing the Trump-appointed Third Circuit judge who threw out a similar suit, Callais says:

“Voters, not lawyers, choose the President. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections.”

Read that ruling here: https://t.co/7CiENfRbJB
Callais:

In finding that this court cannot grant this relief, the court would not be alone. It'd be in good company.

Context from me: Trump and his allies have lost dozens like it.
Callais: "There have been more than 30 challenges to this election that have been dismissed."

It would be in good company of a judge "right down the hall from here," referring to Trump-appointed Judge Grimberg's rejection of Lin Wood's election-toppling bid.
The difference between the suit where Judge Grimberg rejected relief and this one is that the one being heard now seeks broader disenfranchisement, Callais notes.
Sidney Powell is up, claiming "abject fraud" committed and lying about Dominion's ties to deceased Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez.

Note: It isn't.
Dominion's Q&A on Powell's fever dreams:

"The company has no ownership ties whatsoever to UBS, or the governments of China, Cuba, or Venezuela." https://t.co/RJIh2vV0HQ
Judge presses Powell showing she's going to the wrong court.

Powell claims she has the right to go to this federal court.

Judge asks her to address finding: "We cannot turn back the clock and create a world where the 2020 elections were not certified."

Yes we can, Powell says.
Powell claims Bush v. Gore stands for that proposition.

(That decision allowed a certification for Bush by a narrow margin to stand; it decertified nothing.)

Trump lost Georgia by more than 11K.
Judge: Even if you won here, how would this not be moot because wouldn't Trump still lose even if he won Georgia.

Powell, imaginatively. "Yes, [Trump] can win the election... It is nowhere near over."
Powell recites an alphabet soup of conspiracy theories that defy live-tweeting.
Powell:

"That is why it is so important that we at least get temporary relief to at least examine the systems."

They want to "examine" the machines to seek evidence to substantiate the far-flung conspiracy theories.
Judge Batten tells Sidney Powell that "rule of law" requires courts to follow procedure and precedent.
Judge Batten tells Sidney Powell that she has a "glib" response to 11th Circuit precedent prohibiting the hearing of "freewheeling" theories and grievances.

"Why shouldn't the state of Georgia investigate this? Why should a federal judge?"
Judge Batten on her client's standing: "It doesn't sound like your clients are special."
Rebuttal argument debunks Sidney Powell's fake history and fake law of Bush v. Gore:

"Bush v. Gore stayed a Florida recount. It did not decertify a Florida election."
Rebuttal:

"They tell you the voters lack confidence in the election system."

He notes that courts have stuck with the state of Georgia.

"The state is doing what it can to enhance public confidence, that's why we did the extra step of a hand count."
Judge Batten said "even if he accepted" the conspiracy theories as true, he must dismiss.

Allowing it to stand would be "judicial activism," he says. https://t.co/xcuwlPWbe4

More from Adam Klasfeld

More from Politics

I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.


Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel

He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:

He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:

He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
"3 million people are estimated not to have official photo ID, with ethnic minorities more at risk". They will "have to contact their council to confirm their ID if they want to vote"

This is shameful legislation, that does nothing to tackle the problems with UK elections.THREAD


There is no evidence in-person voter fraud is a problem, and it wd be near-impossible to organise on an effective scale. Campaign finance violations, digital disinformation & manipulation of postal voting are bigger issues, but these are crimes of the powerful, not the powerless.

In a democracy, anything that makes it harder to vote - in particular, anything that disadvantages one group of voters - should face an extremely high bar. Compulsory voter ID takes a hammer to 3 million legitimate voters (disproportionately poor & BAME) to crack an imaginary nut

If the government is concerned about the purity of elections, it should reflect on its own conduct. In 2019 it circulated doctored news footage of an opponent, disguised its twitter feed as a fake fact-checking site, and ran adverts so dishonest that even Facebook took them down.

Britain's electoral law largely predates the internet. There is little serious regulation of online campaigning or the cash that pays for it. That allows unscrupulous campaigners to ignore much of the legal framework erected since the C19th to guard against electoral misconduct.

You May Also Like

And here they are...

THE WINNERS OF THE 24 HOUR STARTUP CHALLENGE

Remember, this money is just fun. If you launched a product (or even attempted a launch) - you did something worth MUCH more than $1,000.

#24hrstartup

The winners 👇

#10

Lattes For Change - Skip a latte and save a life.

https://t.co/M75RAirZzs

@frantzfries built a platform where you can see how skipping your morning latte could do for the world.

A great product for a great cause.

Congrats Chris on winning $250!


#9

Instaland - Create amazing landing pages for your followers.

https://t.co/5KkveJTAsy

A team project! @bpmct and @BaileyPumfleet built a tool for social media influencers to create simple "swipe up" landing pages for followers.

Really impressive for 24 hours. Congrats!


#8

SayHenlo - Chat without distractions

https://t.co/og0B7gmkW6

Built by @DaltonEdwards, it's a platform for combatting conversation overload. This product was also coded exclusively from an iPad 😲

Dalton is a beast. I'm so excited he placed in the top 10.


#7

CoderStory - Learn to code from developers across the globe!

https://t.co/86Ay6nF4AY

Built by @jesswallaceuk, the project is focused on highlighting the experience of developers and people learning to code.

I wish this existed when I learned to code! Congrats on $250!!
A THREAD ON @SarangSood

Decoded his way of analysis/logics for everyone to easily understand.

Have covered:
1. Analysis of volatility, how to foresee/signs.
2. Workbook
3. When to sell options
4. Diff category of days
5. How movement of option prices tell us what will happen

1. Keeps following volatility super closely.

Makes 7-8 different strategies to give him a sense of what's going on.

Whichever gives highest profit he trades in.


2. Theta falls when market moves.
Falls where market is headed towards not on our original position.


3. If you're an options seller then sell only when volatility is dropping, there is a high probability of you making the right trade and getting profit as a result

He believes in a market operator, if market mover sells volatility Sarang Sir joins him.


4. Theta decay vs Fall in vega

Sell when Vega is falling rather than for theta decay. You won't be trapped and higher probability of making profit.