Dreams in the first quarter(पहर) of the day give result in one year, if the dreams are in the second quarter(प्रहर) the results are in eight months, for third the dreams are fulfilled in three months,
MEANING, EXPLANATION & INTERPRETATION OF YOUR DREAMS, ALSO ITS EFFECTS IN COMING DAYS
Sigmund Freud had explained the interpretation of dreams in the last century, but our scriptures explained this thousands of years back. What is the significance and meaning of our dreams.
Dreams in the first quarter(पहर) of the day give result in one year, if the dreams are in the second quarter(प्रहर) the results are in eight months, for third the dreams are fulfilled in three months,
If you dream during your tense and worrisome period those are never realized. People with Negative traits never get their dreams fulfilled.
You will gain wealth if you see the following things in your dream- cow,elephant, horse, palace, climbing mountains or trees,
You will attain more land if you see someone
singing with veena in his hands.
You will attain amrit if you see yourself entering a red sea or entering into narak.
If you see yourself in iron chains you will attain fame or a son.
You are about to become a King or a leader if you dream and see a broken leaf with curd.
If you are in pain or see a monkey, fish, pearl, conch, diamond, blood, chandan, creepers and mango in a dream, you will be rich.
If you see a statue or a shivling then you will be victorious in your endeavor.
If you see Sun and Moon you will remain healthy.
If you see a smiling Brahmin lady coming to your house you will be getting something that you immensely like.
If someone gives you a flower in your hand you will get the Punya of tirth Snan.
If you see yourself donating something to a Brahmin you will be wealthy.
You will be a great scholar if you dream of a eight year old child or see anybody giving you a book or a mother/ father teaching you,
You will attain a mantra siddhi if someone whispers mantra in your ear in your dream.
Someone giving you a white grain in dreams makes you a King.
Seeing a dream of well, pond, lake white mountain and white snakes makes you rich.
The Brahmin that you see in dreams is actually a swaroop of Shiv and Vishnu. Brahmini is Laxmi or Parvati swaroop. Radha comes as gwalin and children are Bal gopal.
Instagram link👇
https://t.co/l3vxrVadGj
Facebook page link👇
https://t.co/zXjYSQKZrK
Source - Brahma Vaivartva puran
https://t.co/W2jnWlziJC
https://t.co/HTVb4OrefP
#\u0936\u093e\u0938\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u094b\u0902_\u092e\u0948\u0902_\u0938\u092a\u0928\u094b\u0902_\u0915\u093e_\u092e\u0939\u0924\u094d\u0935
— \u092a\u0902\u0921\u093f\u0924 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u093e\u0932 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u094b\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f (@VishalS50533075) February 16, 2021
\u0938\u093f\u0917\u092e\u0902\u0921 \u092b\u094d\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0921 \u0928\u0947 \u092a\u093f\u091b\u0932\u0940 \u0938\u0926\u0940 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0938\u092a\u0928\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0940 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0916\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0915\u0940 \u0925\u0940, \u0932\u0947\u0915\u093f\u0928 \u0939\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u0936\u093e\u0938\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u094b\u0902 \u0928\u0947 \u0939\u091c\u093e\u0930\u094b\u0902 \u0938\u093e\u0932 \u092a\u0939\u0932\u0947 \u0907\u0938\u0947 \u0938\u092e\u091d\u093e\u092f\u093e \u0925\u093e\u0964 \u0939\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u0938\u092a\u0928\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u093e \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094d\u0935 \u0914\u0930 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u0925 \u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0939\u0948\u0964 pic.twitter.com/aWBTCAmrpI
More from Anshul Pandey
WRONG!
Buddha avatar is not Fake it is mentioned in many Sanatan scriptures. I will give you references from Sanatan scriptures with the SS.
So lets start...
1) Harivansh Puran(1.41.164)
2)Bhagwat Puran(1.3.24)
3)Bhagwat Puran(2.7.37)
4)Garud Puran
Buddha avatar is not Fake it is mentioned in many Sanatan scriptures. I will give you references from Sanatan scriptures with the SS.
So lets start...
One of the copy of Bhagwad Geeta as sold by ISKCON says that Buddha was Vishnu Avatar. Fake info.
— Jaimine (@jaiminism) April 8, 2021
1) Harivansh Puran(1.41.164)
2)Bhagwat Puran(1.3.24)
3)Bhagwat Puran(2.7.37)
4)Garud Puran
WHY DID KING DAKSH BEHAVE NEGATIVELY TOWARDS SHIVA AND SATI.
It was actually the shakti form of devi which took birth as Sati in Daksh's house who acquired this name due to her satya swarup.
Everyone is aware of the story as to why Sati jumped into the Yagya fire.
But there is a story behind the reason for the negative behaviour of Daksh.
It so happened that once Rishi Durvasa went to Devi Jambunadeshwari and after her darshan recited the Mayabeej mantra. The devi happily gave him a divine Garland. Durvasa happily accepted it and left.
On his way he met Daksh who was eager to get the divine Garland. He requested the Rishi to give him that Garland. Knowing that Daksh was a good person, Durvasa gave the garland to him.
But Daksh casually kept the garland on his bed and went about doing his earthly instinctive work. Due to this insulting behaviour of Daksh for the divine garland, he developed a negative feeling for Shiva and Sati(Aadi Shakti).
Source - Devi puran
Instagram link👇
https://t.co/papGLZvcaI
Facebook
It was actually the shakti form of devi which took birth as Sati in Daksh's house who acquired this name due to her satya swarup.
Everyone is aware of the story as to why Sati jumped into the Yagya fire.
But there is a story behind the reason for the negative behaviour of Daksh.
It so happened that once Rishi Durvasa went to Devi Jambunadeshwari and after her darshan recited the Mayabeej mantra. The devi happily gave him a divine Garland. Durvasa happily accepted it and left.
On his way he met Daksh who was eager to get the divine Garland. He requested the Rishi to give him that Garland. Knowing that Daksh was a good person, Durvasa gave the garland to him.
But Daksh casually kept the garland on his bed and went about doing his earthly instinctive work. Due to this insulting behaviour of Daksh for the divine garland, he developed a negative feeling for Shiva and Sati(Aadi Shakti).
Source - Devi puran
Instagram link👇
https://t.co/papGLZvcaI
More from Life
1/ Some initial thoughts on personal moats:
Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.
Characteristics of a personal moat below:
2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.
As Andrew Chen noted:
3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized
Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than
4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.
After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.
5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.
In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.
Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.
Characteristics of a personal moat below:
I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests https://t.co/bB3k1YcH5b
2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.
As Andrew Chen noted:
People talk about \u201cpassive income\u201d a lot but not about \u201cpassive social capital\u201d or \u201cpassive networking\u201d or \u201cpassive knowledge gaining\u201d but that\u2019s what you can architect if you have a thing and it grows over time without intensive constant effort to sustain it
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) November 22, 2018
3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized
Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than
Things that look like moats but likely aren\u2019t or may fade:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
- Proprietary networks
- Being something other than one of the best at any tournament style-game
- Many "awards"
- Twitter followers or general reach without "respect"
- Anything that depends on information asymmetry https://t.co/abjxesVIh9
4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.
After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.
5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.
In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
Facebook originally a CIA program called "LifeLog".
LifeLog, via DARPA, terminated on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook was launched on Feb 4th, 2004.
Many of the LifeLog team became execs at FB.
Zuckerberg is a figurehead.
CIA allowed Cambridge to help Trump win
https://t.co/enzOXDCogV
Pentagon Kills LifeLog
LifeLog, via DARPA, terminated on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook was launched on Feb 4th, 2004.
Many of the LifeLog team became execs at FB.
Zuckerberg is a figurehead.
CIA allowed Cambridge to help Trump win
https://t.co/enzOXDCogV
Project: Lifelog
— Robert Horan (@Robby12692) December 13, 2018
Started by DARPA in 1999, the goal of Lifelog was to create a database on civilians without their knowledge, and track everything they do.
The project "ended" on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook began the exact same day.
The CIA funneled tens of millions into Facebook. pic.twitter.com/r7hwF0v9kh
Pentagon Kills LifeLog