#HINDCOPPER
ALL THE HINDCOPPER LOVERS STOCK IS GETTING READY FOR 210++ LEVELS
#ELLIOTTWAVE

More from MD&ABN STOCKS TRADING IDEAS
More from Hindcopper
Once close above 158 more momentum. Till then ping pong to continue
Hindcopper Update 25.07.2021
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) July 25, 2021
Stock has given breakout from falling trendline with volume which is important signal.
Above 151 a good trend change signal.
Stock can do 200-212 once starts trading above 158+
SL 135. View gets negated below 135#Hindcopper #Bullish pic.twitter.com/82q9NKSqmd
Longs Alert take care. Stock looks weak to me below 135.
#hindcopper https://t.co/hnXBWmcPEX

Hindcopper unable to cross 158 and required bullish momentum missing.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 9, 2021
Closing below 135 is weak signal.
Would like to wait n watch before commenting further on this stock.
Dosc: Holding "NO Longs" in this stock. https://t.co/qGAnigXBB7
#TataSteel 1483/1367 #JSWSteel 733/664 #SAIL 128/112 #Nalco 86/71 https://t.co/ENmCqITEmA

Could be time to book out of large cap IT, if #Dxy continues to correct, fund flow could again chase risky assets #Banks #metals #midnsmall caps.
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) August 23, 2021
Just my observation.
Below todays lows on small cap index could be game over for now. But looks like a ABC corrective done
#Hindcopper 150/109 #Hindalco 450/399 #Vedl 307/260 #Hindustanzinc 345/293

#GPIL 1420/1084 #Sardaenergy 747 / 614 #JindalPowerSteel 428/357

You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x