Categories For later read
The stuff this adaptation considers extraneous is baffling.
The acting is great. Cinematography, effects, direction, top notch.
But the script is just killing me.
9/10 of Nick's story so far was cut. Not exaggerating.
No jail, no sherriff, no sheriff's wife, no inmates. Pfft.
They took shears to it?
— Darren Eshenour (@desh182) January 13, 2021
... no Sue, no Lucy. Most of the Ad Hoc committee is missing.
The role of Ray (Ralph) has been scaled back a ton.
What is going on here?
My gut tells me we're not going to see Dayna or the Judge, either. :/
1. Two uncles in the Victorian Order(knighthood) and daddy was a Member of Parliament for 3 decades.
5. Alex Wilkinson liked to portray himself as an "everyman" and appealed to them with his posts.
— The Rose Knows (@WhiteRoseAFA) December 2, 2020
The truth is he went to the school of the British aristocracy, Eton. He moved between two continents at will, like all average Joes. pic.twitter.com/dhhdOTp6MX
2. His uncle was Sir William Henry Nairn Wilkinson. He gets the Sir title becaude he waa knighted.
https://t.co/uXhegQZVvV
3. His uncle Richard Wilkinson is a Commander of the Victorian Order and former chair of the Board of Governors for the University of Winchester.
https://t.co/5Kln0fnp4Q
4. His father was John Arbuthnot Du Cane Wilkinson; a Conservative Member of Parliament from 1970-1974 and 1979-2004.
5. John's obituary mentions Alex. His main claims to fame were causing trouble within his own party by being further right than most other Conservatives.
"Du Cane" was the pen name Alex used at
I have asked you for citations to support your assertions and to explain the relevance of some of your assertions, both of which you have demonstrated incapable of doing.
Maybe you are just incapable?
...and @heatherpeno blocks conceding and demonstrating that she cannot support her assertions or explain the relevance of some of her assertions to the original conversation (https://t.co/BzO0Xu2kGG). Her loss.
Paternal legal surrender is not yet a thing in any jurisdiction I am aware of but the female equivalents are legal (though not all of them are legal everywhere): abortion, baby Moses laws, unilateral adoption, etc.
— Michael Stretton, III, Rosa Ferreum (\u9435\u7470) (@MSS3RosaFerreum) February 3, 2020
Do you have a citation to the contrary?
1/?
On Monday, the Church of England Evangelical Council (CEEC) released a video on racism.
2.
Note - the CEEC is a distinctive evangelical pressure group within the C of E. It is independent of the Anglican hierarchy (although it has a couple of bishops among its members), so its actions and decisions have nothing to do with Welby.
3.
You can watch the video here:
https://t.co/5FwIpErBSM
My rant is not about the video itself; nor about the people who feature in it, who all seem perfectly decent.
Nonetheless, there are two rather large elephants in the room.
4.
This is the 1st:
To the best of my knowledge, CEEC said precisely nothing about racism when one specific form of racism - antisemitism - was a national issue for 5 years, and formed part of the backdrop to 2 successive General Elections.
Does racism against Jews not count?
5.
So the Premier's press secretary wouldn't acknowledge "texts, emails or phone messages" from the media for several days. This is her job. She's a press secretary. Is she just not doing her job, or is she also on a tropical vacation? \U0001f914#AbLeg #abpoli #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/q0evfu9tPU
— UCP Director of Sandwiches (@sjcalgary) January 1, 2021
Seems conservatives have an overdeveloped sense of entitlement.
How does it feel to the average Albertan to be considered second class? Apparently UCP, CPC and other conservatives across Canada are exempt from COVID public health orders.
I wonder if that means anti maskers are first class citizens? What about church pastors and parishioners? Are they first class status too?
But teachers, physicians, police, first responders, grocery workers, and every other Albertan is considered second class.
We don’t get exemptions to avoid public health orders.
What kind of government flouts law and order?
This is not explained by the confused and poorly informed “freedom” focussed Q’Anon and the fanatical Evangelical Christian’s who evidently can’t manage to worship at home.
These are fully informed political aids and politicians. Refusing to be limited by public health orders.
\U0001f4a5ViCToRy\U0001f4a5iS OuRS \U0001f4a5.......................................................\U0001f4a5
— SPACEX (@SPACEX25587506) December 13, 2020
\U0001f4a5..............................................................................\U0001f4a5... ...... .........\u267e pic.twitter.com/r8L32gnZmh
https://t.co/LEY7ZuSj0i
https://t.co/aFNhQhVP6Q
https://t.co/9Ai0QXAIcg
https://t.co/ekTV5auW6s