Categories For later read
Fish was never a deal breaker. Level playing field was
— Mujtaba Rahman (@Mij_Europe) December 14, 2020
But LPF now more likely to come together after @EU_Commission move (on trade test for unlocking remedial measures & scope of arbitration over remedial measures)
If it does, expect deal on \U0001f420\U0001f421 too
It is the same "I move in principle you move in detail" shift we saw with the Northern Ireland protocol last year, when no PM could accept a border between GB and NI suddenly did, just as recently no PM would accept tariffs for divergence and seems to have done.
So, are we at deal yet? No, and it remains far from certain, but better than the gloom of Saturday. I still think the PM wants his ideal where everyone is happy, still hopes if only he can speak to Macron and Merkel he could get it, still to decide.
Second, I still maintain that Johnson has not made a decision here. Some days he leans towards Deal, sometimes towards No Deal
— Jon Worth (@jonworth) December 14, 2020
He has been stuck for weeks, and still is. He\u2019d ideally just not decide *anything*
And even if there is a deal it is now too late for either business to adjust to it, or the EU to ratify it according to normal procedure. In both cases you'd think we'd need an extension, but there is a big shrug on this whole question. Nobody knows.
And so, yet again on Brexit, we wait. In particular, those who actually do the trade, the businesses we rely on, are forced to wait for a formal outcome while preparing as best they can. Let's see what happens.
My latest (as ever, I don't write headlines).
— Steven Barrett (@SBarrettBar) December 10, 2020
It's important people try to explain what sovereignty is and why we are where we are. If you like elephants, read my explanation.https://t.co/mhh7Sjk6Er
Very large numbers of international treaties require the UK to make, or not make, law. The UN Treaty requires us to impose sanctions. The Antarctic Treaty requires us to prohibit unlicensed operators organising tours to Antarctica. GATT restricts our ability to set tariffs.
appears to think that such provisions do not infringe his definition of “sovereignty”, but he fails to explain why not.
He asserts, without explaining why, that a level playing field term would infringe “sovereignty”. But the LPF terms being discussed simply set out actions that the EU is able to take if the UK legislates (or does not legislate) in certain ways.
Why is that different in legal principle from WTO rules that (for example) allow other states to impose high tariffs on our widget industry if we exercise our sovereign freedom to pass laws that exempt widget-making from UK tax?
to the question of larping, yes, most everything starts in the realm of pretense and fantasy but some things get realized, I would have thought people would have learned by now that things can be both absurd and sinister
— John Ganz (@lionel_trolling) January 7, 2021
we often talk about the overthrow of reconstruction as a singular organized effort, but it should be understood as something more disparate and fractured, with success tied less to martial superiority than the indifference of authorities to intimidation and violence.
a group of guys — maybe the owner of the general store, and the sheriff and some farmers who fought in the war — gets together to gripe and complain and plot a little mischief. they put on masks and grab guns and go beat up a black sharecropper or local clerk or whatever...
everyone knows who did it. but there’s no one to stop them. the army, if it’s even in the state, is tens or hundreds of miles away. and mustering a militia may risk open conflict. the guys realize they can do this and getaway with it. so they do it again.
maybe they have a few more people with them this time. maybe they escalate, not just beating up local blacks and their white allies but killing a few.
My letter to Democratic Leader Schumer.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) January 17, 2021
The Senate should vote to dismiss the article of impeachment once it is received in the Senate. We will be delaying indefinitely, if not forever, the healing of this great Nation if we do otherwise. pic.twitter.com/fjVcf7iVPf
1) "But now, in your first act as Majority Leader, rather than begin the national healing that the country so desperately yearns for, you seek vengeance and political retaliation instead."
Trump incited an attack on the Capitol, on Congress, and on a free & fair election.
Trump has yet to concede, to apologize, or to admit he was lying about the outcome of the election. He has done nothing that demonstrates he does not continue to present a danger to our nation.
Trump's supporters continue to conspire to overthrow the government--with Trump's implicit, and quite possibly explicit--support. At this very moment, over 20,000 troops are stationed in our nation's capital to ensure the inauguration of President-Elect Biden can be completed.
It is not "vengeance" or "political retaliation" to insist a man that has fomented and continues to inspire a violent insurrection against the government is unfit ever to hold office again.
This is, in fact, a bare minimum protection for our country against future harm by Trump.
-Continuing Resolution (CR) is a mechanism to address a budgetary “gap”
Under @senatemajldr (not) awesome leadership CRs have become the norm, which is maddening because that’s NOT what CRs are meant for
-pocket veto
-veto
-President versus Congress
#Evergreen
— File411 (@File411) December 25, 2020
did you think I was randomly screaming (sometimes I do) but this thread, I walked you through some of the programs which would run out of Funding
You let me know if @realDonaldTrump isn\u2018t a petulant selfish sociopath
He does not give 1 F...https://t.co/mgLnAvrovs
Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution
-any Bill shall not be returned by the President within 10 Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment
Sorry here’s the link - Article 1, Section 7 of our Constitution (sometimes referred to as the presentment clause)
One could infer “pocket veto” +/- 2 days Jan 4th, 5th, or 6th...
https://t.co/8xrbnNLn1V
My educated guess is Trump knows
“might” (operative word) be his “trust the plan” screwing McConnell Senate GOP & nearly ALL Americans
-though lacking a signature and formal objections
-does not become law
-Pocket vetoes are not subject to the congressional veto override process
And here‘s WHY - it is literally the last sentence:
“...unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law”
the massive bill was flown down to FL yesterday so the 10 day clock started yesterday...
https://t.co/8xrbnNLn1V
I say this on my tours, we 'know' very little. In fact, we know nothing. I don't know is honest!! It's humble, and its real.
In Egypt there's too much to know, so 'we don't know' is the truest statement there is. https://t.co/IajqsQGdJ8
Another reminder to relax and trust the journey. Become comfortable saying "I don't know."
— \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8I Support Our Military & Law Enforcement\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 (@TheWiseOwl_AZ) December 11, 2020
https://t.co/jXtMo6tFMK
https://t.co/6d9OC6NhPi
https://t.co/KxfexudiGL
https://t.co/tvi7MusmEd
Spatial metaphors for human systems
for @threadapalooza
Spatial metaphors for human systems.
— Conor White-Sullivan \U000100cf\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 (@Conaw) December 18, 2020
1/ Okay, let's start with BRIDGES!
(first that came to mind)
This is a common human system metaphor, people talking about bridging between cultures or perspectives, or communities/individuals.
2/ In fact it's the metaphor @vgr used in the prompt he gave me for @threadapalooza last year, in a thread I never
1 like = 1 opinion on "Bridging subcultures that don\u2019t quite harmonize"
— Malcolm is back by the \U0001f30ecean! (@Malcolm_Ocean) December 16, 2019
(It's not quite a natural category for me but it's what vgr gave me and I like a challenge! good way to draw out some implicit opinions. comment if you have more specific Qs) https://t.co/eAn0MhwZfX
3/ The bridge metaphor is kind of an obvious one: forging some kind of translation connection between two different perspectives.
It's a kinda limited connection though. In fact, the word "translation", in the context of mathematics, means "to move across" which matches bridge
4/ So a bridge, as a metaphor, is a way to move one perspective across to another. But let's contrast that with the metaphor of "depth perception", where the two perspectives are integrated into a larger whole.
Way harder than bridging, & more
Your two eyes have different perspectives and thus contradict each other constantly about what's closer and what's on what side of what...
— Malcolm is back by the \U0001f30ecean! (@Malcolm_Ocean) May 11, 2020
...and\u2014usually\u2014rather than wasting energy on an argument over which 2D view is right, the brain integrates them into DEPTH PERCEPTION \U0001f92f pic.twitter.com/k9w9t8pqxE