More from RealRLD
#PeakBlogging2011 ) years ago and this Groundhog post from @DavidGolemXIV @scientificecon @jbhearn @DavidGolemXIV @financialeyes @JoeBlob20 @wiki_ballot @GrubStreetJorno @Pathos14658352 @Lloyd__Evans There is no #CovidCrisis #ClimateCrisis
#GFCPt2
https://t.co/QGutbtW0Ev https://t.co/AwvmN9AWqu
https://t.co/XBaqI4O7X8 @RNW_MITCHELL
RBS: The Hillsborough of British Business
https://t.co/9F89jQDZV6 #SpankTheBanker
https://t.co/bOAwzaKCEM
#GFCPt2
https://t.co/QGutbtW0Ev https://t.co/AwvmN9AWqu
https://t.co/XBaqI4O7X8 @RNW_MITCHELL
Are you all ready for the Final Chapter - The Ending ? https://t.co/uF5HXRMPQp
— NEIL MITCHELL (@RNW_MITCHELL) December 22, 2020
RBS: The Hillsborough of British Business
https://t.co/9F89jQDZV6 #SpankTheBanker
https://t.co/bOAwzaKCEM
More from Culture
.@bellingcat's attempt in their new book, published by
@BloomsburyBooks, to coverup the @OPCW #Douma controversy, promote US and UK gov. war narratives, and whitewash fraudulent conduct within the OPCW, is an exercise in deception through omission @marydejevsky @freddiesayers
1) 2000 words are devoted to the OPCW controversy regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in #Douma, Syria in 2018 but critical material is omitted from the book. Reading it, one would never know the following:
2) That the controversy started when the original interim report, drafted and agreed by Douma inspection team members, was secretly modified by an unknown OPCW person who had manipulated the findings to suggest an attack had occurred. https://t.co/QtAAyH9WyX… @RobertF40396660
3) This act of attempted deception was only derailed because an inspector discovered the secret changes. The manipulations were reported by @ClarkeMicah
and can be readily observed in documents now available https://t.co/2BUNlD8ZUv….
4) .@bellingcat's book also makes no mention of the @couragefoundation panel, attended by the @opcw's first Director General, Jose Bustani, at which an OPCW official detailed key procedural irregularities and scientific flaws with the Final Douma Report:
@BloomsburyBooks, to coverup the @OPCW #Douma controversy, promote US and UK gov. war narratives, and whitewash fraudulent conduct within the OPCW, is an exercise in deception through omission @marydejevsky @freddiesayers
In response to @marydejevsky seemingly bad faith questions about Bellingcat on @unherd I've written a response providing details of where Bellingcat came from, and why it is like it is https://t.co/5rCsSwpcAm
— Eliot Higgins (@EliotHiggins) February 15, 2021
1) 2000 words are devoted to the OPCW controversy regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in #Douma, Syria in 2018 but critical material is omitted from the book. Reading it, one would never know the following:
2) That the controversy started when the original interim report, drafted and agreed by Douma inspection team members, was secretly modified by an unknown OPCW person who had manipulated the findings to suggest an attack had occurred. https://t.co/QtAAyH9WyX… @RobertF40396660
3) This act of attempted deception was only derailed because an inspector discovered the secret changes. The manipulations were reported by @ClarkeMicah
and can be readily observed in documents now available https://t.co/2BUNlD8ZUv….
4) .@bellingcat's book also makes no mention of the @couragefoundation panel, attended by the @opcw's first Director General, Jose Bustani, at which an OPCW official detailed key procedural irregularities and scientific flaws with the Final Douma Report: