They find the property, do all the work, hire the management company and take fees. They often co-sign debt and always secure the financing.
A THREAD on how most real estate folks structure deals with outside investors.
Most people utilize the "preferred equity" structure when they raise money from outside investors. They "syndicate" deals.
Here's the basics:
They find the property, do all the work, hire the management company and take fees. They often co-sign debt and always secure the financing.
They don't co-sign debt. They simply read reports and ask the sponsors questions and cash checks every month (if the deal is going well).
"Preferred equity" belongs to the LPs. Cash talks, so this is a higher class of shares. They are first in the "capital stack" behind the debt (bank loan).
"Common equity" belongs to the sponsor. They are generally last in the capital stack.
That means the GP has skin in the game. His 10% co-invest makes him both an LP and a GP.
That means they get paid first. The pref signals how much. Its generally 6-12%. That means the LP is entitled to the first 6-12% of profit the project generates.
New development, or high risk value add projects, generally warrant lower prefs and higher "promotes"
Its a percentage of profits the sponsor gets AFTER the LPs get their preferred return on their cash.
This ranges from 20% to 50%. It can change based on checkpoints, or "waterfall".
Because every day your LP capital isn't returned its accumulating "preferred returns" that you owe to the LP. The only way to stop it is to return it.
There are often additional waterfalls. 80/20 after an 8 pref and 50/50 after a 20% "hurdle".
A hurdle is a return percentage you need to hit to get into the next level of promote.
Internal Rate of Return.
When the deal is done, and my capital is back, what percent return have I earned?
Sponsors hate it because there are so many other factors that are more important to the health of the deal.
How long of a time frame are we on? These deals aren't liquid. LPs can't just ask for their money back.
Sponsors lay out the investment timeline and let everyone know how long this thing is expected to go.
Acquisition fees can be anywhere from 1-5%.
AUM fees are generally .5-2%.
The market sets these fees (as well as the pref and promote). If you have a track record, more fees.
I buy storage facilities so lets say we have a $1MM operational facility already at 90% occupancy.
Its (relatively) low risk so lets say the structure is 7 pref and 50% promote thereafter. No waterfalls.
We raise 300k from outside LPs to close out the deal. No co-invest to keep the math simple.
Starting on day 1 we owe the LPs a 7% annual rate (pref) on the $300k.
I would get paid $50k on day one to buy the deal and get it under ownership.
To keep the math simple we aren't building this in, but keep it in mind.
The 1% AUM fee would be $3,000 a year on the $300k.
That goes to the sponsor.
Our cash on cash would be around 15% or higher if we can secure Interest Only debt (not paying principle for the first period of time).
That means on day one I'm hitting the hurdle and getting paid
But we have $45k in cashflow, or $24k after the pref.
That money is split 50/50 between the GP and the LPs because we have a 50% promote.
Yr 1 the LPs get $21k+$12k for $33k. 11% IRR pace.
Yr 2 cashflow is even higher, $45k+$30k for $75k.
LPs are owed $21k as their pref and we have more to split up between the sponsor and LPs. LPs get another $27k and Sponsors get $27k.
Lets do a sale first. Our property might be worth a 7 cap on the new NOI, or $1.428MM. Lets say $1.5 for simple math.
We sell it for $1.5M at the 24 month mark. Home run deal.
Bank gets their $700k back first.
LPs get their $300k back next.
They've already been getting their pref from day 1 so we don't have a preferred return to "catch up" when we sell. So its 50/50 from here.
In 24 months the LPs made $81k in cashflow (or 13.5% per year).
That means the targeted cash yield on the deal should have been around 13.5% if the sponsors projections were correct. Cash yield doesn't account for sale, only ops.
A $331k total profit. In 2 yrs.
IRR: 55.16%
Equity Multiple: 2.1x
Add it to your resume, pay a bunch of taxes, and do a bigger deal!
Instead of selling the property for $1.5MM and paying a bunch of taxes and being stuck with $500k in capital that is earning nothing and needs re-deployed, lets hold the asset and put more debt on it.
They get the property appraised for $1.5MM, look at the debt service coverage ratio, and agree to lend 75% of the new value.
That means you can take $1,125,000 in new debt.
Bank gets paid $700k (original debt is cleared).
LPs get paid $300k (original investment, pref is no longer accruing)
You have $125k left over. Sponsor gets 50%. LPs get 50%.
EVERYTHING FROM HERE IS BUTTER.
The property still cashflows. You didn't pay a bunch of taxes. You still got LPs their money back and they're ready to do another deal with you.
You as the sponsor, now own 50% of a building you put $0 into.
I'm not a pro at this. Looking forward to getting corrected where I missed something.
There are thousands of ways to do this and terms and factors I didn't mention.
I just wish I could have read something like this a year ago when I first started on ReTwit.
https://t.co/h4fybmycuK
I use @GroundbreakerCo to manage my LPs. Same thing as Juniper Square except 1/5 the cost. Love it.
https://t.co/FEt1sBoSWS
More from Nick Huber
More from Business
Facebook originally a CIA program called "LifeLog".
LifeLog, via DARPA, terminated on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook was launched on Feb 4th, 2004.
Many of the LifeLog team became execs at FB.
Zuckerberg is a figurehead.
CIA allowed Cambridge to help Trump win
https://t.co/enzOXDCogV
Pentagon Kills LifeLog
LifeLog, via DARPA, terminated on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook was launched on Feb 4th, 2004.
Many of the LifeLog team became execs at FB.
Zuckerberg is a figurehead.
CIA allowed Cambridge to help Trump win
https://t.co/enzOXDCogV
Project: Lifelog
— Robert Horan (@Robby12692) December 13, 2018
Started by DARPA in 1999, the goal of Lifelog was to create a database on civilians without their knowledge, and track everything they do.
The project "ended" on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook began the exact same day.
The CIA funneled tens of millions into Facebook. pic.twitter.com/r7hwF0v9kh
Pentagon Kills LifeLog
The Mother of All Squeezes
How Volkswagen went from being on the brink of bankruptcy to the most valuable company in the world in two days
/THREAD/
1/ At the peak of the 2008 financial crisis, Volkswagen was considered a very likely candidate for bankruptcy.
Heavily indebted and already financially struggling before 2008, with car sales expected to plummet due to the ongoing global crisis.
2/ With GM and Chrysler filing for bankruptcy in 2009, shorting the VW stock would seem a safe bet.
If you are not familiar with stock shorts and short squeezes check my thread
3/ On October 26, 2008, Porsche announced it had increased its stake at VW from 30% to 74%.
This was a surprise to many who were led to believe that Porsche wasn't planning a takeover of VW, based on the company's announcements.
4/ Before the announcement, the short interest was approximately 13% of the outstanding shares, a number considered relatively low.
Porsche had a 30% stake, the Lower Saxony government fund held 20% of the shares, and another 5% was held by index funds.
How Volkswagen went from being on the brink of bankruptcy to the most valuable company in the world in two days
/THREAD/
1/ At the peak of the 2008 financial crisis, Volkswagen was considered a very likely candidate for bankruptcy.
Heavily indebted and already financially struggling before 2008, with car sales expected to plummet due to the ongoing global crisis.
2/ With GM and Chrysler filing for bankruptcy in 2009, shorting the VW stock would seem a safe bet.
If you are not familiar with stock shorts and short squeezes check my thread
Shorts, Squeezes, and Betting Against Stocks
— Kostas on FIRE \U0001f525 (@itsKostasOnFIRE) January 27, 2021
What is short selling, how is it used and why is it risky?
/THREAD/ pic.twitter.com/PyDd208hFe
3/ On October 26, 2008, Porsche announced it had increased its stake at VW from 30% to 74%.
This was a surprise to many who were led to believe that Porsche wasn't planning a takeover of VW, based on the company's announcements.
4/ Before the announcement, the short interest was approximately 13% of the outstanding shares, a number considered relatively low.
Porsche had a 30% stake, the Lower Saxony government fund held 20% of the shares, and another 5% was held by index funds.
So I'd recommend reading this thread from Dave, but I thought about some of these policies, and how they fit into the whole, a lot, and want to offer a different interpretation.
I think California is world leading on progressivism that doesn't ask anyone to give anything up, or accept any major change, right now.
That's what I mean by symbolically progressive, operationally conservative.
Take the 100% renewable energy standard. As @leahstokes has written, these policies often fail in practice. I note our leadership on renewable energy in the piece, but the kind of politics we see on housing and transportation are going foil that if they don't change.
Creating a statewide consumer financial protection agency is great! But again, you're not asking most voters to give anything up or accept any actual changes.
I don't see that as balancing the scales on, say, high-speed rail.
CA is willing to vote for higher taxes, new agencies, etc. It was impressive when LA passed Measure H, a new sales tax to fund homeless shelters. And depressing to watch those same communities pour into the streets to protest shelters being placed near them. That's the rub.
It's very in vogue to bash California and this doesn't even reach to some things that deserve scorn, like the continuing control of the Western States Petroleum Association and the state Chamber of Commerce in policymaking. And yet-https://t.co/vHZ6GM7QF8
— David Dayen (@ddayen) February 11, 2021
I think California is world leading on progressivism that doesn't ask anyone to give anything up, or accept any major change, right now.
That's what I mean by symbolically progressive, operationally conservative.
Take the 100% renewable energy standard. As @leahstokes has written, these policies often fail in practice. I note our leadership on renewable energy in the piece, but the kind of politics we see on housing and transportation are going foil that if they don't change.
Creating a statewide consumer financial protection agency is great! But again, you're not asking most voters to give anything up or accept any actual changes.
I don't see that as balancing the scales on, say, high-speed rail.
CA is willing to vote for higher taxes, new agencies, etc. It was impressive when LA passed Measure H, a new sales tax to fund homeless shelters. And depressing to watch those same communities pour into the streets to protest shelters being placed near them. That's the rub.
You May Also Like
Took me 5 years to get the best Chartink scanners for Stock Market, but you’ll get it in 5 mminutes here ⏰
Do Share the above tweet 👆
These are going to be very simple yet effective pure price action based scanners, no fancy indicators nothing - hope you liked it.
https://t.co/JU0MJIbpRV
52 Week High
One of the classic scanners very you will get strong stocks to Bet on.
https://t.co/V69th0jwBr
Hourly Breakout
This scanner will give you short term bet breakouts like hourly or 2Hr breakout
Volume shocker
Volume spurt in a stock with massive X times
Do Share the above tweet 👆
These are going to be very simple yet effective pure price action based scanners, no fancy indicators nothing - hope you liked it.
https://t.co/JU0MJIbpRV
52 Week High
One of the classic scanners very you will get strong stocks to Bet on.
https://t.co/V69th0jwBr
Hourly Breakout
This scanner will give you short term bet breakouts like hourly or 2Hr breakout
Volume shocker
Volume spurt in a stock with massive X times