#ApolloHospital Daily CMP 4820
Making a Symmetrical triangle pattern.
Breakout above 4940.
Plan Your Trade
#MasterInOne
More from VJ
More from Apollohospitals
On track to 5850...
As per traditional chart analysis, the breakout from the flag can extend by a distance of the flagpole which gives us the price objective of 5850 or thereabouts.
Let's see what happens!
#ApolloHospital https://t.co/jHgjR2WThe
As per traditional chart analysis, the breakout from the flag can extend by a distance of the flagpole which gives us the price objective of 5850 or thereabouts.
Let's see what happens!
#ApolloHospital https://t.co/jHgjR2WThe
Looks like a Flag to me...
— Hardik Upadhyay, CMT. (@tradingwithdyr) August 30, 2021
A flag pattern is a continuation pattern that suggests a short-term consolidation in opposite direction preceding a strong move.
A breakout above 4850 could have a rapid movement!#ApolloHospitals pic.twitter.com/q7g4enQjRY
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x