I’ve Tweeted for 120 days in a row.

And added +22K followers without spending $10,000 on Ghoastwritters.

My secret: This list of 8 Hidden Twitter Metrics (and how you can use them to grow like crazy):

Before we dive in...

1. What you’re about to learn is priceless—Put it to work.

2. I've used these secrets to get 8,396 followers in 28 days.

Let's GO 👇
1/ Consistency Streak (CS)

Twitter needs a consistent flow of content.

The avg lifetime of a tweet is ONLY 30 mins.

Give it consistency & you'll get reach & followers in return.

→ Schedule your tweets and have 1 EVERY single day.
2/ Activities per week (APW)

Just like in a videogame, every time you do an activity:

• Like
• DM
• Reply
• Retweet

Twitter assigns you an activity point for these.

→ Higher APW = Higher chances of Twitter sharing your content.
3/ Comments per tweet (CPT)

How many replies do you get on your Tweet(s)?

Why it's important?

• CPT for each tweet = Reach of your tweet

• Your Avg CPT = Initial reach of your tweets/replies.

→ Ask more questions in your Tweets. https://t.co/T2iMGuHBxP
4/ Retweets per tweet (RPT)

This is how many retweets you get on your Tweet(s).

This is all about the virality of your content.

My advice:

• Use Emotions
• State benefits
• Include numbers https://t.co/SUa63sxTJb
5/Self retweets per tweet (sRPT)

Be careful with this one!

Retweeting your own tweets might give you extra reach in the short term.

In the long run, however, this will hurt you.

→ Limit your self-retweets to 25% of your tweets
6/ Engaged people per week (ePPW)

Twitter is a social platform, it promotes engagement.

Keep people engaged, and the algorithm will:

• Favor your content
• Push it to new audiences

→ Be interesting; Use your own contrarian/hot takes.
7/ Two-way engagements per week (tEPW)

Two-way engagements are powerful in real life & on Twitter.

Here's how it works:

• You engage with a user
• They engage back with your content
•You GROW 🚀

→ Build genuine relationships with others.
8/ Profile Quality and Virality (PQV):

I've saved the best for last!

This secret metric is an avg of your metrics (last 28 days).

PQV= CS + APW + CPT + RPT + sRPT+ ePPW (28 day avg)

→ Stay consistent for 28 days & watch your reach explode.
TLDR; 8 Hidden Twitter Metrics:

Consistency Streak (CS)
Retweets per tweet (RPT)
Activities per week (APW)
Comments per tweet (CPT)
Self retweets per tweet (sRPT)
Profile Quality and Virality (PQV)
Engaged people per week (ePPW)
Two-way engagements per week (tEPW)
If you enjoyed this thread:

• Follow me @albadawee on my journey from 0 to $1M
• Like/Comment/ RT to help your friends up thier Twitter game https://t.co/JxIJixmLZL

More from All

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?