You can launch your own Airbnb for $500.

Or Tinder for $450... and Uber for $2,000

"App clones" are popping up everywhere.

Here's why the "app clone" market is insane:
🧵

Imagine you have an idea that is Uber for X or Airbnb for Y.

Now you want to build it, but aren't technical.

You can:
A) Pay a freelancer or dev shop $15,000+
B) Find a technical co-founder
C) Spend 2+ learning how to code
D) Use an app clone
Thats why companies like AppDupe are getting 100,000 visitors a month.

They build "clones" of the most popular sites and give you a white-labeled solution.

Their sell to founders is...
- Launch quickly
- In-house customization
- Save $ on development

But here's the problem...
You might get sold a car, but leave with a horse.

There are horror stories of people getting:
- Nonfunctional code
- Not owning the proper rights
- Being drastically upsold to customize

If you don't know anything about dev, you won't know if you're getting a car or a horse.
Let's weigh the pros and cons:

Pros:
- Quick launch
- Fast market validation
- It's cheap

Cons:
- Not a code base you want to build from
- Maintenance is questionable
- You can get scammed
There are also really cool companies who started as an app clone.

If I were to launch something like Tinder for Dogs, I would use 100% use one.

But you know what the better route is?
Learn a no code tool, then buy a theme.

You can buy an Airbnb theme for $69 on Wordpress.

Change the messaging and branding yourself.

Get market validation.

And if you get traction... you can get fundraising to build the real thing.
Thanks for reading!

Follow @Adam_Ha_Yes and I'll launch Tinder for dogs as an app clone 😂
TLDR:

- App clones are cheap ways to validate ideas
- You can get ripped off, so be careful
- Learn no code tools to empower you to test on your own

More from All

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?

You May Also Like

The YouTube algorithm that I helped build in 2011 still recommends the flat earth theory by the *hundreds of millions*. This investigation by @RawStory shows some of the real-life consequences of this badly designed AI.


This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/


A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/

https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/

https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/