We are always looking for ways to make things better, more intuitive, & more helpful at Nextstrain! Some of you may have already noticed that we recently added a bunch of great new features - but in case you didn't, let's explore them!

1/11

First, if you're a regular user you'll remember the fun of extra-long legends even when zoomed in...

Now, the legend will only show what's visible on the map, making it much more useful!

(Works with colourings like genotype, too!)

2/11
When using Nextstrain we often want to examine 2 things at once - until now that was sometimes difficult!

Now it's a little easier - you can change the tip-labels from the default 'strain', so that you can combine colouring & tip labels to show different things!

3/11
With the recent type-to-filter function it's easier than ever to narrow down to just the sequences you want - but you're often still very far away!

A new 'Zoom to Selected' button will take you right in close to exactly what you're interested in looking at!

4/11
If you commonly download trees from Nextstrain you'll be happy to learn we've improved how this works!

Downloaded trees now reflect the subtree visible & you can now download annotated Nexus format that works in FigTree! (Note the view is 'upside down' between the 2 pics!)

5/11
Use drag-&-drop metadata to add extra info to builds? We've updated this too!

See the docs below for the details - it's now easier to see which tips added metadata & to add more types of data! (If you don't know about this feature - check it out!)

6/11

https://t.co/iseTa0qBrT
This is a little more subtle, but can still be very useful:

Previously, our frequency charts only had 1 point a month, sometimes leading to choppy graphs. We've improved this, so graphs are smoother & project less extremely into the future!

(Old on left, new on right!)

7/11
Finally, we've vastly improved how we can show off the many #SARSCoV2 Nextstrain builds people are maintaining, all over the world! See the new map (link below)!

Click to zoom in on regions with many builds & mouse-over dots to find out more!

8/11

https://t.co/wYGQV3gprx
It's easy to add your own build to this map! (& we'd love to have it up to help others find it!) Just submit a Pull Request to our https://t.co/5Q05vfE2gm repository - you can find how to do this at the link below!

9/11

https://t.co/nMrgr3jj2x
You can read about all of our latest updates in our Changelog (linked below).

We hope these updates make Nextstrain even more useful for your exploration, research, & analysis!

10/11

https://t.co/ykbEna5eYJ
These updates are thanks to great ideas & hard work from many Nextstrain team members, in particular from @hamesjadfield @wcassias @eliasharkins @trvrb & Jover Lee! 🙏🏻🚀

11/11

More from World

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?