THREAD. 1. We simply must stop seeing Freedom of Movement of People as a thing that causes mass immigration or that we must be scared of it. It avoids the need for “permanent immigration” & opens opportunities for British people and ensures our prof quals are recognised /...

2. FOM of people means it is as easy to take a job or live in Frankfurt as it is in Manchester or Bristol. FOM means you don’t need to immigrate permanently and keep your own nationality. /...
3. FOM of people does not mean scrapping passport control. (That’s Schengen and we’ve never been in it, but when you understand it properly, perhaps we should be) /...
4. FOM of people does not mean the government doesn’t know who is in the country. We have that data as passports are scanned and from flight advance passenger data and airline data. More recently also from health questionnaires. /...
5. FOM benefits younger workers coming to the UK and younger Brits going to other European cities to work. Nowadays you can often live and work in Europe even if you only speak English. Younger workers may go home after a few years /...
6. FOM lets independents, freelancers and remote office workers plus those who run their own business choose which country they live in. It brings in tax for the host country and spending so it’s good for them and good for British people wanting warm weather or variety. /...
7. FOM gives unemployed people the opportunity to look for work overseas when they can’t find work at home. That works both ways. Entitlement to benefits is very limited. /...
8. FOM lets people choose where they retire and gives them the right to move their pension and collect it anywhere. It’s good for the UK because healthcare is often cheaper. It’s good for host countries because retired people usually spend rather than save money. /...
9. FOM has always meant citizens should register their presence after 3 months and meet minimum income and healthcare insurance criteria before being allowed to stay. Some countries (the UK included!!) chose not to bother registering people like this. /...
10. Losing FOM harms the UK most of all because we lose a supply of workers to do jobs Brits don’t want to do, and we lose the freedom to choose any one of 32 countries in which to live/work/study/retire ourselves. Europeans only lose visa free work access to one country. /...
...please share and RT this thread to help people learn why having #FOM of people is nothing to fear and everything to celebrate.

Brexit treats people unfairly and unequally. (Remember people who can request or buy other passports are unaffected)

More from World

MISREPRESENTED CONTEXT

1. I am indeed disgusted with attempts to misrepresent and take out of context what I wrote on my blog yesterday.


2. Those who did that highlighted only one part of paragraph 12 which read: “Muslims have a right to be angry and to kill millions of French people for the massacres of the past.”

3. They stopped there and implied that I am promoting the massacre of the French.

4.If they had read d posting in its entirety & especially the subsequent sentence which read: “But by & large the Muslims hv not applied the “eye for an eye” law. Muslims don’t. The French shouldn’t. Instead the French should teach their people to respect other people’s feelings

5. Because of the spin and out of context presentation by those that picked up my posting, reports were made against me and I am accused of promoting violence etc… on Facebook and Twitter.
A few thoughts on this sad development 👇👇

20 academics criticizing an paper is fine; good science, really

10000+ hate mail for studying schools in Sweden is insane

Anonymous docs/ prof (hiding in faceless accts) on twitter smearing researchers is insane
[thread] https://t.co/QYldLD3WO0


In April 2020, @jflier and I saw this coming

We saw increasingly heated and personal attacks against scientists merely for having a range of views on COVID19 (PS there is no playbook/ right ans)

Tying science to naked politics was also bad idea, we

Yet, repeatedly that is what happened. Twitter 'experts' displayed an absolute intolerance to other views

Folks who disagreed weren't just wrong, they were malicious actors spreading "disinformation"

Really? Someone worked for 25 years as faculty to suddenly spread lies?

Disinformation has been so misused that it has lost meaning.

I recently saw an ID doc & lab researcher in the UK be accused of spreading "disinformation"

hahah, get outta here, you are trying to say "i disagree" but your keyboard is broken

Personal attacks have become so bad that I have seen a lab researcher accuse a doctor of wanting to engage in inappropriate relationships with patients due to diverging views on vaccine messaging

Seriously? It was a low point even for twitter

You May Also Like