A few thoughts on this sad development 👇👇

20 academics criticizing an paper is fine; good science, really

10000+ hate mail for studying schools in Sweden is insane

Anonymous docs/ prof (hiding in faceless accts) on twitter smearing researchers is insane
[thread] https://t.co/QYldLD3WO0

In April 2020, @jflier and I saw this coming

We saw increasingly heated and personal attacks against scientists merely for having a range of views on COVID19 (PS there is no playbook/ right ans)

Tying science to naked politics was also bad idea, we felt

https://t.co/NFB5z8naJn
Yet, repeatedly that is what happened. Twitter 'experts' displayed an absolute intolerance to other views

Folks who disagreed weren't just wrong, they were malicious actors spreading "disinformation"

Really? Someone worked for 25 years as faculty to suddenly spread lies?
Disinformation has been so misused that it has lost meaning.

I recently saw an ID doc & lab researcher in the UK be accused of spreading "disinformation"

hahah, get outta here, you are trying to say "i disagree" but your keyboard is broken
Personal attacks have become so bad that I have seen a lab researcher accuse a doctor of wanting to engage in inappropriate relationships with patients due to diverging views on vaccine messaging

Seriously? It was a low point even for twitter
I got my share of personal attacks for my view that after vaccination you can relax restrictions, which by the way, becomes more mainstream each week!

Here is my story
https://t.co/VLFJ1FSqtr
I have had actually professors engage a troll-account, run by an east coast academic physician, that took my photo and mocks me

But the strangest part is that they simultaneously claim that online harassment is a problem; go figure
I have witnessed academics so angry that they insult me for even talking to John Ioannidis, one of the worlds most cited researchers

They criticize my interview AND refuse to listen to it

haha, that's the spirit!

If you don't listen, it must be bad
https://t.co/2sMljrdOfA
The Swedish NEJM study was good; very good

And has helped change bad ideas about risk

The author deserves praise; It is a matter of fact, descriptive study, nothing more
Don't get me started on Great Barrington Declaration

The absolute low point in name-calling was the treatment of the authors

Ok, i get it, you disagree. Me too 👇👇

But if you think the authors or signatories are pro-death, then you are out of line

https://t.co/9KKW8P10zp
PS John Snow memo has the exact same limitations

GBD - how will you shield the vulnerable from virus?
JSM - what's your plan to shield the vulnerable from the harms of restrictions?

Both were lacking, and yet one side was brutalized
COVID19 has revealed that the academy failed to provide a place for discourse about trade-offs

I wrote about it here:
https://t.co/lOP6MCnTnm
I discussed with issue with many people on my pod. One discussion worth your time was Jacob Russell

https://t.co/4mV63wALii
This was a total disaster👇👇👇

I don't have the same take as Carl. My interpretation of Danish mask is in my column: https://t.co/q7F61AtUcT

But letting FB employees decide Carl H, Oxford Prof's view is false is insane
https://t.co/0UKqzPa5md

More from World

🧵 ⚡️ #Navalny, in handcuffs, expects his second verdict in one day NOW, about to be ready any minute now. He’s joking about cucumbers he pickles in his cell. I will translate his SECOND last address in one day but here is the previous trial coverage


Extracts from #Navalny last address #2 today: “Putin’s party is akin a swine devouring oil and gas dollars from a trough, & when poked & reminded that $ are for everyone, growls, “What about the WWII? What about veterans?!” The verdict is due any minute now. #FreeNavalny 👇🏼☝🏼

The judge is back and reads the verdict now.

“The politician criticized the participants in the [RT] video in support of the amendments to the Constitution, calling the presenters "corrupt lackeys", "traitors" and "people without conscience."

The judge says Navalny pleaded not guilty and called the persecution politicized.

You May Also Like

The chorus of this song uses the shlokas taken from Sundarkand of Ramayana.

It is a series of Sanskrit shlokas recited by Jambavant to Hanuman to remind Him of his true potential.

1. धीवर प्रसार शौर्य भरा: The brave persevering one, your bravery is taking you forward.


2. उतसारा स्थिरा घम्भीरा: The one who is leaping higher and higher, who is firm and stable and seriously determined.

3. ुग्रामा असामा शौर्या भावा: He is strong, and without an equal in the ability/mentality to fight

4. रौद्रमा नवा भीतिर्मा: His anger will cause new fears in his foes.

5.विजिटरीपुरु धीरधारा, कलोथरा शिखरा कठोरा: This is a complex expression seen only in Indic language poetry. The poet is stating that Shivudu is experiencing the intensity of climbing a tough peak, and likening

it to the feeling in a hard battle, when you see your enemy defeated, and blood flowing like a rivulet. This is classical Veera rasa.

6.कुलकु थारथिलीथा गम्भीरा, जाया विराट वीरा: His rough body itself is like a sharp weapon (because he is determined to win). Hail this complete

hero of the world.

7.विलयगागनथाला भिकारा, गरज्जद्धरा गारा: The hero is destructive in the air/sky as well (because he can leap at an enemy from a great height). He can defeat the enemy (simply) with his fearsome roar of war.