Promised to share my portfolio, so here it is.
None of this is investment advice, please do your own research. I may choose to exit, reduce or add anytime to these.
More from Tar ⚡
Case Study: Bharat Electronics Ltd
OPM: 23%
Free Float: <5%
QoQ continuous increase in ownership by institutions
ROE: ~20%
ROCE: ~28%
EV by EBITDA: 15
Leading developer of Indigenous Military Drones
Exports are prime focus for the company
D: Invested, not a recommendation
OPM: 23%
Free Float: <5%
QoQ continuous increase in ownership by institutions
ROE: ~20%
ROCE: ~28%
EV by EBITDA: 15
Leading developer of Indigenous Military Drones
Exports are prime focus for the company
D: Invested, not a recommendation
Lots of under owned stocks with robust financials within Defense Sector \U0001fa96\U0001f396\ufe0f
— Tar \u26a1 (@itsTarH) April 12, 2022
You don't even have to try looking very hard to find something interesting
Most of the indices are entering oversold territories
Take small cap index for example
Whenever Monthly RSI is below or around 40, the index bottoms out
We are getting there.
If I had 50% cash, I would have deployed some in beaten down stocks where earnings growth is intact. https://t.co/t5WwgH1V5o
Take small cap index for example
Whenever Monthly RSI is below or around 40, the index bottoms out
We are getting there.
If I had 50% cash, I would have deployed some in beaten down stocks where earnings growth is intact. https://t.co/t5WwgH1V5o
I have more than 50% cash but still worried if this is a good time. Will invest 20% by EoY
— Tamil Metaverse (@TamilMetaverse) June 21, 2022
More from Uvlearnings
The comment from renowned investor was in a lighter vein. You ought to listen to the tone. He was spot on in comparing the capability and scale of two businesses, as both started around the same time - one could scale up, whilst other couldn't. Let's not read too much into it 🙂
In an example of how deeply ingrained misogyny is in the Indian system, billionaire investor Rakesh Jhunjhunwala asked the management of Jubilant Pharmova: \u201cHow can we be lower than the lady? We have to beat her,\u201d in a slighting reference to @kiranshaw.
— Dr. Kailashnath Koppikar (@koppik) June 26, 2021
https://t.co/1dkZ9JMLLr
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
