For so long social media companies have been disguising themselves as a method of free speech to hide their true corporate nature. This is why they have avoided censoring @realDonaldTrump and others.

Social Media companies want us to see twitter/Facebook/Reddit/Instagram like a public-use bulletin board when they are really more analogous to the Target intercom system. This keeps the users from realizing they are generating content for corporations for free.
But, most importantly, when social media corporations disguise themselves as public-use bulletin boards they confuse the public into thinking first amendment protections should apply to user-generated content AND THEREFORE we should not regulate social media as a whole.
Plainly, twitter (et al) wants to be seen more like your right to self-publish a manifesto and less like a corporation for whom we work for zero wages while they steal our data. They are hiding behind the Bill of Rights which, simply, does not apply to them whatsoever.
As a result, users like @realDonaldTrump are allowed free range to “say whatever they want” in “the name of free speech.” That right is not guaranteed by the BOR, but rather, it is promised by the terms and conditions of this corporate entity.
(I promise the irony of this thread on Twitter is not lost on me)
So, Donald Trump has spent the last 9 weeks informing his supporters that the election was stolen and democracy is broken. How did the vast majority of citizens encounter this disinformation campaign? Social media.
Social Media corporations are welcome to question the government. THAT is actually protected free speech. But, these social media corporations (who profit from posts by DJT) do not want us to see their publication of disinformation as *the corporation exercising free speech.*
They want us to hold them blameless (like a fax machine utilized to send copies of a manifesto from one person to another) and to see their publication of DJT’s disinformation about our democracy as a utility performing its natural function.
But the ugly truth is that Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Parler, Instagram, and many others are corporations who have intentionally allowed DJT to inject disinformation that is dangerously detrimental our democracy into public discourse because they (1) like ad dollars and...
(2) Want to avoid regulation.

These capitalist, corporate-owned “platforms” are spreading lies about an American election for the purpose of increasing click revenue.
As long as social media corporations give a platform to those who would destroy our democracy for personal gain, they are responsible for the destructive outcomes.

In my opinion, this means the US Congress has a valid tort claim against each of these social media corps.

More from Trump

1. Yes, Trump will claim to intend to target GOP senators up for reelection in '22 (like he did to Thune with Kristi Noem) if they don't join in @HawleyMO's sedition on Jan. 6, but the fact is, it's not clear whether Trump will be successful in ANY of those efforts & voting yes


2. to hedge off these threats will also create fissures & fractures for these incumbents among other elements of their party that could complicate their renominations. Indeed, what worries me the most about the potential for the country to slip into @anneapplebaum territory is

3. that what should be robust and intense push back from the party establishment against actually ending democracy- bc that's what Trump's request would do, if it was granted, is fairly muted. What we SHOULD be seeing from the mainstream of the party is threats to strip committee

4. assignments, chairs, privileges, even reelection funds, if anyone gets involved in this bullshit- in the House & the Senate, and the fact that you don't see it is more than a story of McConnell & McCarthy being afraid of Trump & his base. Its a story of receptivity, of the

5. level of receptivity the congressional and party leadership is dealing with both within the rank and file membership of the party and within its donor class, and THAT, my friends, is why you find me so concerned. That, and my decision to finally pull @anneapplebaum's book

You May Also Like