Tier 3-4A and Tier 4B (us, the Internet Group) would receive liquidity and 800# notification dependent upon the Department of Defense security teamโs new protocols developed to prevent Swamp Rat...
@TheWiseOwl_AZ 5ย years, 10ย months ago 629 views
1. With President Trump and family now secure at Camp David:
There was a lot of release activity on Fri. night 27 Nov. from 7:30pm EST onward. This weekend Department of Defense Security and RV teams were getting things cleaned up for the Shotgun Start that would happen...
Tier 3-4A and Tier 4B (us, the Internet Group) would receive liquidity and 800# notification dependent upon the Department of Defense security teamโs new protocols developed to prevent Swamp Rat...
After exchanges/redemption at special rates began they would go on for approximately ten days, at which time the general...
A. C19 was originally planned by the US [D]eep State rats in concert with [D]eep State co-conspirators, the Chinese Communist Party. The very name C19 indicated that the Scam-demic was to start in the USA in...
The [D]eep State actually perpetrated C19 on innocent Chinese in Wuhan China from Dec 31, 2019 onward, almost 1.5 months after the โJohn Hopkins Pandemic Preparedness Exerciseโ...
Trump and DoD White Hats (Secty of Defense Chris Miller, Undersecty of Defense Intel Ezra Cohen Watnick, newly pardoned Gen. Michael T Flynn, et al.)...
More from ๐บ๐ธI Support Our Military & Law Enforcement๐บ๐ธ
More from Trump
Youโd think that if Pence could overturn the election like Trump claimed then Biden surely wouldโve taken up that chance
Also this is such a small thing but one thing I noticed in that Trump campaign ad the defense just ran, there were no citations, unlike every clip that the impeachment managers showed
Michael Van Der Veen is giving us the full Fox News Primetime Defense.
PROCESS ARGUMENT.
DRINK.
Lol my guy this is the chance to rebut the evidence that theyโve presented against Trump.
Unless Trump's new lawyer is going to argue Hilary Clinton went to court and lost 60 times and then launched an attack on the Capitol, these clips of Democrats objecting to vote counting and being overruled by VP Biden are a waste of time.
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) February 12, 2021
Also this is such a small thing but one thing I noticed in that Trump campaign ad the defense just ran, there were no citations, unlike every clip that the impeachment managers showed
Michael Van Der Veen is giving us the full Fox News Primetime Defense.
PROCESS ARGUMENT.
DRINK.
Lol my guy this is the chance to rebut the evidence that theyโve presented against Trump.
Itโs not clear how Dr. Sean Conley has determined Trump will no longer need to isolate only 10 days after symptom onset.
Looks like the CDC Guidelines say Trump should be in the category that needs to isolate for 20 days after symptom onset.๐
Plus ...
2. Fauci on Thursday used a (test-based) approach, in which case, per Fauci:
Trump needs to isolate for 10 days after symptoms RESOLVE (not symptoms onset) and then two negative tests.
Note: based on his coughing on Hannity last night, Trumpโs symptoms havenโt resolved yet.
3. Hereโs a longer quote from Fauci (via @MarionRenault):
https://t.co/oRdrtxQe80
4. Also noteworthy: on Hannity last night, Trump wouldnโt say heโs tested negative.๐
Thus failing one of the conditions required by Fauci for Trump to be considered no longer contagious.
5/5. This resource on coronavirus (UpToDate) has been specially made available to the public. It describes the test-based and non-test-based approaches.
Looks like the CDC Guidelines say Trump should be in the category that needs to isolate for 20 days after symptom onset.๐
Plus ...
Severe COVID Pneumonia defined as low oxygen sats <94 % as confirmed by the President\u2019s chief of staff, in addition to other clinically consistent information: shortness of breath to name one.
— Vin Gupta \u201c\U0001f637!\u201d MD (@VinGuptaMD) October 9, 2020
That buys 20 days of isolation. At 74 with co-morbidities, \u2066@CDCgov\u2069 is right pic.twitter.com/fR3jc9jYQI
2. Fauci on Thursday used a (test-based) approach, in which case, per Fauci:
Trump needs to isolate for 10 days after symptoms RESOLVE (not symptoms onset) and then two negative tests.
Note: based on his coughing on Hannity last night, Trumpโs symptoms havenโt resolved yet.
Dr. Fauci: "If the President goes 10 days w/o symptoms & they do the tests-then you could make the assumption, based on good science, that he is not infected. But you have to make sure you go through those particular benchmarks delineated in the CDC guidelines." #AMRstaff
— Andrea Mitchell (@mitchellreports) October 8, 2020
3. Hereโs a longer quote from Fauci (via @MarionRenault):
https://t.co/oRdrtxQe80
4. Also noteworthy: on Hannity last night, Trump wouldnโt say heโs tested negative.๐
Thus failing one of the conditions required by Fauci for Trump to be considered no longer contagious.
Mark the date, we have reached the point where even Sean Hannity is asking Trump simple questions that the president can\u2019t or won\u2019t answer https://t.co/HgMpIsOCJn
— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) October 9, 2020
5/5. This resource on coronavirus (UpToDate) has been specially made available to the public. It describes the test-based and non-test-based approaches.
You May Also Like
โWe donโt negotiate salariesโ is a negotiation tactic.
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I donโt appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but thatโs negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didnโt want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but itโs not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. [โฆ]
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I donโt appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but thatโs negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
"we don't negotiate salaries" really means "we'd prefer to negotiate massive signing bonuses and equity grants, but we'll negotiate salary if you REALLY insist" https://t.co/80k7nWAMoK
— Aditya Mukerjee, the Otterrific \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@chimeracoder) December 4, 2018
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didnโt want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but itโs not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. [โฆ]
1/โWhat would need to be true for you toโฆ.Xโ
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
2/ First, โXโ could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- โFeel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- โFeel that weโre in a good place as a companyโ
- โFeel that weโre on the same pageโ
- โFeel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we arenโt that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders donโt know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is โwhat would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?โ
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, โXโ could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- โFeel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- โFeel that weโre in a good place as a companyโ
- โFeel that weโre on the same pageโ
- โFeel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we arenโt that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders donโt know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is โwhat would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?โ
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
